(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Flag of South Korea: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Flag of South Korea: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 131: Line 131:
::::Again, the link you provided was not to the 1882 edition. According to Chosun Ilbo, [[:File:Taegukgi.jpg]] is the earliest surviving depiction of the flag, and so of historical interest for that reason... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 12:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
::::Again, the link you provided was not to the 1882 edition. According to Chosun Ilbo, [[:File:Taegukgi.jpg]] is the earliest surviving depiction of the flag, and so of historical interest for that reason... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 12:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
:::::I am not sure what you are talking about. English Chosun.com said a flag is "''The oldest Taegukgi, the national flag of Korea, was found. This version is listed in Flags of Maritime Nations, published by the Bureau of Navigation at the U.S. Navy Department in July 1882. This version uses the four trigrams from the Book of Changes. Until now, Park Yeong-hyo was known as the first person to use four trigrams from the Book of Changes. The flag was published two or three months before Park moved to Japan.''" and other flags are "''national flag of Chosun printed in Japanese newspaper Jijishinpo on Oct. 2, 1882. One in the right is the "national flag of Goryeo" mentioned in a diplomatic document of the Ching Dynasty, dated March 1883.''"[http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2004/01/26/2004012661030.html] So the all flags mentioned are not Korean official flags. The opinion that the flag other than the oldest flag should not be in the article is not persuasive. ―― [[User:Phoenix7777|Phoenix7777]] ([[User talk:Phoenix7777|talk]]) 13:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
:::::I am not sure what you are talking about. English Chosun.com said a flag is "''The oldest Taegukgi, the national flag of Korea, was found. This version is listed in Flags of Maritime Nations, published by the Bureau of Navigation at the U.S. Navy Department in July 1882. This version uses the four trigrams from the Book of Changes. Until now, Park Yeong-hyo was known as the first person to use four trigrams from the Book of Changes. The flag was published two or three months before Park moved to Japan.''" and other flags are "''national flag of Chosun printed in Japanese newspaper Jijishinpo on Oct. 2, 1882. One in the right is the "national flag of Goryeo" mentioned in a diplomatic document of the Ching Dynasty, dated March 1883.''"[http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2004/01/26/2004012661030.html] So the all flags mentioned are not Korean official flags. The opinion that the flag other than the oldest flag should not be in the article is not persuasive. ―― [[User:Phoenix7777|Phoenix7777]] ([[User talk:Phoenix7777|talk]]) 13:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

== Trigram contradiction ==

For the 3 full bars (geon/건/いぬい), the English Wikipedia says the element is heaven/목/. I'm sure heaven is not , which is tree. The Chinese Wikipedia says the same trigram represents gold/금/かね. Which one is true? --[[User:Chochopk|ChoChoPK]] (たまだまPK) ([[User talk:Chochopk|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Chochopk|contrib]]) 17:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:12, 12 April 2012

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconKorea Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHeraldry and vexillology Start‑class
WikiProject iconFlag of South Korea is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Image caption error

None of the pictures in Image:Flag of old Korea.jpg are from the July 1882 United States Navy flag book! Instead, that would be image http://english.chosun.com/media/photo/news/200401/200401260030_00.jpg , linked from http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200401/200401260030.html AnonMoos 19:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WBC-TVCM-ORIGINAL.JPG

Image:WBC-TVCM-ORIGINAL.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax

This edit is a possibly hoax.

Before 1883, there was no official national flag of the Kingdom of Korea when this country was under the protection of China. In 1882, Korean ambassador Bak Yeong-hyo to Japan requested the Chinese government allow him to use flag of the Qing Empire as the flag of Korea, but was refused by Qing government. So, the Chinese commissioner in Korea Mr. Ma Jian-zhong suggested the Korean government use the Chinese Taiji-Bagua flag as the national flag of Kingdom of Korea, the Korean government accepted this suggestion then began to use the flag officially in 1883; some modifications were made in later years. The flag ceased to be used during the Japanese occupation and became the national flag of South Korea again after the independence of South Korea in later of 1940s [1]

Baike.Baidu.com is not a reliable source. It is a Chinese version wikipedia. Anyone can edit without verification. It is still doubt that original reference is trusted source. I checked original reference.

http://baike.baidu.com/view/227631.htm

In baike.baidu.com, Very first Original Reference are only 2.

1.http://www.yhlshxx.com/printpage.asp?ArticleID=346
this reference link is dead.
2.http://travel2.enorth.com.cn/jjzt/fifa/hg/xuzhi_8.htm
travel2.enorth.com.cn site is not a acadmic site. neverthless, this referennce never mentioned that.

This hoax is well known in Chinese internet. However, I must point out that why these source are Wrong.

by Wikipedia:Verifiability, I removed it.

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed.


In 1882, Korean ambassador Bak Yeong-hyo to Japan requested the Chinese government allow him to use flag of the Qing Empire as the flag of Korea, but was refused by Qing government.

This is not true. On the contrary, Qing requested the Korea government use similar style of the Qing Empire flag as the flag of Korea. but Korea goverment opposed it.

According to 1882.10.2 Japanese newspaper 時事新報じじしんぽう text,

うまけんちゅう朝鮮ちょうせん國旗こっきささえしたがえ三角形さんかっけい靑地あおじりゅうくべし 本國ほんごくささえ黃色おうしょくもちいるども朝鮮ちょうせんささえ東方とうほうあたくにたるをもっひがし靑色あおいろとうとぶのによ り靑地あおじもちいふべしと指示しじしたるに國王こくおうだいこれいきどおけっし てささえ國旗こっきに倣ふべからぬとして四角形しかっけいたましょく太極たいきょく(ふたともえ)を あおあかにてはた四隅よすみ東西とうざい南北なんぼくえきけたるを 自今じこん朝鮮ちょうせん國旗こっきていむるむね沙汰さたせられたりとあり」 [1]

-translation- "Ma Jianzhong suggest korea use national falg as Qing dynsaty style. King Gojong upset by this absurd claim, He do not want Qing dynasty style flag. He ordered national falg by thier own which cleary diffrece from Qing."

This record is 1882 Japanese news paper, this record is more reliable. because same time period record and 3rd party record. so it is reliable. Chinese side reocrd made by thier sinocentrism. possibly fabrication. or internet made fabrication?

First design of Taegeuk style flag designed by Lee ung Jeyun. He disngend first Taegeuk style flag which four trigrams. However, Ma Jianzhong opposed this design. and he redisgned Taegeki which eight trigrams. Later, Park Yong Hyo, decide to use Taegeuk style flag which four trigrams. Newssports (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We do not need internet bullshit.

Here is the 時事新報じじしんぽう original text and flag image.[2] "Flag of Joseon"Newssports (talk) 06:00, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The translation, however, is not correct. And it is also true that the korea was under protection of Qing Dynasty at that time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.189.96.77 (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry a bit late, however I have something to add. :P
QUOTE: "Baike.Baidu.com is not a reliable source. It is a Chinese version wikipedia. Anyone can edit without verification."
Not entirely correct - not everyone can edit it, like you can with Wikipedia. Once you make an addition, it has to be verified before it is published, which usually takes about 24 to 48 hours (this ensures an iron grip on information, e.g. so that Taiwan Independence activists don't vandalize, etc etc). Just to make sure everyone has the full idea. :D -- ひろし杰  | Talk contribs 12:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Baike. Baidu.com is NOT a reliable source. The 24-48 hour wait period is used more for censorship of dissenting opinions, rather than fact-checking. 216.165.35.121 (talk) 06:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax or not, the Chinese Wikipedia version still has it. The English and Chinese version must be consistent. --ChoChoPK (たまだまPK) (talk | contrib) 06:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why "must" they be consistent? -- AnonMoos (talk) 12:47, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery of Old Flag Discredits 'Taegukgi' Legend

http://www.serimuse.org/DOC/mu/doc/muPdsV.html?p_tabgbn=YmJz&regseq=258&nPage=6

The oldest Taegukgi, the national flag of Korea, was found. This version is listed in ‘Flags of Maritime Nations,’ published by the Bureau of Navigation at the U.S. Navy Department in July 1882. This version uses the four trigrams from the Book of Changes. Until now, Park Yeong-hyo was known as the first person to use four trigrams from the Book of Changes. The flag was published two or three months before Park moved to Japan.

The oldest picture of a “Taegukgi,” the national flag of Korea, has been discovered, giving insight into how the flag’s symbols came to be used. The Taegukgi was found in the “Flags of Maritime Nations,” issued by the U.S. Navy Department’s Bureau of Navigation in July 1882, and with its red and blue yin-yang symbol and four black trigrams has the same form as the current Korean flag. This Taegukgi would be two or three months older than the one used by Park Yeong-hyo, who is known as the first to make and use a four-trigram flag. Park did so during a diplomatic mission to Japan from August to September of 1882.

In the foreword of “Flags of Maritime Nations,” it is written that the U.S. Senate voted on July 19, 1882 to make 3,000 copies of the book and distribute among government bodies. If so, than the Korean flag depicted in it would have been in use at least two or three months prior to the printing of the book. This would decisively discredit the popularly held belief that Park Yeong-hyo made the first Taegukgi. On the left is the ‘national flag of Chosun’ printed in Japanese newspaper ‘Jijishinpo’ on Oct. 2, 1882. One in the right is the "national flag of Goryeo" mentioned in a diplomatic document of the Ching Dynasty, dated March 1883.

In March 1883, the Taegukgi was formally adopted as the Korean national flag.

Kim Weon-mo, an honorary professor at Dankook University and an expert on the Korean flag, said that the one found in Flags of Maritime Nations is presumed to be one displayed when the Treaty of Chemulpo between Korea’s Chosun Dynasty and the United States was signed on May 22, 1882.

The oldest picture of the Korean flag was a black-and-white drawing found in the October 10, 1882 edition of the Japanese newspaper, Jijishinpo. It is labeled as the Chosun flag.

Flags of Maritime Nations lists color pictures of flags from 49 nations in alphabetical order. Newssports (talk) 09:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

some thing else

hi every one this sites so 'giggles in backround good —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.114.154 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

discrepancies on the Meaning of the Trigrams

According to the Flags of the World article on the ROK flag, the trigrams are called Kwae. The ones used on the ROK flag are called KUN, YI, KAM, KON, which differs from the names used in the article (i.e.: GEON, RI, GAM, GON) but that might be a transliteration thing. What I am concerned about is the meaning of these symbols. According to the Flags of the World article, which quotes an official site from South Korea, the GEON (or KUN) symbol represents HEAVEN, and not METAL.

Could someone that understands this flag better than I do please shine some knowledge? Thank you --Pinnecco (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think "heaven" is the same as what's shown as "sky" in the table. For the standard Chinese meanings, see Ba gua... AnonMoos (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so because it is talking about the ELEMENTS. That is along with water and fire, etc. It even mentions in the article itself just below the table of the trigrams: "Traditionally, the four trigrams are related to the Five Elements of fire, water, earth, wood, and metal. An analogy could also be drawn with the four western classical elements." --Pinnecco (talk) 03:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Heaven" is not one of the traditional classical Chinese five elements (it's not in the list you provided in your own remarks). If you notice any significant discrepancy between the table in this article and the listings in Ba gua and Wu Xing, then that could certainly be a problem, but I don't think that what you've said so far indicates such a discrepancy. AnonMoos (talk) 08:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well I am not an expert in Taoism, although it does fascinates me. Have a look at Flags of the World for their explanation, and please let us know if you see any discrepancy. I am actually trying to research the meanings of this flag. What better way than helping with a Wikipedia article? =) --Pinnecco (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pinnecco-- Korean uses an alphabet called Hangul. Either of the spellings you listed above can be considered acceptable romanizations of the Korean spelling of these symbols. As the article suggests, the four symbols on the flag also have multiple layers of meaning. Heaven is a common interpretation of geon--commonly pronounced chun. The words for chun may mean either heaven (as in the heavens) or sky. Hanul, however, is the Korean word that equates with the western religious idea of heaven —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.53.119.195 (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous file

I see a collection image of three old version flag uploaded by Phoenix7777 (talk · contribs). Although there are no problem file itself, it have reason for removing at one time.

This article described about South Korean flag, and it is no more need to put the old version picture on this article. In addition, one of old version flag including flag of Qing tributary comment, which seems that there is doubt about his intended by comparison on the Talk:Joseon Dynasty, are some doubtful aspects.--Historiographer (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Historiographer, I am sorry but I don't understand your explanation probably because of a language problem. I didn't upload the image but simply reverted an edit by a block evading sockpuppet of Philip126[3]. I only added a caption of the image.[4][5]. The image was placed in the History section so the old version is quite adequate to be there. The image came from a notable Korean newspaper The Chosun Ilbo[6] and United States Navy Dept.[7]. I know why Korean editors dislike this image because the flag listed in the Chinese book has a description "Qing's tributary state" (だい清国きよくにぞく). However whether the description is comfortable or not for Korean editors, It is an undeniable fact of Korean history and the image is backed by the reliable sources, unless any effective objection to include the image, I will restore the image and the caption. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:12, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The exact link seems to be http://www.archive.org/stream/ofmaritimeflagsn00unitrich#page/n45/mode/2up (though that's not to the 1882 edition). As far as I understand it, the main objections to File:Flag_of_old_Korea.jpg are that the left and center represent Japanese and Chinese ideas of the Korean flag (rather than the Korean definition of the flag), while the right is not actually the Korean flag as such, but something different (though related) -- see File:Flag of the king of Joseon.svg. -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The flag by United States Navy Dept.[8] is also United States' idea of Korean flag (rather than the Korean definition of the flag). ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the link you provided was not to the 1882 edition. According to Chosun Ilbo, File:Taegukgi.jpg is the earliest surviving depiction of the flag, and so of historical interest for that reason... AnonMoos (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure what you are talking about. English Chosun.com said a flag is "The oldest Taegukgi, the national flag of Korea, was found. This version is listed in Flags of Maritime Nations, published by the Bureau of Navigation at the U.S. Navy Department in July 1882. This version uses the four trigrams from the Book of Changes. Until now, Park Yeong-hyo was known as the first person to use four trigrams from the Book of Changes. The flag was published two or three months before Park moved to Japan." and other flags are "national flag of Chosun printed in Japanese newspaper Jijishinpo on Oct. 2, 1882. One in the right is the "national flag of Goryeo" mentioned in a diplomatic document of the Ching Dynasty, dated March 1883."[9] So the all flags mentioned are not Korean official flags. The opinion that the flag other than the oldest flag should not be in the article is not persuasive. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trigram contradiction

For the 3 full bars (geon/건/いぬい), the English Wikipedia says the element is heaven/목/. I'm sure heaven is not , which is tree. The Chinese Wikipedia says the same trigram represents gold/금/かね. Which one is true? --ChoChoPK (たまだまPK) (talk | contrib) 17:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]