(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Casliber: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Casliber: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 154: Line 154:
#[[User:Nousernamesleft|Nousernamesleft]] ([[User talk:Nousernamesleft|talk]]) 22:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
#[[User:Nousernamesleft|Nousernamesleft]] ([[User talk:Nousernamesleft|talk]]) 22:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. <small>[[m:User talk:Macy|m]][[User talk:Macy|acy]]</small> 22:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. <small>[[m:User talk:Macy|m]][[User talk:Macy|acy]]</small> 22:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
#'''Support''' for a fair-minded and competent user, though I do note the concerns of the opposers regarding potential loss of content. Hopefully Cas will keep up his high-quality article work. [[User:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Glass</font>]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Cobra</font>]]''' 22:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


==Oppose==
==Oppose==

Revision as of 22:52, 1 December 2008

Casliber

Hello, I am Casliber (which happens to be an unspaced version of my real name) and have been editing since May 2006, and an admin since March 2007. I am nominating myself for arbcom as I feel I have some attributes which may be of benefit to wikipedia in difficult cases.

My main role is as a contributor and coordinator of (hopefully) quality content; wikipedia excels in its opportunity and use of collaborative editing. No man editor is an island and the skills in various areas of putting pen to paper (or digital equivalent) that I have improved on since I have been here I have been impressed and grateful for. I have spent most time in areas which make use of collaborative editing; Featured Article, DYK and (to a lesser extent) Good Article writing, as well as involvement with various wikiprojects (Fungi, Dinosaurs, Birds, D&D, medicine, some sports etc.), and have thought of ways of how to bring out the best in people with respect to article writing and improvement.

Now in my day job I am a psychiatrist and part of my job/role/skill-set/training etc. involves listening and watching and figuring out things like whether people are able to negotiate and collaborate with others, and if/how they can assume responsibility.

I figure experience in both of these areas may be useful in analysing difficult cases in how firmly to apply remedies or when to cut some slack in figuring out what is ultimately best for the 'pedia and how to get the best out of users.

Another point I'd like to make is that doctors generally shouldn't treat themselves or their families; the analogy here is arbcom. Many currently involved, and seeking to get elected have been involved for some time. This is a good thing and I fully support their involvement. However, I do think the committee may benefit from some experienced wikipedians who may not have been heavily involved and are hence more able to make objective observations and recommendations in some cases where arbcom members may be involved or a particular case is critical of some aspect integral to arbcom in some way.

Thus, if folks feel this is a benefit, I am happy to serve. If people feel all candidates should be heavily experienced, then so be it. Ask away.

Support

  1. Privatemusings (talk) 00:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Cool Hand Luke 00:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Maxim(talk) 00:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Captain panda 00:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Kanonkas :  Talk  00:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Cla68 (talk) 00:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Black Kite 00:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sluzzelin talk 00:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support --maclean 00:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Seraphim♥ 00:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  12. ~the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 00:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Tom B (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Strongest support —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 00:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Perhaps a head doctor is what we need around here! JodyB talk 02:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Rationale. Giggy (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ~ priyanath talk 00:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support. Mathsci (talk) 00:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support per User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes. Jehochman Talk 00:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support - Shot info (talk) 00:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Strong Support A fair, level-headed contributor who resolves conflict well and whom I trust to put their considerable expertise and experience to work for the betterment of the project. Steven Walling (talk) 00:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  23. iridescent 00:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  24. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --PeaceNT (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  26. krimpet✽ 00:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  27. -- Mattinbgn\talk 00:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PhilKnight (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support - I would like to add that I would support you for multiple positions at ArbCom at the same time. :P Ottava Rima (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Sam Blab 01:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Majorly talk 01:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  32. I like Casliber, I think he's very bright, it would be very interesting to have a psychiatrist on the Arbitration Committee and all in all I have hopes that he will do a great job. His lack of familiarity with the issues before the committee does concern me, and I found it very strange that he set up a straw poll on the contents of his signature. But, on balance, a support. Avruch T 01:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Despite some concerns, I think Cas would be a net benefit to arb. Gimmetrow 01:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Protonk (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Strong support has strong understanding of the basics. AC makes articlewriters more inclined to write, I think. YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model) 01:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  38. See reasoning. east718 01:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  39. I had made a list of people who I would be find with (though not necessarily in top 7) on ArbCom and this candidate was one of those people. - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 01:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Graham87 01:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  41. iMatthew 01:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --- Euryalus (talk) 01:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  43. — CharlotteWebb 01:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support: Perhalps one of the most talent, balanced and charasmatic editors we have seen on wikipedia. His contribs are just amazing. Ceoil (talk) 01:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Dedicated to the encyclopedia part of the project. AgneCheese/Wine 01:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Great user! Great helper :D --Mixwell!Talk 02:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Atmoz (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Possibly the strongest support for anyone I will vote for. All around good contributor and colleague. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 02:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  49. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Though the mainspace needs you. John Reaves 02:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support yes. J.delanoygabsadds 02:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Kingturtle (talk) 02:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  53. L'Aquatique[talk] 02:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Never previously heard of this editor, but seems well qualified, certainly enough to be given a chance at this. And a trained psychiatrist no less ... that shouldn't do any harm! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 02:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Daniel (talk) 02:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support. rootology (C)(T) 02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  57. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  58. John Vandenberg (chat) 03:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Tentative support. Prodego talk 03:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  60. GtstrickyTalk or C 03:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Strong candidate, mature outlook and even temperament, good demonstrated abilities in conflict resolution and taking the heat out of situations, unquestionably part of the community - all things ArbCom needs right now. I hope it doesn't affect his excellent mainspace contribs too much though :( Orderinchaos 03:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Epbr123 (talk) 03:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  63. David Shankbone 03:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Has a calm demeanor suited for an arbitrator. Royalbroil 03:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support BJTalk 04:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Eusebeus (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Casliber is a well-rounded editor and knows much of the site in and out - he would likely bring an educated and intelligent perspective to ArbCom. Master&Expert (Talk) 04:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  68. I heartily endorse this product and/or service. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Strongest support, an ideal candidate-the highest competency with everything that matters, patient, diligent, gets the project. --JayHenry (talk) 04:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support. Would make a good arb. --Alecmconroy (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Mike H. Fierce! 04:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Law shoot! 05:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support. Everyking (talk) 05:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support as fellow DYK reviewer. Haven't seen this guy lose his head there, and there are opportunities. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  75. –Outriggr § 05:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support. Seems to have his head on straight, has been fair whenever I've run into him, and I think he'd do a fine job. ···日本にっぽん穣みのる? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support. (rationale) rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 06:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Yeah, OK. MER-C 06:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support. Cirt (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Graham Colm Talk 07:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  81. –Moondyne 07:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support. — Athaenara ✉ 07:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Strong support لennavecia 07:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  84. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Davewild (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  86. -- Avi (talk) 08:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Ironholds (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Likely to get stuff done, and get it done well. Pedro :  Chat  08:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Strong support, sensible stance on BLP and ArbCom's role, exactly what we need right now. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 09:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Strong support per stance on BLP indicated in Lar's questions Fritzpoll (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  93. —Dark talk 09:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Strongest possible support. - The only negative that could possibly come from this person sitting on ArbCom would be a slightly lower article development level of activity. I think that's a reasonable tradeoff for such an obviously thoughtful and careful addition to the committee; contributing to a better environment on WP will necessarily attract more good editors. // roux   editor review09:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Avenue (talk) 09:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Oldelpaso (talk) 10:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Very pleasant interaction despite occasionally opposite views. – sgeureka t•c 10:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Stifle (talk) 10:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  100. — neuro(talk) 10:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Absolutely. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support - Mr Bungle | talk 10:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  103. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this message! - 10:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Very sane. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 11:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support - With the condition that he continues his great article work. ScarianCall me Pat! 11:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support with the hope that his article work does not suffer. Woody (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Jayen466 12:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Good chap. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 12:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support See my reasons in User:Secret/ArbCom. Note if there isn't a comment on the candidate there, I was on vacation and couldn't edit the past weekend, will leave one today. Secret account 12:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Everything about him sounds good. Sticky Parkin 13:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support --CrohnieGalTalk 13:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support, even though his content contributions may diminish.[1] Kablammo (talk) 14:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --Kbdank71 14:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support JoJan (talk) 14:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Colchicum (talk) 15:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support PseudoOne (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Good judgment: hopefully a breath of fresh air. Moreschi (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Verbal chat 15:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Helpful, thoughtful and voice of reasonful. But don't you dare slack off the mainspace work! --Dweller (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support--Taprobanus (talk) 15:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Provisional support: good user, but I want a promise that you won't stop writing articles. Sceptre (talk) 16:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support --Tikiwont (talk) 16:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support, but please do keep contributing to the encyclopedia. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  125. I have complete confidence in Casliber. He is very trustworthy, experienced, and civil. Acalamari 17:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support I trust Casliber's judgement completely. I fully expect his excellent contributions to articles to continue as well, as I think that will provide the grounding that he (and other arbs) need to make sure they understand how the community works now. Karanacs (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Strong Support I'll be honest, I'd oppose just to keep him working on the articles (even if they're about shrooms). But we need to upgrade and improve Arbcomm, and Cas is the right person to do it. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 18:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Hate to bureaucratize such a great content contributor, but his content work will give him excellent perspective on the Committee. Plus, he can help the Committee work through some of their Oedipal issues... :) MastCell Talk 18:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  130.  Sandstein  19:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Synergy 19:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support - sound responses and communication, background good addition to arbcom. Martinp (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support, just don't leave DYK ! NVO (talk) 19:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Tiptoety talk 20:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  135. AGK 20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support. I share the concerns of the FA crew on the opposition but I think he is capable of both. spryde | talk 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  137. As long as you promise not to overmedicate Giano ;) Pcap ping 20:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Wetman (talk) 21:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Just look at his most-edited articles: vampire, lion, mental disorders and poisonous mushrooms. He's way more dangerous than Bishzilla! Franamax (talk) 21:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support.Biophys (talk) 21:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support -- Suntag ☼ 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Support The Helpful One 21:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Kafka Liz (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Like many others, I worry that his FA-related activities may lessen because of it, but one should not be prevented from "branching out" just because they are good at something else. JPG-GR (talk) 22:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support if he keeps contributing. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Support ...Modernist (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Nousernamesleft (talk) 22:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support. macy 22:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support for a fair-minded and competent user, though I do note the concerns of the opposers regarding potential loss of content. Hopefully Cas will keep up his high-quality article work. GlassCobra 22:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose. Rschen7754 (T C) 00:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nufy8 (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dlabtot (talk) 00:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Voyaging(talk) 00:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I fear we will lose Casliber's prolific Banksia/fairy wren/dinosaur/random animal FA production if he is elected to the AC. Also, a bit too unfamiliar with the committee's dealings for my liking. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Nothing personal, but I chose a group I want to win. Good luck though. RockManQReview me 01:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose because I'd rather have Cas continue his excellent featured work than have him get sidelined and end up with enemies. The articles need you more than the 'cracy! --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 02:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ArbCom must be disbanded and replaced with a system which actually works. Sorry, I oppose. Bstone (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. All things to all men. Too nice, and too many politicians' answers.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 10:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. David Fuchs sums up my concerns well. Mackensen (talk) 11:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  12. He deserves better. Dengero (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Extremely, extremely, good user. That about sums it up, since his content is too good to lose. —Ceran ♦ ♦ (speak) 22:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Casliber&oldid=255299294"