Talk:Mary Dennett

Biography: Politics and Government B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Feminism B‑class Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is there no mention of May Dennett's views on eugenics? Seems pertinent. Havalynii (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Her views on eugenics were utterly unremarkable at the time - even birth control opponents often advocated much more extreme positions on eugenics than Dennett, including forcible sterilization. Dennett's arguments were based primarily on quality of life and self-determination rather than eugenics. Of course, feel free to add information about it if you're so motivated. Catavar (talk) 08:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a pretty fantastic improvement effort recently! One observation, if there are other good sources available, ideally an article shouldn't rely too heavily on any single source. So if it's possible to work in some footnotes to other reliable sources, that would be good; but only if good ones exist! -Pete (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]