User talk:Ral315/Archive 20
|
Support Our Families
You deleted Support Our Families saying it was a recreation of a deleted article. The only thing the same between what you deleted and the deleted article was the title support our families. What brought your attention to it and why did you delete it? Steve.fami.ly 07:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
If you would be willing to restore the listing I would be willing to remove the reference for which you accuse me of being promotional and rewrite the entire article appropriately - also, I wouldn't have a problem with working in a sandbox area on it until it met your standards - I don't know if you have this kind of a feature or not but it seems like it would be useful considering the headache I have had trying to contribute a valid political slogan in the main namespace. Thank you. Steve.fami.ly 17:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I started a new article for support our families and put it in the category political terms instead of political slogans. Could you paste the first paragraph of my last article (including references) to the bottom of this sandbox? I was thinking of using a couple of sentences from it as part of a history section. Thanks Steve.fami.ly 18:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Your Edits
Ral315. It's sad that you make deletions to things for which you obviously have no knowledge in. I've already conversed with multiple moderators regarding All in the Family entries and you delete them anyways. Sad. Be careful, your edits regress Wikipedia for those topics unclear to you. --Edlisataylor 04:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Nofollow
I'd have to dig for the exact context in which he said it, I was basically cribbing from my story of two years ago. If it was in a post to wikien-l, or an edit on Wikipedia, he may well not have specified exactly but still mostly had the English Wikipedia in mind. Supposing that projects are allowed to choose different courses of action on an issue, then Jimmy isn't always in the best position to know what's the best course of action for non-English projects, and it's particularly the English Wikipedia on which he has a special role to influence such things, regardless of office or title. --Michael Snow 05:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
RfC -- Attack Pages
I noticed that back in october you changed the attack pages guideline. I opened an RfC regarding the unintended consenquences of that change, and I'm interested in knowing what precident precipitated the change (or why). I hope we can get your input at the RfC I opened. Thanks! /Blaxthos 07:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost
I just spoke to Trodel about helping him to do ITN. This could help me write the Wikiproject Report. What do you think? -- Punk Boi 8 07:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- This was not approved by me - no need for you to respond --Trödel 14:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Digest feedback
You asked for feedback, so here's some. I think having the full text of articles in the digest would encourage me to read more articles, but because emails don't have wikilinks, it discourages me from exploring further into the matter. Goes in one ear, gets a little bit of thought, then gets DELETED! Hmmm. — JeremyTalk 10:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
signpost - John F. Street v. Bozo the clown
That wasn't the 1st addition of the clown entry, it looks like it was added once before [1] and stayed for *6* days! -Ravedave (Adopt a State) 16:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
about deletion of List of tools for static code analysis
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of tools for static code analysis. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I don't think 10 minutes discussion was enough to delete the page! Cate | Talk 18:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
image on wikinews - n:Image:Olympic rings.png
I'm going through the images in the english wikinews, deleting all the badly sourced images, duplicates, etc. Is their a reason for this image, or can I change it to the svg version? Bawolff 02:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Itsnotagame.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Itsnotagame.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Clevelandcover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Clevelandcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Thugstories.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Thugstories.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Hi, Ral315. The problem continues, the last version was not posted to me. Could you please check this again? Thanx. E104421 20:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Why the bot skips mine not any other? I'm wondering whether this is a random or systematic error? Should i re-subscribe? Regards. E104421 03:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Nathanrdotcom
Just so you know, I'm happy to subscribe to your cleanup of the report. David Mestel(Talk) 15:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Fair 'nuff. Oh, and check your e-mail ;). David Mestel(Talk) 15:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Just wondering but did you forget to delete the template as per Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#January 21. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikiality vandals
Vandalism at Wikiality - suggest revert/protect. - JustinWick 04:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Also Truth and likely many other related items. - JustinWick 04:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)