(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Fantasy Black Channel: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Fantasy Black Channel: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
implement ArticleHistory
cleanup
Line 16: Line 16:
{{todo}}
{{todo}}
{{British English}}
{{British English}}

==GA Review==

:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Fantasy Black Channel/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''
Hello Rafablu88. I'll be reviewing this article per your request. I should be finished by Saturday if not earlier. [[User:Timmeh|<span style="color:darkred;font:bold 10pt kristen itc">Tim</span>]][[User talk:Timmeh|<span style="color:black;font:bold 10pt kristen itc">meh</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Timmeh|<font color="darkred" size="4">!</font>]]<sub>([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Timmeh|<font color="darkred">review me</font>]])</sub> 01:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

:: Cheers. I don't envisage any problems that would leave it hanging until or after Saturday. I've gone over and over with a fine comb. I might send it for FA review after. Fingers crossed. Off to bed now (UK time). Enjoy the read. [[User:Rafablu88|Rafablu88]] ([[User talk:Rafablu88|talk]]) 01:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

===Checklist and analysis===
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|here]] for criteria)

#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::As with every GA nominee I've reviewed, I've had to fix some minor formatting and grammatical errors, but there was nothing major.
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::These are all good for GA.
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::Talks about all the major aspects of the album: its history, musical style, reception, release, etc.
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars etc.'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->I'm passing this for GA, as it complies with all the requirements. Good luck taking it to FA. [[User:Timmeh|<span style="color:darkred;font:bold 10pt kristen itc">Tim</span>]][[User talk:Timmeh|<span style="color:black;font:bold 10pt kristen itc">meh</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Timmeh|<font color="darkred" size="4">!</font>]]<sub>([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Timmeh|<font color="darkred">review me</font>]])</sub> 15:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

===Other comments===

Revision as of 21:07, 23 May 2009

Good articleFantasy Black Channel has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed