User talk:Renamed user 7aef79ad6a85ea8e0f85754cb4d4a1a456711e2a07cec57fd3c469f472bb41e6

March 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Demetrios1993 Hello! Yes I will see. Have I done added any false information to a page? If so then please tell me where. Thank you too. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Markos Botsaris, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Markos Botsaris. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Markos Botsaris, you may be blocked from editing. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andi Atdhetari! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Worry beads that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtrrs0 I am sorry about that. Is it going to be reverted? Thank you. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have, yes. Not for incorrectly marking it as minor but because I see no good reason to remove the references to greek culture and language. Eg with the etymology of the word in that article you removed a sourced etymology for an unsourced one that accords with what you have been doing in other articles. Respectfully, it could seem you are here to promote an agenda. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtrrs0 Well sorry. I read that etymology in a book on Google Reads, but I couldn't find it so I just didn't put a source. Also, I removed some that credited the Greek culture, because worry beads are more usual and more in practice in other Mediterranean and Arabic countries. Sorry. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with those edits if you have good sources for them! Jtrrs0 (talk) 22:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtrrs0 Good. I have a question. I have found sources for some of the pages that I edited, that are now reverted. Do I put them on the referenced page? Thanks. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If you have sources, feel free to make your edits. This page provides a good explanation of how to do it. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtrrs0 Thank you a lot. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help! Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fier article edits

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. RoyalHeritageAlb (talk) 20:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious Topic

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. I really want to emphasise that this notice is just a courtesy to make sure you are aware that you have to be extra careful when editing articles like the Markos Botsaris article.

Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Andi Atdhetari! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade

Hello! I want to thank you a lot for this. I do not know a lot about Wikipedia editing, except the editing itself, and making a new page which I just found out how to do today. Again, thank you a lot. Happy editing too! Andi Atdhetari (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theory Of Every Language moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Theory Of Every Language. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade

Hello, no problem. The Albanian historian Agron Dalipaj has written some books, and in one or two of these, he talks about this theory. I will add them to the referenced page, and then put it up for review. Thank you! Andi Atdhetari (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theory Of Every Language (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Theory Of Every Language and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I put all of the sources of this theory on the referenced page. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andi Atdhetari! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel Thank you! Andi Atdhetari (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I am still wondering why my page is not accepted. I have written it from a neutral point of view, and I cited the books in the referenced page. What have I done wrong? Andi Atdhetari (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to explain it any better than I already have done. If you can provide better sources, then you are welcome to resubmit the draft for review. Wikishovel (talk) 21:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I myself have cited the sources in the referenced page. I do not have the books of that author, so I cannot cite the exact page where he talks about this theory, but I have personally talked with the author in messenger about this theory, and he infact has talked me about his books, 2-3 of them in which he talks about this theory. Those are the ones that I have put in the referenced pags. How can I do better? Andi Atdhetari (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it's the sort of theory that WP: Original research is needed to discover, then it's not within the scope of an encyclopedia. Wikishovel (talk) 12:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Albanians in 1881 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Albanians in 1881. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Albanianism, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 12:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Albanianism, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 19:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Oratio Dominica. Wikishovel (talk) 10:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Religion in Albania, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel Damn, my bad bud. I just translated that part from the Italian one in English. Didn't know it was weong though. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Albania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orthodox and Study. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name assimilation in Albania moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Name assimilation in Albania. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dead Serb is a Good Serb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dead Serb is a Good Serb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CCWikiMan (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Dead Serb is a Good Serb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Dead Serb is a Good Serb. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Anti-Serb sentiment. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Anti-Serb sentiment. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louis Pasteur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homesick.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of History of The Greek Revolution

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on History of The Greek Revolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of The Greek Revolution moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to History of The Greek Revolution. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]