(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:Sasata: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

User talk:Sasata: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
archive
Line 1: Line 1:
<ref></ref>{{Archive box collapsible|box-width=250px|
: [[/Archive 1]] 16/Mar/2008 – 24/Feb/2009
: [[/Archive 2]] 24/Feb/2009 – 27/Apr/2009
: [[/Archive 3]] 05/May/2009 – 10/Aug/2009
: [[/Archive 4]] 11/Aug/2009 – 18/Oct/2009
: [[/Archive 5]] 19/Oct/2009 – 18/Jan/2010
: [[/Archive 6]] 19/Jan/2010 – 02/Apr/2010
: [[/Archive 7]] 03/April/2010 – 21/May/2010
: [[/Archive 8]] 22/May/2010 – 05/Oct/2010
: [[/Archive 9]] 06/Oct/2010 – 31/Oct/2010
: [[/Archive 10]] 01/Nov/2010 – 05/Jan/2011
: [[/Archive 11]] 06/Jan/2011 – 28/Feb/2011
: [[/Archive 12]] 01/Mar/2011 – 22/Jul/2011
: [[/Archive 13]] 23/Jul/2011 – 15 Oct/2011
: [[/Archive 14]] 16 Oct/2011 – 31 Dec/2011
: [[/Archive 15]] 01 Jan/2012 – 30 Mar 2012
: [[/Archive 16]] 01 Apr/2012 – 31 Jul 2012
: [[/Archive 17]] 01 Aug/2012 – 31 Oct 2012
: [[/Archive 18]] 01 Nov/2012 – 01 Feb 2013
: [[/Archive 19]] 02 Feb/2013 – 15 Jun 2013
: [[/Archive 20]] 16 Jun/2013 – 01 Oct 2013
: [[/Archive 21]] 02 Oct 2013 – 20 May 2014
: [[/Archive 22]] 21 May 2014 – Dec 31 2014
: [[/Archive 23]] 01 Jan 2015 – July 31 2015
}}



==Reminders to myself==
*other ''[[Omphalotus]]'' species articles to work on (esp. ''[[Omphalotus japonicus|O.&nbsp;japonicus]]''; maybe others)
*prep ''[[Phlebopus marginatus]]'', ''[[Boletus luridiformis]]'' for GA/FA
*[[Salamander]] for GA/FA
*[[Coffee]] GA/FA
*c/e and update ''[[Amanita muscaria]]''
*''[[Tricholoma ustale]]'', ''[[Durianella]]'', ''[[Austropaxillus]]'', ''[[Austropaxillus infundibuliformis]]'', ''[[Tapinella atrotomentosa]]'', ''[[Buchwaldoboletus lignicola]]'', ''[[Lactarius porninsis]]'', ''[[Lactarius fuliginosus]]'', ''[[Xerocomellus]]'', ''[[Xerocomus subtomentosus]]'' to GA
*[[Carrot]], [[Parsnip]] to GA
*[[Yeast]] back to GA
*[[Magnus Carlsen]] FA
*''[[Lactarius deterrimus]]'' FA

==State of Genera lists in family articles==
Not including monogeneric families. I'm afraid things leave much to be desired, and I can hardly proceed without reasonably accurate lists of genera-by-family... [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 16:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
:Ok, give me a day or two. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 16:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
::Also, you migth want to review [[User talk:Sasata/Archive 10#Genus_placement|what we had unearthed while working on Marasmiaceae]], as it is relevant to some cases here. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 16:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I think we want three crucial things here:
#Any given genus is listed for one and one family only (or ''incertae sedis'').
##The genus article does not conflict with the family one.
#We list as many genera in the article as the number we have in text.
#The number in family articles is the same as in [[List of Agaricales genera]] (noting where the numbers of genera in a family differ from the number in that entry for the Dict.).
Beyond that there are places where practical choices will have to be made, as you noted about [[Hormographiella]]. I suspect Entolomataceae might come down to what is simplest for us (e.g. if in some case most species don't have names under ''Entoloma'', as happens with ''[[Endoptychum]]''). [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 20:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

*Hmmm, [[Crepidotaceae]] and [[Chromocyphellaceae]] need to be added to various places, according to [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00279.x/full this] ... the work keeps piling up ... [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 00:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
**Maybe we should stay with Kirk & al.'s [[Inocybaceae]] here, but maybe that's just my instinct. These devellopment are really nothing short of a Fungal equivalent of the APG revolution, but they lack a "central synthesis", with Kirk & al. slow to take up on these changes. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 00:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
***Yeah, I dunno. From the paper: "The present investigation serves to highlight a number of contentious issues relating to recent molecular studies of the Crepidotaceae in particular, and molecular systematics in general: As has been shown before, taxon sampling is of crucial importance, and the addition of various key taxa may have considerable influence on the resulting phylogenetic hypotheses. In this study, most of the investigations differ widely in their choice of ingroup (and outgroup) taxa, leading to widely different hypotheses of higher-level relationships." So all this work may have to be revised in the future. This sort of stuff is why I find it easier to work on single species, despite my "mission" to fill out the higher-level taxa. Ok, that's enough for me today, I feel like doing something else :) [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 00:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
****What where Kirk & al. thinking anyway? You can't synonymize [[Crepidotaceae]] under [[Inocybaceae]] under any rule of the code! [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 00:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
****Having thought about it a bit more, how about we keep everything in Crepidotaceae (=? Inocybaceae ''sensu'' Kirk & al.) with commentary to the effect the family is known to be polyphyletic, but an final disposition has yet to be agreed on? It's already what we do about Cystodermateae and ''Endoptychum'' (at least in [[List of Agaricaceae genera]]), for example. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 13:20, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
*****Sound good to me. I will try to sort out Amylocorticiales, Crepidotaceae, Inocybaceae, and Chromocyphellaceae today. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 13:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
*Ok, I started an article at [[Amylocorticiales]] (will be adding more over the next few days). Any opinion on how we should handle the taxonomy of genera within? Give family as ''incertae sedis'', and redirect [[Amylocorticiaceae]] to Amylocorticiales? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 17:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
**When I read it, it seemed pretty obvious they were better circumscribing Amylocorticiaceae and moving it to a monotypic order. The only genera that could be said to become ''incertae sedis'' would be those (if any) that they ''excluded'' from Amylocorticiaceae without assigning them a putative family. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 18:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
*So apparently ''[[Cribbea]]'' {{doi-inline|10.1071/SB07041|might be in Physalacriaceae}}. This is convenient (if correct: I don,t have access to that journal) as it resets [[Cortinariaceae]] to the correct number of genera, but it threatens [[Physalacriaceae]] with Cribbeaceae. w00t! </sarcasm> [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 13:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
**What fun would it be if it wasn't a challenge? I don't have access to that journal, but I know [[user:Casliber|who does]]. I'll ask if I can get it and update the page. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 14:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
***I got the paper from Cas (very nice paper, BTW), and yes, it's clearly in the Physalacriaceae, pretty close to ''[[Oudemansiella]]''. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 14:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
*For [[Bolbitiaceae]], I'll start work and add a note on the Agaricales families list about the 17 v. 15 discrepancy. For [[Entolomataceae]], the Wikipedia way is typically "when in doubt, be conservative", so going with six genera and noting the dict. disagreement is a reasonable approach. I'll be waiting on a usable combined list for Inocybaceae and Crepidotaceae at the latter before I start on it. This leaves me with a reasonable buffer to work on.[[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 19:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
**Actually, having now looked at [http://www.persoonia.org/Issue/23/11.pdf Co-David & al.], I say we go with three genera (Clitop., Entol., Rhodocybella), since they made all the necessary combination (they suspect ''Rhodocybella'' to fall in ''Clitopilus'', but keep it separate for now). I've edited the family list accordingly, and will now do the same for the generic list. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 12:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
*Which author is being followed for [[Hygrophoraceae]]? Not only is the number of genera in the lead not that of the Dict., but we list 11 in the taxobox, which, although the number given in dict., are definitely not those placed there in that work. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 00:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
**Some investigation here: We have ''[[Pseudoarmillariella]]'' under [[Tricholomataceae]] (including the list of genera), but it seems to belong fairly clearly in Hygrophoraceae. That genus is unplaced in the Dict., which recognizes ''Cuphophyllus'', but that recognition seems unwarranted. If we add ''Camarophyllus'' and ''Gliophorus'', but exclude ''Camarophyllopsis'', we get 11 genera: the 10 from Dict. with three extra (''Pseudoarm., Camarophyllus, Gl.'') and two cut off (''Cuph., Camarophyllopsis''; the first seems doomed to synonymy, the second belongs somewhere else not yet clear) [http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/98/6/982], [http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/103/2/280]. I will be working with that. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 18:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
***Hi Circeus, I'm still with you, just devoting my limited wiki-time to finishing a primate article offline. Will get back into Agaricales once this monkey is off my back (lol). [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 16:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
****It's okay. As it is, it appears the one part where your input will be really needed are the Physalacriaceae, Inocybaceae/Crepidotaceae and Strophariaceae. I'm Probably going to have to expand a ridiculous amount of energy figuring out what's going on with Maccagnia too. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 16:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
{| class=wikitable
|-
!Family
!Genera<br>in lead
!Genera<br>in list
!Notes
|-
| <s>[[Amylocorticiaceae]]</s>
| <s>10</s>
| <s>8</s>
|What do we do of the Amylocorticiales paper?
*I say we use it. The authors are heavy hitters in fungal molecular phylogenetics, they used a 6-locus dataset & large sample size, so it looks good. I'll update pages soonish. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 21:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
**{{done}}
|-
| [[Bolbitiaceae]]
| 17
| 15
| Found ''[[Cyphellopus]]'' and ''[[Gallerella (fungus)|Galerella]]''. ''[[Setchelliogaster]]'' may belong here too (says IF & MycoBank; Dict. says either Bolbitiaceae or Cortinariaceae)
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Clavariaceae]]
| 7
| 7
|
|-
| [[Cortinariaceae]]
| 12
| 13<ref>Descolea listed here and in [[Bolbitiaceae]]
*Now removed from the Bolbitiaceae.</ref>
|I confirmed that all 13 genera listed are given by the Dict as being in this family, so .... ? <s>Will make stubs for those redlinks.</s> Done.
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Cyphellaceae]]
| 16
| 16
|
|-
| [[Entolomataceae]]
| 4
| 6<ref>With two unlinked</ref>
|The Dict prefers to lump ''[[Rhodocybe]]'', ''[[Rhodocybella]]'', ''[[Rhodogaster]]'', ''[[Richoniella]]'', and several others not listed here into ''[[Entoloma]]''. Many other sources keep them (or combinations thereof) separate. Who do we follow? The correct path to follow, I suspect, will only be revealed with much research ...
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Fistulinaceae]]
| 3
| 3
|
|-
| [[Hydnangiaceae]]
| 2 (List)<br>4 (article)
| 4
|# of genera depends on whether one treats the truffle-like ''[[Hydnangium]]'' and ''[[Podohydnangium]]'' as separate or lumped into ''[[Laccaria]]'' (like the Dict. does). Will investigate further.
|-
| [[Hygrophoraceae]]
| 9
| 11
|
|-
| [[Inocybaceae]]
| 13
| 10
|
|-
| [[Lyophyllaceae]]
| 8
| 9
| All nine genera listed in the article belong in this family, says Dict. (''Lyophyllopsis'', however, is listed as "? Lyophyllaceae"
|-
| [[Mycenaceae]]
| 10
| 11
|I guess the extra genus is the extinct ''[[Protomycena]]'', to which the Dict. does not assign a family. Interestingly, they say the name is invalid.
:Might be because their way of counting anamorphs is at best murky: they seem not to count ''Ugola'' in Lyophyllaceae; do they include ''Decapitatus'' in their count for Mycenaceae? Impossible to tell. If they don't, they give ten, but list nine (which becomes 10 with ''Protomycena'').
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Niaceae]]
| 6
| 6
|
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Phelloriniaceae]]
| 2
| 2
|
|-
| [[Physalacriaceae]]
| 11
| 16
|*''[[Guyanagaster]]'' is new and not accounted for in the Dict
*don't know about ''[[Hormomitaria]]''-Dict says = ''[[Physalacria]]''; Fungorum says it's valid; Mycobank says it's in the [[Marasmiaceae]]; no recent literature
**I say we keep it in. It seems to be traditionally treated close to ''Physalacria'', and MB seems to have it in Marasmiaceae because no family monograph of either group has been published since the 80s. I say edge on separate genus in Phys.
*''[[Dactylosporina]]'': Dict says Marasmiaceae "or perhaps Physalacriaceae"; Fungorum & MycoBank says Marasmiaceae
*''[[Himantia]]'' is anamorphic; not sure about the Dict's accounting for anamorph genera
**Dict. has ''Himantia'' unplaced to anything ("anamorphic ''Fungi''").
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Pleurotaceae]]
| 6
| <s>7</s> 6
|Fixed. ''Resupinatus'' was in there erroneously.
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Pluteaceae]]
| 4
| 4
|
|-
| [[Psathyrellaceae]]
| 12
| <s>6</s> 12
|Now updated to include 12 genera. I included the anamorphic ''[[Hormographiella]]'', don't know if that's "cheating" or not, but it has ''[[Coprinopsis]]'' teleomorphs, so it clearly belongs in this family.
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Pterulaceae]]
| 12
| 12
|
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Schizophyllaceae]]
| 2
| 2
|
|-
| [[Strophariaceae]]
| 18
| 13
| In [http://www.clarku.edu/faculty/dhibbett/Reprints%20PDFs/Mathenyetal_Agaricales_2006.pdf Matheny et al., 2006], they showed that ''[[Galerina]]'', ''[[Phaeocollybia]]'', ''[[Psilocybe]]'' (bluing ones), ''[[Anamika]]'', ''[[Hebeloma]]'', ''[[Alnicola]]'', and ''[[Flammula]]'' cluster in a branch that is sister to the Stropharicaceae ''sensu strico''. However, no formal familial change was made, and the Dict. classification does not follow this phylogeny (and they do state explicitly that they have taken into account the molecular results from that 2006 issue of Mycologia where several higher-level phylogenetics papers were published.) How to approach this on Wikipedia? About a year ago someone from the Matheny lab changed the families for these genera to [[Hymenogastraceae]]; I changed some of them back, because I wasn't convinced in some cases (i.e., the type species wasn't used in the analysis). Are we in limbo until the next phylogenetics paper comes out?
:I think following either is fine. Looks like an editorial, not formal scientific choice on the part of Kirk & al., and either choice is phylogenetically valid, plus the study actually says (probably accounting for Kirk & al.'s approach): "Indeed Bayesian analyses [...] significantly support [...] the union of Hymenogastraceae and Strophariaceae s. str. A recent 25S rRNA only analysis suggested a rather inclusive treatment of the Strophariaceae."
|-
| [[Tapinellaceae]]
| 2
| 3
|All three genera listed seem valid, and are given by the Dict itself as belonging in this family.
|- style=background-color:#99FF99
| [[Typhulaceae]]
| 6
| 6
|
|}

{{Reflist}}
===Reached maximum completion===
So I've just finished adding all I could, except for Physalacriaceae, Strophariaceae (incl. Hemigasteraceae) and Crepidotaceae (incl. Inocybaceae), for which (as said above) I'm reliant on you to establish lists of genera we are reasonably happy with. If Crepidotaceae ends up above 20 genera or so, I'll make it a separate list. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 23:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
:Speaking of your Russulales idea, I'd make it a combined list for families and Genera, or at least consider it as a possibility. However, I notice the article clearly states ''[[Clavicorona]]'' ought to be in the Agaricales, but I can't find a family placement for it (except MycoBank, in the [[Tricholomataceae]], but I don't trust it all that much). [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 00:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

==Taylor & Francis==
You should have received an email a couple of weeks ago regarding Taylor & Francis - could you please either fill out the linked form or let me know if you didn't get the email? We'd like to get these processed soon. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 19:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}} – [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 21:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 25, 2015]] ==

Hi Sasata. A summary of a Featured Article you conominated at [[WP:FAC]] will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? (Feel free to ping Casliber if you like, I gave him one earlier and I'm trying to spread out the workload.) I'm not getting many ghits on "scarlet-stemmed bolete", apart from ones with similar text to the Wikipedia article, and generally there's a "no aliases" rule at TFA. I bend the rule for a common name in addition to a scientific name, but I don't want to break the rule. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 16:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
:Looks fine to me. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

== ''Wolfiporia'' species cleanup ==

Thanks! [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 19:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
:No problem; I stubbed all of the species redlinks in ''[[Wolfiporia]]'' for good measure as well. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 01:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

==Suillus luteus==

Thank you for your message. The page references you requested reg. ''Suillus luteus'' are 266-267. The book is in both Greek and English. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you need more information.

regards,
Michael <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.251.118.251|46.251.118.251]] ([[User talk:46.251.118.251|talk]]) 06:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Suillus luteus has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Suillus luteus]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Suillus luteus|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 18:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

....aaaand is at FAC now. Have been buffing ''[[Suillus bovinus]]'' too, may as well do that one....also scanned some others. Any other pique your interest? [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 02:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
:The Jersey cow is a fine choice, there's ample literature out there to make a beefy FA. I look forward to expanding enough to include some of [http://mushroomobserver.org/29585?q=2d0D1 these] excellent images! As for piquing my interest ... they all do! But I'm also itching to use my new bolete books... [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 03:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
::I did think about ''[[Boletus aereus]]'' and the others close to ''B. edulis'' too. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 06:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
:::Am buffing ''aereus'' as well. Also, forgot that ''[[Boletus pinophilus]]'' is GA, but could maybe do with a big shove the [[WP:FAC|Extra Mile]] [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
::::I've got less literature on purely European boletes (compared to those that at least make an appearance in North America), but I'll see if there's anything useful I can add. I'd be interested in taking on one of the bolete genera to GA/FA, or even any of the families. Sound interesting? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 05:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
::::::Oh well, there's ''barrowsii'' as well I'd like to buff. Did you have Singer's book? That was good for infrageneric classification. The genera are in a bit of flux, let me think on that. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 07:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
:::::::I seem to have gotten distracted by eye-candy [[Clavariaceae]] and its genera; I'll rejoin the cow expansion when my bolete muse returns :) [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 04:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::BTW...to keep the production line coming, have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_candidates&type=revision&diff=683398551&oldid=683391260 nominated] ''B. aereus'' as a co-nom by you and me as I find it makes the process much smoother (24 hours coverage for starters!) cheers, [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::Good! ''bovinus'' next ... [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 01:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::::Any other book stuff you have to add to it? Probably push it to GAN soon...[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 22:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::::I'll set aside some time tonight to work on it (have been busy lately). [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::::::I've added what I think is relevant - still more journal articles but they seem to be on obscure enzymes and dissecting uptake etc. BTW Another article that might be fun to buff is ''[[Gyrodon lividus]]'' [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 12:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::::::I'm finished adding stuff (for now) and think it's ready for a GAN. Agree with ''G. lividus'' (the genus page could use an overhaul too...) [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 19:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Damn...''[[Gyrodon lividus]]'' is proving hard to dredge up info for..as is the genus..have been trying to read up on them both but really meagre pickings. My impression is they are probably ripe for a paper or review sometime soon...maybe punting ''[[Rubroboletus pulcherrimus]]'' over the FA line or something..I did have an inkling about ''[[Tapinella atrotomentosa]]'' but a cursory look suggested sources might be hard for that too....anyway just some stream-of-consciousness writing. I guess anything that has been recently given a new genus name might be good..[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 12:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
:I thought the same myself about ''G. lividus''. I still have a bit of stuff to add, but GA is probably a good end goal for the time being. Will have a look at the others when I get back from travelling. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 14:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
::An easier target might be ''[[Xerocomus subtomentosus]]'' actually....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 19:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
:::Yes, I did have that bolete on a to-do list. The [http://www.speciesfungorum.org/GSD/GSDspecies.asp?RecordID=216300 synonymy] is imposing. Why is Fungorum still calling it a ''Boletus''? Another option is ''[[Rubroboletus satanas]]'', now that it has a nice new genus. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 16:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
::::I want to do ''[[Rubroboletus satanas]]'' at some point, just frustrating that no-one has published the split and recognition of North American ''satanas'' as ''eastwoodiae'' (have they??) - as soon as that is done, I reckon we buff it in a flash. ''[[Xerocomus subtomentosus]]'' looks best bet for next, other possibles include ''[[Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca]]'' too...? Or...anyway, there are a bunch. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
:::::''H. aurantiaca'' looks like an interesting one; I will expand it for a couple of days and get back to ''X. subtomentosus'' soon. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 01:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
::::::I just stumbled across alot of cool stuff about ''[[Turbinellus floccosus]]'' in the 1947 paper about different growth habits at different elevations. Not sure how much has been upheld or disproven but interesting. Another article that is not far off GAN...and I suppose ''[[Gomphus clavatus]]'' might be an FAC nom with not too much buffing either...decisions decisions....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
:::::::I was thinking both of those could use an update & expansion... I'm in! [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 01:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
::::::::Just see where your enthusiasm leads you. I am oscillating between the three of them....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]])
:::::::::''H. aurantiaca'' has been coming along nicely, and I think I can still scrape out some more from my sources tomorrow. I suspect the others will be relatively easy to put together as well. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 08:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
:We should add ''[[Ramaria formosa]]'' to the "easy to buff to GA" list. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 22:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
::Ok - have scoured my books for stuff on ''[[Ramaria formosa]]'' and added what I can. Now for journals I guess....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 04:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
:::I've got some more book info to add, hopefully tonight. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 21:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Sutorius eximius]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Sutorius eximius]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Sutorius eximius]]==
The article [[Sutorius eximius]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Sutorius eximius]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Geopyxis carbonaria]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Geopyxis carbonaria]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 20:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

==''Phengaris rebeli'' reassessment==
Hello, I have noticed that the GA reassessment page for ''[[Phengaris rebeli]]'' seems to be still open, despite you initiating it nearly two years ago. I don't think anyone has closed it, and I thought I'd let you know about it. I assume everything has long been solved? Thanks, [[User:Burklemore1|Burklemore1]] ([[User talk:Burklemore1|talk]]) 16:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
:Forgot about this completely. I'll have a look more closely this weekend. I'd like to check out some of the refs myself to see how closely they are to the text. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 08:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
::Okay cool. I just thought it was slightly odd that a reassessment page was open for so long, so it would have been wise to tell you. [[User:Burklemore1|Burklemore1]] ([[User talk:Burklemore1|talk]]) 14:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Geopyxis carbonaria]]==
The article [[Geopyxis carbonaria]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Geopyxis carbonaria]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

==Sutorius eximius has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Sutorius eximius]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Sutorius eximius|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 23:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

== [[Mushroom]] ==

{{self-trout}} Thanks for cleaning up after me - I attempted to fix a couple of minor formatting issues and I think I ended up just making it worse. [[User:Samtar|samtar]]<sup>([[User_talk:Samtar|leave me a message]])</sup> 17:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
:No problem, formatting cleanup is easy ... it will take a lot more effort to clean up other problems with the article :) [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 17:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Sutorius eximius==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#5 September 2015|5 September 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Sutorius eximius]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that although the '''[[Sutorius eximius|lilac-brown bolete]]''' is eaten in the [[Hengduan Mountains]], it has reportedly poisoned people in [[New England]]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Sutorius eximius|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Sutorius eximius]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Sutorius eximius|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Sutorius eximius]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Sutorius_eximius&datefrom=2015-09-01&dateto=2015-09-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201509/Sutorius_eximius daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Suillus luteus==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#12 September 2015|12 September 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Suillus luteus]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the '''[[Suillus luteus|slippery jack]]''' ''(pictured)'' can protect its host [[pine]] trees from copper and cadmium toxicity?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Suillus luteus|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Suillus luteus]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Suillus luteus|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Suillus luteus]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Suillus_luteus&datefrom=2015-09-01&dateto=2015-09-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201509/Suillus_luteus daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 15:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Bridgeoporus]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Bridgeoporus]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 10:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Phellodon]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Phellodon]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Bridgeoporus]]==
The article [[Bridgeoporus]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Bridgeoporus]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 3, 2015]] ==

Hey, I'm not sure whether to use stubby-stalk, short-stemmed slippery Jack, or neither in the summary ... it depends on whether either of those names really does get a lot of use. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 15:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
:A quick internet search shows that "short-stemmed slippery Jack" appears to be the most commonly used name on English-language web pages I checked. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
::Thanks kindly. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 18:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Good to see that today, [[Wikipedia:QAI/Awesome Wikipedian|precious again]], --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Phellodon]]==
The article [[Phellodon]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Phellodon]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 09:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

== ''Cunninghamella bertholletiae'' ==

Sasata, I am planning to assign a student to this fungus this semester. I think the Index Fungorum record is wrong and this should not be synonymized with ''C. elegans''. The most recent monograph suggests they are different. I'm curious if there's something I'm missing. [[User:Medmyco|Medmyco]] ([[User talk:Medmyco|talk]]) 01:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
:Ah, feel free to revert my move then, I was not aware that more recent work had outdated IF's synonymy. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 02:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
::Before I do let me double-check with Dr. Summerbell that there isn't some reason I'm unaware of that explains the Index Fungorum record! [[User:Medmyco|Medmyco]] ([[User talk:Medmyco|talk]]) 14:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

== Exserohilum ==

Hi! I noticed you updated the Exserohilum page. I'm currently doing research before I add onto the page, there is a mini draft in my own talk page. I was just wondering if you want to work together? I'm currently reading a book about "Molecular Detection of Human Fungal Pathogens" and "Identification of Pathogenix Fungi". So I'm open to anything you might have for me. [[User:Yihengsong|Yihengsong]] ([[User talk:Yihengsong|talk]]) 18:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
:Sure! I don't have any particular expertise in the topic, but am happy to help improve the article. I will probably end up making stubs for all of the species redlinks, then come back and add info to the genus article. Feel free to add info from your draft (after you've rephrased from the original source text), and I'll copyedit and tweak the wiki-formatting. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 16:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

==Dicranophora fulva has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Dicranophora fulva]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Dicranophora fulva|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 17:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

==DYK for Phellodon==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#20 October 2015|20 October 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Phellodon]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Phellodon niger|black tooth]]''' ''(pictured)'', the [[type species]] of genus '''''[[Phellodon]]''''', is used in [[mushroom dye]]ing?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Phellodon|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Phellodon]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Phellodon|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Phellodon]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Phellodon&datefrom=2015-10-01&dateto=2015-10-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201510/Phellodon daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 02:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Phellodon niger==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#20 October 2015|20 October 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Phellodon niger]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Phellodon niger|black tooth]]''' ''(pictured)'', the [[type species]] of genus '''''[[Phellodon]]''''', is used in [[mushroom dye]]ing?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Phellodon niger|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Phellodon niger]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Phellodon niger|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Phellodon niger]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Phellodon_niger&datefrom=2015-10-01&dateto=2015-10-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201510/Phellodon_niger daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 02:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Macrolepiota clelandii]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Macrolepiota clelandii]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

==Hygrophorus erubescens has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Hygrophorus erubescens]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophorus erubescens|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 04:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->


==Psilocybe semilanceata distribution==

Hi !

Where is the reference of this "However, it has also been reported occasionally from warmer locations such as India, South America, and Australasia." ? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Boussole folle|Boussole folle]] ([[User talk:Boussole folle|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Boussole folle|contribs]]) 19:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Refs for these locations are in the "Distribution" section. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 19:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
::OK, but this is not because it has been reported in warmer countries, that means ''P. semilanceata'' grows on warm climate. India and Australia are huge countries, and have regions with cool temperate climate.[[User:Boussole folle|Boussole folle]] ([[User talk:Boussole folle|talk]]) 22:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
:::I agree. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 23:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

==Macrolepiota clelandii has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Macrolepiota clelandii]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Macrolepiota clelandii|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 02:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

==DYK for Suillus bovinus==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#5 November 2015|5 November 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Suillus bovinus]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the '''[[Suillus bovinus|Jersey cow mushroom]]''' is thought to be parasitised by the [[Gomphidius roseus|rosy spike-cap]] ''(both pictured)''?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Suillus bovinus|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Suillus bovinus]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Suillus bovinus|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Suillus bovinus]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Suillus_bovinus&datefrom=2015-11-01&dateto=2015-11-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201511/Suillus_bovinus daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Dicranophora fulva==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#7 November 2015|7 November 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Dicranophora fulva]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the mold species '''''[[Dicranophora fulva]]''''' was not recorded between 1935 and 1994?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Dicranophora fulva|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Dicranophora fulva]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Dicranophora fulva|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Dicranophora fulva]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Dicranophora_fulva&datefrom=2015-11-01&dateto=2015-11-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201511/Dicranophora_fulva daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 12:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Hapalopilus nidulans]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Hapalopilus nidulans]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:FunkMonk|FunkMonk]]</small> -- [[User:FunkMonk|FunkMonk]] ([[User talk:FunkMonk|talk]]) 16:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Macrolepiota clelandii==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#11 November 2015|11 November 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Macrolepiota clelandii]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the '''[[Macrolepiota clelandii|graceful parasol]]''' ''(pictured)'' is typically found in [[eucalypt]] forest and subtropical rainforests?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Macrolepiota clelandii|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Macrolepiota clelandii]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Macrolepiota clelandii|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Macrolepiota clelandii]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Macrolepiota_clelandii&datefrom=2015-11-01&dateto=2015-11-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201511/Macrolepiota_clelandii daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Hygrophorus erubescens==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#14 November 2015|14 November 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Hygrophorus erubescens]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''''[[Hygrophorus erubescens]]''''' is extinct in Britain, not having been seen since 1878?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophorus erubescens|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophorus erubescens]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophorus erubescens|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophorus erubescens]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Hygrophorus_erubescens&datefrom=2015-11-01&dateto=2015-11-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201511/Hygrophorus_erubescens daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

==Articles you contributed to have been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
-->The following articles that you've either created or significantly contributed to:

* [[Hygrophoropsis rufa]] ([[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis rufa|discussion]])
* [[Hygrophoropsis]] ([[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis|discussion]])

&nbsp;<!--
-->&nbsp;have been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. <!-- empty --> Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 02:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

==DYK for Laetiporus cremeiporus==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#20 November 2015|20 November 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Laetiporus cremeiporus]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the fungus '''''[[Laetiporus cremeiporus]]''''' smells like garbage?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Laetiporus cremeiporus|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Laetiporus cremeiporus]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Laetiporus cremeiporus|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Laetiporus cremeiporus]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Laetiporus_cremeiporus&datefrom=2015-11-01&dateto=2015-11-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201511/Laetiporus_cremeiporus daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 12:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Hygrophoropsis rufa==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#21 November 2015|21 November 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Hygrophoropsis rufa]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the mushroom '''''[[Hygrophoropsis rufa]]''''' was reported to smell like a photocopier?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis rufa|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis rufa]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophoropsis rufa|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophoropsis rufa]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Hygrophoropsis_rufa&datefrom=2015-11-01&dateto=2015-11-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201511/Hygrophoropsis_rufa daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 00:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

==Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 01:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

==Boletopsis grisea has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Boletopsis grisea]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Boletopsis grisea|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 03:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

==DYK for Hygrophoropsis==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#3 December 2015|3 December 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Hygrophoropsis]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the [[Lamella (mycology)|gills]] of mushrooms of the genus '''''[[Hygrophoropsis]]''''' are forked?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophoropsis|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophoropsis]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Hygrophoropsis&datefrom=2015-12-01&dateto=2015-12-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201512/Hygrophoropsis daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 12:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 16, 2015]] ==

Sasata, a summary of yet another Featured Article you nominated at [[WP:FAC]] will appear on the Main Page soon. You can use the page history to get a diff comparing it to the lead section of the article; how does it look? - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 17:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Dank}} looks fine to me, thanks. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
{{user precious again|four-footed earthstar, - "very pleasantly surprised to find a cluster of earthstar fungi growing on a rotting log—the lead image shows the beauties in their natural state only moments after I saw them"!}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Today: [[Sarcoscypha coccinea]], thank you! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

==Discussion at User talk:Rathfelder#Assess before removing stub templates==
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]]You are invited to join the discussion at [[User talk:Rathfelder#Assess before removing stub templates]]. Thanks. – [[User:Allen4names|Allen]]4[[User talk:Allen4names|names]] ([[Special:Contributions/Allen4names|contributions]]) 02:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] -->

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Stropharia caerulea]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Stropharia caerulea]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#19 December 2015|19 December 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the '''[[Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca|false chanterelle]]''' ''(pictured)'' is called ''guin''{{'}}''xacan'' ("delightful") or ''kia's gio''{{'}} ("iguana lard") by the [[Tepehuán people]] of northwestern Mexico?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Hygrophoropsis_aurantiaca&datefrom=2015-12-01&dateto=2015-12-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201512/Hygrophoropsis_aurantiaca daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 12:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner... ==

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2016 signups|sign up]]'''. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, [[User:Miyagawa]] has [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiCup#Retiring_as_Judge stepped down as judge]. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine ([[User:Figureskatingfan]]) and Jason ([[User:Sturmvogel 66]]) is Andrew ([[User:Godot13]]), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in [[WP:FP|Featured Pictures]]; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] have chosen to limit their participation. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiCup#Something_different_in_2016 here] for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring]] and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. <small>You are receiving this message because you are listed on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), [[User:Figureskatingfan|Figureskatingfan]] ([[User talk:Figureskatingfan|talk]]), and [[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]).--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Godot13@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=689768153 -->

== Project ==

Merry Christmas. Do you intend to work on a major group of non-animal organism like [[flowering plant]]s? [[User:LittleJerry|LittleJerry]] ([[User talk:LittleJerry|talk]]) 19:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
:Hi Jerry; nope, only fungi. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 22:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

==DYK for Boletopsis grisea==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#29 December 2015|29 December 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Boletopsis grisea]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the mushroom '''''[[Boletopsis grisea]]''''' is threatened by deforestation, air pollution, and the use of fertilizers and [[Agricultural lime|lime]] used to increase timber production?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Boletopsis grisea|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Boletopsis grisea]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Boletopsis grisea|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Boletopsis grisea]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Boletopsis_grisea&datefrom=2015-12-01&dateto=2015-12-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201512/Boletopsis_grisea daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Bovista pila]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Bovista pila]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Rcej|Rcej]]</small> -- [[User:Rcej|Rcej]] ([[User talk:Rcej|talk]]) 10:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Bovista pila]]==
The article [[Bovista pila]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Bovista pila]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Rcej|Rcej]]</small> -- [[User:Rcej|Rcej]] ([[User talk:Rcej|talk]]) 06:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Hygrophoropsis]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Hygrophoropsis]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 20:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

==Bovista pila has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{DYKM
| box3
| text = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Bovista pila]], an article you either created or significantly contributed to,<!--
-->&nbsp;has been nominated&nbsp; to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Bovista pila|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 03:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Hygrophoropsis]]==
The article [[Hygrophoropsis]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Hygrophoropsis]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 11:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

==DYK for Bovista pila==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#29 January 2016|29 January 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Bovista pila]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Bovista pila|tumbling puffballs]]''' ''(pictured)'' have been used as [[talisman|charms]] by the [[Chippewa]] people of North America?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Bovista pila|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bovista pila]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Bovista pila|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Bovista pila]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201601/Bovista_pila daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

== [[Meinhard Moser|Moser]] ==

I've been playing around with the Moser article for the last couple of weeks and I've gone ahead and nominated it at GAC. I suspect that you're sufficiently uninvolved to take on the review if you feel so inclined, but you're also welcome to jump in as a conominator or watch from the sidelines if you'd prefer! [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
:I agree that I'm sufficiently uninvolved, and also inclined! Review undertaken. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

== [[Psilocybe septentrionalis]] ==

I see. We have a little bit of circular referencing going on here. I got the image from the Wikidata entry, which was placed there by a bot, which it got from the Wikipedia article. But the image was deleted recently, and the Wikidata entry wasn't updated. [[User: Brightgalrs|'''<font color="#0645AD">Brightgalrs</font>''']] (<font color="#0645AD">/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/</font>)<sup><font color="#0645AD">[[User talk:Brightgalrs|[1]]]</font></sup> 15:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Hygrocybe appalachianensis]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Hygrocybe appalachianensis]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 11:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Hygrocybe appalachianensis]]==
The article [[Hygrocybe appalachianensis]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Hygrocybe appalachianensis]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]]</small> -- [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 11:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

== Genus ==

Please review the sources. It seems as if you have prejudged the issue. If there sub-species but not species, then (I am assuming) it is not a genus. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 17:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
:Sources reviewed. Your assumption is incorrect: one species or three, it's still a genus. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 17:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
::Thanks for clarifying. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 17:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

== [[Gomphus clavatus]] ==

I've been writing out the taxonomic history (Wulfen 1781 is quite good for anecdotes actually - might be good to see what he covers WRT other species for fun), so if it ignites some enthusiasm to get it towards FAC then that's great. Also, have ordered the article (on the talk page) for Turbinellus floccosus via interlibrary loan. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 04:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:Hi Cas. Recovering from [[cubital tunnel syndrome]] and so staying away from writing for a while; still watching and reading. Will be back at this article later, with added benefit of "strategic distance". [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 05:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
::Ouch! Oh take care and stay away from the computer then..no hurry/don't risk pushing anything..cheers, [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 09:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/requests/Sarcoscypha_coccinea]] ==

I see this was just scheduled, I'll go have a look. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 15:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

== Sarcoscypha coccinea ==
I disagree with your repeated removal of the {{tl|taxonbar}} template on [[Sarcoscypha coccinea]]. Of all the articles this infobox has been added to, you are the only person who has taken it down. Much like {{tl|Authority Control}}, {{tl|taxonbar}} has a very useful purpose for facilitating further research and checking on current taxonomic treatment. I feel your changes to the External link section have damaged the article. You said "all useful links already included" but you then proceeded to remove other useful links and replace them with links such as Encyclopedia of Life which you pulled from the {{tl|taxonbar}} infobox.--[[User:MCEllis|MCEllis]] ([[User talk:MCEllis|talk]]) 18:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
:I disagree with your repeated addition of the {{tl|taxonbar}} template on [[Sarcoscypha coccinea]]. "{{tl|taxonbar}} has a very useful purpose for facilitating further research" Says who? In what way is it "very useful" if it duplicates links already in the article? "but you then proceeded to remove other useful links" Such as? Links that were already included in the article? "I feel your changes to the External link section have damaged the article." How is it "damaged"? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 19:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
::"Such as?" To answer your question, you removed:
::*[http://www.gbif-mycology.de/HostedSites/Baral/Sarcoscypha.htm H.O. Baral, 2004. The European and North-American species of ''Sarcoscypha'']
::*[http://botit.botany.wisc.edu/toms_fungi/apr98.html Tom Volk's Fungus of the Month]
::*[http://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Sarcoscypha_coccinea.html California Fungi]
::*[https://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/facult/wet/biologie/pb/kulakbiocampus/paddestoelen/rode_kelkzwam.htm Close-up photos]
::I feel at least half of these were useful links and should have remained. How is it useful? It adds links to taxonomic databases regarding the taxon that otherwise could only be found in the article in the very long references section. I really don't want to fight with you but I do hope some of the links you have removed can be restored.--[[User:MCEllis|MCEllis]] ([[User talk:MCEllis|talk]]) 20:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
::Most of the links taxonbar added were not actually in the article originally as you claim. Taxonbar added the EoL link, the GBIF link, and the NCBI link. Each can be argued to be important for researchers. I only wish you could see how much this could help other fungi articles.--[[User:MCEllis|MCEllis]] ([[User talk:MCEllis|talk]]) 20:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
:::The link to H.O. Baral 2004 is already included in the article. The link to Tom Volk's Fungus of the Month does not offer anything substantial to the article. Same with the MykoWeb link. (see [[WP:ELNO]] for further guidance about when external links are useful). The link to the three unannotated photos does not offer anything to increase reader understanding. Most of our readers are general audience, not "researchers". I am a "researcher" and do not generally find links to EoL, GBIF, and NCBI useful. If you truly believe your taxon bar is helpful to "researchers" (I do not think so when it duplicates existing links), then why not hold an RfC, persuade the community with your arguments, and try to have it installed on all taxon articles? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 21:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

== Illustration for ''Nolanea'' ==
Hello. You have removed a photo from the ''Nolanea'' page on the grounds that Index Fungorum classifies the species in the photo as ''Entoloma''. But ''Nolanea'' is an old genus name and all its species are currently officially in genus ''Entoloma'', so by that argument we cannot have an illustration of ''Nolanea'' at all in the article. The article and the name are important for historical reasons and because the name is still used as a sub-genus in keys. Could you put back the photo or provide another one? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 17:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
:''Nolanea'' is considered valid by Index Fungorum, who [http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/browse/tree/id/3eca83177b3c3bf6b7cfb115e6b4fa12 accept 20 species] in the genus. The photo I removed was of "Nolanea mammosa", which [http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/NamesRecord.asp?RecordID=192693 is classified] in ''Entoloma''. I will put in a picture a ''Nolanea'' species (as currently accepted) if I can find one. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
::Sorry, I hadn't realized that ''Nolanea'' species were accepted in Species Fungorum. That would define a different meaning than the normal one I know, which is a sub-genus of ''Entoloma'' containing well-defined mushrooms which are officially in genus ''Entoloma''. I need more time to check, but I still don't think it is a real genus; I think those species are only known from old descriptions and if it were possible to identify them as current mushrooms, they would be reclassified as ''Entoloma''. I corrected my spelling mistake above. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 20:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
:::Have you seen the 2014 Henkel et al. ''Mycotaxon'' paper? ({{doi|10.5248/129.119}}) They summarize the generic status of Nolanea as follows: "The few molecular systematics studies published on Entolomataceae have proved rather equivocal regarding the status of Nolanea at the generic or subgeneric levels (e.g., Co-David et al. 2009; Baroni & Matheny 2011; He et al. 2013). Other preliminary molecular data support entolomatoid fungi with Nolanea’s morphological diagnostic characters as a genus (Bergemann & Largent unpubl.)." They described 10 new ''Nolanea'' species using Largent's generic concept (''Entolomatoid Fungi of the Western United States and Alaska'', 1994). <s>I can send you the Henkel paper if you're interested.</s> A PDF is available [http://tropicalfungi.org/wp-content/uploads/59.-Henkel-et-al.-2014-Nolanea-Mycotaxon.pdf here]. I agree with what you say about the species known only from older descriptions. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 02:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
::::Now I have looked at the "Henkel et al." paper and there is no disagreement about which group of mushrooms is meant by the term ''Nolanea''; the disagreement is just whether ''Nolanea'' should be a genus or whether it is a subgenus of ''Entoloma''. For instance if we consider a better-known species like "''Entoloma hirtipes'' (Schumach.) M.M. Moser", Henkel et al. would say that it should be called ''Nolanea hirtipes'', whereas the Species Fungorum camp put it in ''Entoloma''. The [http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/NamesRecord.asp?RecordID=18130 ''Nolanea'' page in Index Fungorum] shows that they do not recognize ''Nolanea'' as a genus.
::::But Henkel et al. have defined some new species of ''Nolanea'' - ''claviformis'', ''furcata'', ''mimiae'', ''rava'' and ''sinuolata''. Index Fungorum cannot make an entry for ''Entoloma claviformis'' (for instance) because it always has to give the author reference information to a valid description of the combined name. Doubtless no-one from the Nolanea-not-a-genus camp has written one for that species yet. Eventually someone will do so and Species Fungorum will then change the current name to ''Entoloma claviforme''.
::::I think that the Wikipedia article still should describe this group of mushrooms, whether it is a genus or a sub-genus - and a picture of any of the species in the sub-genus would be a valid illustration. Also the article should at least say that ''Nolanea'' is often considered a sub-genus of ''Entoloma'', as in the Kuo and Index Fungorum references.
::::[[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 19:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 6, 2016]] ==

[[User:Corinne|Corinne]] and I did this one. Should I move the mention of "fungus" up? - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 17:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
:Hi Dank, the blurb reads fine to me as is; thanks. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 17:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
{{user precious again|next, "widely considered the best edible mushroom of the large genus Russula", for which you've "exhausted" your sources!|width=42em}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

... today: [[Amanita bisporigera]], "one of several deadly toxic "destroying angel" mushrooms", thank you! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 05:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

== you've got mail ==

{{YGM}} --[[User:Ryan (Wiki Ed)|Ryan (Wiki Ed)]] ([[User talk:Ryan (Wiki Ed)|talk]]) 20:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

==Chalciporus has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{ivmbox
| 1 = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Chalciporus]], an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,<!--
-->has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Chalciporus|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 16:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
|2=Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

== WikiCup 2016 May newsletter ==

[[File:FAL-2016-Stanley, Falkland Islands–Christ Church Cathedral.jpg|thumb|FP of Christ Church Cathedral, Falkland Islands by Godot13]]

Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Cas Liber}} and one by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Montanabw }}), four Featured Lists (with three by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Calvin999}}), and 53 Good Articles (six by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Worm That Turned}} and five each by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Hurricanehink}}, {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Cwmhiraeth}}, and {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|MPJ-DK}}). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Adam Cuerden}} and five by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Godot13}}). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Cwmhiraeth}} scored 265 base points, while {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|The C of E}} and {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|MPJ-DK}} each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|MPJ-DK}} completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Cwmhiraeth}} and {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant7|Cas Liber}}, broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]]. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. {{User4|Sturmvogel 66}}, {{User4|Figureskatingfan}}, and {{user4|Godot13}} -- [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Godot13@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=713929026 -->

== How's your French? ==

I figured you'd be able to read [http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/4303760 this] more easily than me (do all canada schools teach French?), otherwise I will wade though google translate....or ask {{ping|Circeus}}....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
:I'm glad someone more competent than me translated that ... it's been a few (!) years since I completed high school French. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 17:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

==DYK for Chalciporus==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#16 May 2016|16 May 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Chalciporus]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that [[bolete]] mushrooms of the genus '''''[[Chalciporus]]''''', such as '''''[[Chalciporus pseudorubinellus|C. pseudorubinellus]]''''' ''(pictured)'', are thought to be [[Parasitism|parasitic]]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Chalciporus]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-06&end=2016-05-26&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Chalciporus Chalciporus])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

==DYK for Chalciporus pseudorubinellus==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#16 May 2016|16 May 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Chalciporus pseudorubinellus]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that [[bolete]] mushrooms of the genus '''''[[Chalciporus]]''''', such as '''''[[Chalciporus pseudorubinellus|C. pseudorubinellus]]''''' ''(pictured)'', are thought to be [[Parasitism|parasitic]]?'' You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-06&end=2016-05-26&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Chalciporus_pseudorubinellus Chalciporus pseudorubinellus])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

== vauthors vs. authors ==

Per your recent reverts of mine (from my {{para|vauthors}} to your {{para|authors}}), doing so removes all author information from the citation template's metadata. This information did not make it (yet?) into the maintenance category page, presumably due to improper wording and inflection ([[:Category talk:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list|discussion here]]). As long as you're aware of this and ok with it, that's fine (though others in favor of complete metadata probably won't be). I'll refrain from changing existing {{para|authors}} into {{para|vauthors}} for the time being. &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 16:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:I don't really care about template metadata. I'm more concerned that the removal of the trailing period after the author names renders the citation formatting on the page inconsistent; this is an issue especially with FAs, where a consistent citation style is required. Could you possibly not remove the trailing period so I don't have to go in later add add them back? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 17:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
::Right now, a period at the end of the {{para|vauthors}} parameter causes a [[:Category:CS1 errors: Vancouver style|Vancouver style error]]. Also, there doesn't appear to be a "legal" way to place one there, probably because a period is rendered after the date/year, which is in parentheses after the authors (i.e. having 2 periods doesn't make grammatical sense: <code>Jones B, Smith L. (2001).</code>). If the date/year is absent, then the period is rendered automatically at the end of the author list. If consistency is the goal, then all Vancouver style author lists (even those with 1 author in a non-Vancouver parameter, like {{para|author|Jones B}}, should have their trailing periods removed, not the other way around. Why forsake metadata at the expense of an arbitrary, and incorrect, period? &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 18:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:::As I said, I don't care about metadata (I prefer data). I'll just change vauthors to authors, as that seems to alleviate the "problem". [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
::::Why prefer an arbitrary, incorrect period, then? &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 18:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:::::Your rationale for the presence of the period being "arbitrary and incorrect" is unconvincing. Also, see [[WP:CITEVAR]]. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:::::: Well, parentheses are an aside. (You wouldn't put a period at the end of an aside, with no leading text, would you?).
:::::: This sentence is correct (I hope you see why). &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 19:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
::::::: The author list is a horizontal list, which should have a period at the end to indicate the end of the list. The comparison to a grammatically correct sentence is invalid. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 20:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:::::::: {{edit conflict}} A sentence is a thought. "(2001)" potentially modifies the author-list by potentially disambiguating it from a similar list from an different year, which is why [[WP:CITEREF]] exists, i.e. <code>2001a</code>. However, <code>Jones B, Smith L. (2001).</code> needlessly disjoins the two. I'd concede <code>Jones B, Smith L. 2001.</code> or <code>Jones B, Smith L, 2001.</code>, but I don't think those are options. I'm normally agnostic when it comes to personal style preferences, but only when they make sense, which this doesn't; you can see the consensus throughout WP's citation templates. &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 21:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:::::::: Why does the presence or absence of a trailing period even matter? I am really confused. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
:::::::: On second thought, it is pretty clear that the trailing period does not belong there. {{tl|cite journal}} renders citations as "Author (date)'''<u>.</u>'''". There is already a period after the parenthetical date, hence the trailing period after authors is redundant. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


Per this discussion, [[Help talk:Citation Style 1#Author-list period option for vauthors?]], an author terminal period before a year/date is unanimously disallowed among current Wikipedia citation styles, and you have not expressed any reason to use it, nor provided a link to any such discussion (i.e. an RfC or a WikiProject discussion).

If consistency is your goal, then please defer to the available citation options under normal circumstances (i.e. for most journal cites), or attempt to have the available options changed in your favor (you have not commented there at all, despite being pinged for inclusion). &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 14:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

:I've started a discussion at [[WT:FUNGI#vauthors vs. authors citation style]]. &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</font>&nbsp; 15:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

:: Please explain how the use of {{para|vauthors}} / {{para|veditors}} consistently throughout an article is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fungus&type=revision&diff=722020868&oldid=721923887 inconsistent]. Also it is difficult to believe that the removing a trailing period, especially when it is redundant is a violation of [[WP:CITEVAR]]. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 17:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

:: You [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fungus&type=revision&diff=722051940&oldid=722051184 edit] with the edit summary {{tq|your edit leaves style formatting inconsistent (some authors lists will have ending periods, some not)}} is not correct. I was very careful to remove all inconsistencies and there were none in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fungus&oldid=722051184 version] after my edit. Your reversion of my edit reintroduced inconsistencies. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 17:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

:: The use of trailing periods after the authors is part of the [[Vancouver system]] where it makes grammatical sense since this period separates authors from the title. The combination of {{tl|cite journal}} with {{para|authors}} or {{para|vauthors}} follows neither the [[Vancouver system]] nor the default [[WP:CS1]] style, but is a hybrid. In {{tl|cite journal}}, the date is parenthetically placed after the authors and hence sentence does not end until after the date, and hence it makes sense to place the period after the date. Placing a period before and after the date is redundant. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 18:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

::: I asked a number of good faith questions above. I would appreciate a response. Thanks. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 17:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

== Expert alert ==

Recently one has been https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Cortinarius_species&type=revision&diff=684153510&oldid=679179149 editing] on ''Cortinarius''. She has written about ''C. violaceus'' and close relatives. Just wish I could find one in the wild to photograph...[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 21:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 15, 2016]] ==

With a lead this detailed, it's hard to know what to keep; feel free to twiddle with this. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 00:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for May 29==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Leucocoprinus]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Atta]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Leucocoprinus check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Leucocoprinus fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

== References at [[Yeast]] ==

Hi there User:Sasata! I noticed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yeast&diff=722688395&oldid=722685042 your recent edit] to [[Yeast]] changing most of the |author1=, |author2=... parameters to |authors= (and undoing most of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yeast&diff=prev&oldid=722685042 my recent edit] to the page). The reason I was drawn to the page in the first place was because it had been placed in the maintenance category [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_Multiple_names:_authors_list CS1 maint: Multiple names in authors list]. Having multiple names in the authors' list makes it impossible to extract useful metadata from the citation. Changing the parameter to |authors= instead of |author= will stop the page from triggering this error, but doesn't solve the metadata problem. Based on the conversation on your talk page above, I get the feeling that the metadata issues don't keep you up at night. So I tweaked the citations again so that punctuation after the author list is regular and author formatting is consistent throughout the page (which I hope will make you happy) and authors are split into separate parameters for metadata extraction (which will make me happy). I hope this is a happy compromise for all. If there's something else you'd like to see done with the referencing style, please feel free to let me know and I'd be happy to change it again. Thanks a bunch and happy editing! [[User:Ajpolino|Ajpolino]] ([[User talk:Ajpolino|talk]]) 23:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
:Hello! You seem to have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yeast&diff=722757755&oldid=722753577 reverted my changes] again. I must say I don't understand. Your edit summary was " tweak authors; made formatting more consistent" but the formatting already was consistent. The only difference I can see between [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yeast&diff=722757755&oldid=722753577 your recent revert] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yeast&diff=prev&oldid=722753577 the edit I proposed above] is that your revision kills the metadata (and has a period between the authors and the date, but there's no style guideline requiring that is there?). An explanation would be very much appreciated. Thanks.[[User:Ajpolino|Ajpolino]] ([[User talk:Ajpolino|talk]]) 01:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
::Note: I have started a discussion at [[Talk:Yeast#Reference_Formatting]]. Perhaps that is a more appropriate forum. Again, your comments would be much-appreciated. Thanks. [[User:Ajpolino|Ajpolino]] ([[User talk:Ajpolino|talk]]) 01:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

== Refs ==
In order for the author names to be included in metadata the authors need to be separated. The 'vauthors' parameter is automatically parsed, while the parameter 'authors' is used for those names that are to be excluded. By reverting my edit, you are needlessly removing those authors form metadata. --[[User:Dcirovic|Dcirovic]] ([[User talk:Dcirovic|talk]]) 17:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

==Morchella==

Hi Sasata, i've been going some work trying to bring the [[Morchella]] page up to a good standard and up to date with new publications/research on the genus. However, as i am not very experienced with Wikipedia editing, i could use some help, especially with tidying up the references/bibliography and adding some images. I believe Micheli's old plates will be interesting to upload to the Morchella page, as they are the first-ever images of morels published and rather artistically exaggerated (http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=2801).

Some citations are also needed in the Vernacular names section. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.251.115.89|46.251.115.89]] ([[User talk:46.251.115.89|talk]]) 07:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I think starting some pages of the new and old classical species is also in order and tried to suggest some through "Article Wizatrd", though more need to be included. I have further noticed that many of the existing pages have misidentified images uploaded, which do not correspond to the species discussed. I am not sure how to fix this problem or where to comment about it.

Thanks for your help in advance!

Michael Loizides <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.251.115.89|46.251.115.89]] ([[User talk:46.251.115.89|talk]]) 07:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Hi Michael, I'd be happy to help. I'll upload the Micheli images and tidy the citations later today. As for misidentified ''Morchella'' photos, you can leave a message on the article talk pages, and I or someone else will replace them (it would be good if you had a replacement in mind, from Wikimedia Commons or Mushroom Observer). I will also start creating some of the species that are missing pages. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
:Do you know the specific page(s) for the morel images from the Micheli work that you'd like included? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 18:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sasata, thanks for your positive response and additions. When i find some time i will go through the various Morchella species pages and try to update them, also pointing out any problematic photos. There is one more rather complicated issue that needs fixing:
[[Morchella frustrata]] is confirmed by molecular data in two different papers as a later synonym of Morchlla tridentina. However, no page for Morchella tridentina currently exists, and all taxonomical, nomenclatural and morphological information is included in the M. frustrata page, which is rather confusing and misleading. In my opinion, a page for '''Morchella tridentina''' should be created, and most data transferred to it, after the text is modified accordingly to refer to the new name and page. Some basic information can remain in the M. frustrata page, with also a link to the M. tridentina page. However, since the M. frustrata page is listed as a "Good Article", and such a task requires major deletions/re-arrangements, this is a rather delicate issue, and might be a good idea if it is done by an editor. I would be happy to modify the pages accordingly if you agree with this approach and a M. tridentina page is created.

best regards,
Michael <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.251.115.89|46.251.115.89]] ([[User talk:46.251.115.89|talk]]) 08:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I'll update the ''Morchella frustrata/tridentina'' situation in the next few days; it will require changes to several pages as well as a literature update. I also have a major update and expansion planned for ''[[Morchella tomentosa]]'' too. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 15:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for June 16==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Morchella eohespera]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Washington State]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Morchella_eohespera check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Morchella_eohespera fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

== Protostropharia semiglobata ==

I think your edits are great, but you are reflexively undoing my edit, ignoring the summary and refusing to engage. After to-ing and fro-ing with you I don't wish to keep doing that, since it is not a big deal - but why do you keep doing that?

The first part of my edit is: the common name Kenny G. This seems to have developed on the shroomery website, or that is where it is described, and kids looking for magic mushrooms have a rhyming slang from "semi G" that is also a slightly insulting reference to the artist Kenny G. It is legitimate and the reasons amused me, and I updated it because a group of young foragers used the term with a straight face. I would understand an objection to a relative neologism but asked you to explain.

The second part relates to abbreviating the genus name before it has been referenced there. In the first mention of a species in ''Stropharia'' I simply unabbreviated ''Stropharia''. Again, if that was objectionable I'd have thought you might explain. So I am politely requesting that you discuss that edit. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.28.189.124|86.28.189.124]] ([[User talk:86.28.189.124|talk]]) 11:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It's often difficult to distinguish those who add what seems to be ridiculous information from vandals. See [[wp:RS|reliable sources]] for information on what is required in terms of sourcing requirements on Wikipedia. The vernacular name "Kenny G" will have to have been used in a reliable source for it to be included here. The first ''Stropharia'' is now abbreviated. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata#top|talk]]) 15:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Alright, good, many thanks. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.28.189.124|86.28.189.124]] ([[User talk:86.28.189.124|talk]]) 18:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Macrocybe has been nominated for Did You Know==
{{ivmbox
| 1 = Hello, Sasata. <!--
--><!-- empty --><!--
-->[[Macrocybe]], an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,<!--
-->has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's [[Main Page]] as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion <!--
-->'''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Macrocybe|here]]'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. [[User:APersonBot|APersonBot]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APersonBot|talk!]]) 12:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
|2=Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
}}<!-- Template:DYKNom -->

==DYK for Bondarzewia berkeleyi==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#23 June 2016|23 June 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Bondarzewia berkeleyi]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Bondarzewia berkeleyi|stump blossoms]]''' can cause [[butt rot]]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bondarzewia berkeleyi]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-06-13&end=2016-07-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bondarzewia_berkeleyi Bondarzewia berkeleyi])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

==DYK for Macrocybe==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#27 June 2016|27 June 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Macrocybe]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the weight of a clump of mushrooms of the tropical genus '''''[[Macrocybe]]''''' can exceed {{convert|30|kg|abbr=on}}?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Macrocybe]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-06-17&end=2016-07-07&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Macrocybe Macrocybe])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 16:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

== Precious anniversary ==

{{User QAIbox
| title = Four years ago ...
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
| image_upright = 0.2
| bold = featured pictures of funghi
| normal = ... you were recipient<br /> no. '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#Sasata|175]]''' of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious|Precious]],<br /> a prize of QAI!
}}
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:51, 12 July 2016

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sasata&oldid=729495386"