Talk:Fantasy Black Channel: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
→Checklist and analysis: galist |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Checklist and analysis=== |
===Checklist and analysis=== |
||
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|here]] for criteria) |
|||
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. |
|||
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{1b}}}}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. |
|||
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|{{{2a}}}}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2b}}}}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2c}}}}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. |
|||
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|{{{3a}}}}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|{{{3b}}}}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''. |
|||
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|{{{4}}}}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''stable'''. |
|||
#:''No edit wars etc.'': {{GAList/check|{{{5}}}}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate. |
|||
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6a}}}}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6b}}}}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#'''Overall''': |
|||
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|{{{7}}}}} |
|||
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> |
|||
===Other comments=== |
===Other comments=== |
Revision as of 15:38, 23 May 2009
Fantasy Black Channel is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 21:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
Albums B‑class | |||||||
|
Alternative music B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Electronic music B‑class | ||||||||||
|
To-do list for Fantasy Black Channel:
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fantasy Black Channel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hello Rafablu88. I'll be reviewing this article per your request. I should be finished by Saturday if not earlier. Timmeh!(review me) 01:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers. I don't envisage any problems that would leave it hanging until or after Saturday. I've gone over and over with a fine comb. I might send it for FA review after. Fingers crossed. Off to bed now (UK time). Enjoy the read. Rafablu88 (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Checklist and analysis
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Other comments
Categories:
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- B-Class Alternative music articles
- Unknown-importance Alternative music articles
- WikiProject Alternative music articles
- B-Class electronic music articles
- Unknown-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Wikipedia articles that use British English