Talk:Encyclopedia Astronautica: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
removed deprecated banner |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Spaceflight|class=Stub|importance=}} |
|||
{{WPSpace |
|||
|small= |
|||
|class=Stub |
|||
<!-- Related projects --> |
|||
|astronomy= |
|||
|astro_object= |
|||
|astrophysics= |
|||
|solar_system= |
|||
|mars= |
|||
|moon= |
|||
|space_exploration=yes |
|||
<!-- Project importance ratings --> |
|||
|mars-importance= |
|||
|moon-importance= |
|||
|space_exploration-importance= |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WPAstronomy|class=start|importance=bottom}} |
{{WPAstronomy|class=start|importance=bottom}} |
||
Revision as of 05:31, 20 January 2011
 | Spaceflight Stub‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small} | Astronomy Start‑class Bottom‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Notability Discussion
This article has been tagged for {{notability}} issues since October 2007, without any commentary. A similar article (which interlinks to this article), on Jonathan's Space Report, seems to have the same issue but I've not tagged it (nor was I the original notability tagger for this E.A. article. I haven't researched Encyclopedia Astronautica sufficently yet to have a vote in the notability discussion, but there needs to be a notability discussion soon, else the tag ought to be removed and an {{expand}} tag added. - Ageekgal (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- No discussion. I have changed the tag. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 16:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Reliabel Source
How reliable is Encyclopedia Astronautica considered as a source for Wikipedia articles? It seems very good, but also self-published by Mark Wade. --Apoc2400 (talk) 13:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)