(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Fantasy Black Channel - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Fantasy Black Channel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timmeh (talk | contribs) at 15:45, 23 May 2009 (GA for Wikiprojects). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAlbums GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAlternative music GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconElectronic music GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fantasy Black Channel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello Rafablu88. I'll be reviewing this article per your request. I should be finished by Saturday if not earlier. Timmeh!(review me) 01:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I don't envisage any problems that would leave it hanging until or after Saturday. I've gone over and over with a fine comb. I might send it for FA review after. Fingers crossed. Off to bed now (UK time). Enjoy the read. Rafablu88 (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist and analysis

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    As with every GA nominee I've reviewed, I've had to fix some minor formatting and grammatical errors, but there was nothing major.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    These are all good for GA.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Talks about all the major aspects of the album: its history, musical style, reception, release, etc.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I'm passing this for GA, as it complies with all the requirements. Good luck taking it to FA. Timmeh!(review me) 15:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments