Talk:Fantasy Black Channel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:46, 26 May 2009

This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria.
Please feel free to leave comments.
After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes.

Fantasy Black Channel has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 23, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums GA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Alternative music GA‑class Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music GA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fantasy Black Channel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello Rafablu88. I'll be reviewing this article per your request. I should be finished by Saturday if not earlier. Tim meh !_{(review me)} 01:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I don't envisage any problems that would leave it hanging until or after Saturday. I've gone over and over with a fine comb. I might send it for FA review after. Fingers crossed. Off to bed now (UK time). Enjoy the read. Rafablu88 (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist and analysis

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
As with every GA nominee I've reviewed, I've had to fix some minor formatting and grammatical errors, but there was nothing major.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
These are all good for GA.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Talks about all the major aspects of the album: its history, musical style, reception, release, etc.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'm passing this for GA, as it complies with all the requirements. Good luck taking it to FA. Tim meh !_{(review me)} 15:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 }}
 {{WPBS|1=
-{{album|class=GA|importance=}}
+{{album|class=GA|importance=mid}}
-{{WikiProject Alternative music|class=GA|importance=}}
+{{WikiProject Alternative music|class=GA|importance=low}}
-{{WikiProject Electronic music|class=GA|importance=}}}}
+{{WikiProject Electronic music|class=GA|importance=low}}}}
 {{British English}}