Talk:Encyclopedia Astronautica: Difference between revisions
→Reliabel Source: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|space_exploration-importance= |
|space_exploration-importance= |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WPAstronomy|class=start|importance=bottom}} |
|||
==Notability Discussion== |
==Notability Discussion== |
||
Revision as of 20:23, 19 April 2010
.jpg){kind=small} | Astronomy Start‑class Bottom‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Notability Discussion
This article has been tagged for {{notability}} issues since October 2007, without any commentary. A similar article (which interlinks to this article), on Jonathan's Space Report, seems to have the same issue but I've not tagged it (nor was I the original notability tagger for this E.A. article. I haven't researched Encyclopedia Astronautica sufficently yet to have a vote in the notability discussion, but there needs to be a notability discussion soon, else the tag ought to be removed and an {{expand}} tag added. - Ageekgal (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- No discussion. I have changed the tag. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 16:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Reliabel Source
How reliable is Encyclopedia Astronautica considered as a source for Wikipedia articles? It seems very good, but also self-published by Mark Wade. --Apoc2400 (talk) 13:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)