Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Rio Grande 223 | 19 March 2024 | 0/0/0 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | Motion | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
Clarification request: Extended confirmed restriction | none | none | 29 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Rio Grande 223
Initiated by DTParker1000 (talk) at 20:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Proposed parties
- DTParker1000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Xboxtravis7992 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification Xboxtravis7992]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by DTParker1000
Statement by Xboxtravis7992
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Rio Grande 223: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Rio Grande 223: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)