User talk:KyleJoan

Leave a message, and I'll get back to you. Cheers, Wikipedians!
-KyleJoan

Archives

0 1 2 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Kristen Stewart

Hi, rather than engage in an edit war is it really that important to add a small not really relevant comment in 2022 from 2021 as this is now 2022 and that was a decade ago.

Obviously you may disagree with my alterations but is there a better or more relevant way of working this out?

Juanpumpchump (talk) 13:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Juanpumpchump: That material has been in the article for years, so you must obtain a consensus to remove it, which seems like the best and most relevant way of working this out. When you open the discussion, please specify the timeframe that you believe meets your criteria for relevancy. The valid WP:OTHERSTUFF examples you provided, seen here, supports including that material, so it is up to you to explain why it should be included in some articles but not others. Thanks. KyleJoan 13:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted - I'll leave it at that!

Juanpumpchump (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Removing "currently" from the lead of articles about pro wrestlers --Mann Mann (talk) 04:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, KyleJoan!

Happy New Year!

KyleJoan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Mann Mann (talk) 04:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@Mann Mann: Thank you very much. This is very kind of you. I hope you have a wonderful 2023 as well! KyleJoan 17:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Sawayama

Hi, I'm sorry I didn't reply for almost a year. I don't think I noticed getting a notification in your response on the talk page. Again, I'm very sorry for that but I've responded now. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sonya Deville

Hello KyleJoan. How are you? Would you please review Sonya Deville#Personal life? Especially the recent content about her arrest. BTW, have you stopped editing PW articles? --Mann Mann (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear from you, Mann Mann. I'm well, thank you for asking. How about yourself? I took a look and made (what I believe are) appropriate changes. I haven't been editing on the topic of wrestling as much in recent times, but I'm always happy to help. Have a great rest of your week! KyleJoan 12:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine, thank you. Your changes look good. Please keep contributing to PW articles. Have a good time. Cheers! --Mann Mann (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Egerton

If you have a problem with any particular edit, you may discuss it at the article's talk page. But wholesame reverting WP:RS edits is unacceptable. Also, please don't leave me messages asking for an edit summary, when each edit I made has a summary. Do you not understand what "ce" stands for? X4n6 (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@X4n6: If you are reverted, you may discuss it at the article's talk page. What's unacceptable is falsely claiming there is consensus for your edit when there is not. I did not ask you for any edit summary. I suggested writing an accurate one. KyleJoan 08:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. X4n6 (talk) 11:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]