Talk:Amanda Peet

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Weasel words

"Many have speculated..." I would like to see a notable citation on this. --Abu Badali 16:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the whole paragraph is pretty bad. James 21:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo?

Hmm, we need a photo. Someone get one! :) --Viper007Bond 06:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a sunglare effect on the photo? --Vylen (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Translation Request ————

Amanda Peet →

Amanda Peet ———— (more info)

Translation status: Stage 1 : Request (How-to)
Comment: Starkiller88 13:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Requested by: Starkiller88 13:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Interest of the translation: Because this article is good enough, because it contains cited references, good grammar, etc.

Join this translation ———— Update this information (instructions)

Ashton Kutcher

Didn't she date Ashton Kutcher? 207.179.153.152 (talk) 01:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cookie Magazine interview

If we can include this material at all, we need to be very cautious of WP:BLP. Additionally, we need to be careful of not including original research, nor of violating WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE.

I've trimmed it back, and fact-tagged "enormous uproar." In cases like this, if we cannot find other reliable sources beyond Cookie Magazine itself, we're best removing all discussion of the interview. --Ronz (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it until the other involved editors join this discussion. --Ronz (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please discuss the references that have been offered, as well as discussing new references. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.mothering.com/discussions/showthread.php?p=11714868&posted=1#post11714868

This fails WP:RS, as well as WP:EL and WP:COI for that matter. --Ronz (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://perezhilton.com/2008-07-17-amanda-peet-causes-a-stir

This also fails RS and EL. --Ronz (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/07/15/amanda_peet/

This is just a blog at Salon, correct? If so, it fails RS and EL. --Ronz (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/marc_malkin/b146909_amanda_peet_says_sorrysorta.html

Looks like more of the same. --Ronz (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/realitybase/2008/07/11/autism-and-vaccinations-a-celebrity-smackdown/

More of the same. --Ronz (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, blogs hosted by established, reputable publishing firms such as Salon/Discover can be considered reliable sources. More to the point in this case, I believe, is that this is entirely tangential to her life and career, and is, at this point, nothing more than an unencyclopedic footnote. If she turns into some nationally-known vaccination crusader, that would be different. But if this is all there is... then there is no there, there. FCYTravis (talk) 22:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]