Talk:List of reference routes in New York: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assess list class
→‎915Q?: Added info~~~~
Line 75: Line 75:


The latest NYSDOT [https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/technical-services-repository/pavement/2015%20pdr%20reg1.pdf pavement data report] shows a new route, SR 915Q in Schenectady County. There doesn't seem to be any actual data entered for it, just a "begin" line showing that it starts from US 20. Any other citations for this route? I'm guessing this must be the I-88 connector to US 20 and NY 7, which is otherwise unnumbered (reference markers show it as a ramp of I-88). [[User:ESRoads|ESRoads]] ([[User talk:ESRoads|talk]]) 16:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
The latest NYSDOT [https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/technical-services-repository/pavement/2015%20pdr%20reg1.pdf pavement data report] shows a new route, SR 915Q in Schenectady County. There doesn't seem to be any actual data entered for it, just a "begin" line showing that it starts from US 20. Any other citations for this route? I'm guessing this must be the I-88 connector to US 20 and NY 7, which is otherwise unnumbered (reference markers show it as a ramp of I-88). [[User:ESRoads|ESRoads]] ([[User talk:ESRoads|talk]]) 16:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

: The 2017 Highway Inventory describes it as the "I-88 Exit 24 Conn," and extends it from US 20 over I-88 to NY Route 7. <ref>(https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/highway-data-services/inventory-listing)</ref> ''[[user:Triskele_Jim|Triskele Jim]]'' 15:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 15:49, 24 April 2019

WikiProject iconNew York (state) List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconU.S. Roads: New York List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations
 New York  
 

907G

I've encountered a reference to a Route 907G when looking up junctions for the Sprain Brook Parkway. I think it refers to the Bronx River Parkway in Westchester County south of the junction with the Sprain Brook but I'm not sure. Can anybody verify this? --Polaron | Talk 16:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to [1], the Bronx River Pkwy. is 907H. What's real interesting is that the Empire State Roads page makes no reference to a 907G. --TMF T - C 16:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
907H is the Bronx portion of the BRP. Most of the BRP in Westchester is county maintained but I think the southernmost section is still state maintained but I'm not sure. --Polaron | Talk 16:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another source though does refer to a route 907G: [2] (PDF) (see page 46). Hopefully that can be of assistance. --TMF T - C 16:55, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that the part of the Bronx River Parkway from the city line to the Sprain is state-maintained, but under a different refernce number than the city part. I think the rest, up to the kensico circle, is county maintained. --Chris 16:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


explanation of sign

We all know that the top four digits are the Reference Route No. But the article seems not to cover the meaning of the second and third rows. I'm somewhat of a novice Wikipedian, but I'm surprised there isn't a seperate stub explaining the sign. --{{User:Coryma}} 23:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I someday hope to create such an article (in my opinion, the marker legend itself merits its own article). But done simply, the second row is a county designator (first digit the DOT region number, the second the alphabetical order of that county within said region, as of the date of reference, and third & fourth being an incremental sequence of counties of progression starting at ”01”). The third row is actual inventory; first digit being control segment, starting at 1 within a county and incrementing every time a city line is crossed, and the other three being (in the simplest of terms) roughly tenths of a mile from the beginning of that segment, south to north or west to east. There's a lot more to this but in a nutshell, this describes what all those digits mean. The markers are there to inventory one-tenth mile segments of highway, not to act as tenth-mile markers. Fwgoebel 01:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Older system of numbering

Some of these are mentioned in state laws, for instance Route 903. The match for Route 901 appears to be a typo for 90I. Other probable typos are 854 (254), 960 (something in Bath), 962 (something in New Windsor, 967 (something in New Windsor), 998 (98). --NE2 07:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any old reference numbers for the Park Roads of the Palisades Interstate Park System, such as those in Bear Mountain State Park and Harriman State Park? ----DanTD (talk) 19:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do any of these links (excluding NE2's first link) work for anyone? All of these "westlaw" links lead me to a page that reads "You have requested a page that is not supported by this site.". --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Odd, I'll fix this in the morning.Mitch32contribs 02:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A link which appears to lead to the NYCRR links above is here. – TMF 04:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I guess not. The "free" version doesn't appear to have the portions of Title 15 that contain the route references. – TMF 04:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

908V

[3] shows that Woodhaven Boulevard is 908V, but is not state maintained. [4] also shows it. --NE2 01:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

910 F

910F is Fuller Road Alternate and not technically the Adirondack Northway which only starts at exit 1 when I-87 is picked up. This is confirmed by numerous references on local news channels and media such as the Times Union, examples [5] and "Officially, this Northway extension is called Fuller Road Alternate and Route 910F" as stated in [this http://archives.timesunion.com/mweb/wmsql.wm.request?oneimage&imageid=6395517] TU story.Camelbinky (talk) 01:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that this is far from the only article on Wikipedia that refers to NY 910F as the Northway. – TMF 08:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

915Q?

The latest NYSDOT pavement data report shows a new route, SR 915Q in Schenectady County. There doesn't seem to be any actual data entered for it, just a "begin" line showing that it starts from US 20. Any other citations for this route? I'm guessing this must be the I-88 connector to US 20 and NY 7, which is otherwise unnumbered (reference markers show it as a ramp of I-88). ESRoads (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 2017 Highway Inventory describes it as the "I-88 Exit 24 Conn," and extends it from US 20 over I-88 to NY Route 7. [1] Triskele Jim 15:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of reference routes in New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]