User talk:Formerlychucks
January 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wojak, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'll admit it, i didnt have sources for that Formerlychucks (talk) 16:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Clickhole, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ridiculous Formerlychucks (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't 4chan or ED. If the disruptive behavior continue sactions may be issued. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- “this isn’t 4chan or ED” then why was @JPxG made an admin? He frequently uses these dogwhistles in talk pages. HaytchT (talk) 01:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't 4chan or ED. If the disruptive behavior continue sactions may be issued. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @OhNoitsJamie: You're a *******. 2.99.113.34 (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- [I AM NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PERSON] Formerlychucks (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Formerlychucks here, I am a BIPOC trans queen btw. though 2A00:F41:28BA:8C47:1531:530A:8966:6610 (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- [I AM NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PERSON] Formerlychucks (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Friendly note
In this edit, you change a named citation and replaced it with a new citation. If you are using the visual diff view, you can change to the wikitext view to see what the visual editor did. I just tried using the visual editor and it looks like it says This reference is defined in a template or other generated block, and for now can only be edited in source mode.
Usually, we add additional parameters to the existing reference, but in this case it wasn't possible with the visual editor. I've fixed it, but please take note of it the next time you encounter a source like this. Note that there's also an online tool that can help you automate this process of rescuing dead sources with the Internet Archive here. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 12:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Formerlychucks (talk) 13:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)