User talk:Miyagawa

Star Trek

Hi there. On the Star Trek matter, I left a note on the ANI thread. I'm just popping by here because I left several pings in that edit and I wasn't sure if all those I pinged got the pings. No worries if you did get it, but there are several pings I should follow up from a while ago that I got no answer to if there is some problem with pings. About Star Trek and academic papers and books, do they get used much in Wikipedia articles? I left a note on David Fuch's talk page as well, but I've just realised that the Star Trek WikiProject talk page would be a better place to go. I might do that, but may wait to see what you and David say first. Carcharoth (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where they're available they are. I've certainly used them in a few different articles, but I only have access to the ones on Questia and Google Books. In fact I used one only the other day in Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) - there's a paragraph under critical reception. That article is still being put together so there's a fair few gaps in coverage yet. Miyagawa (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. If I get back to this, I'll try and see where I can help. Not sure whether the approach of citing various papers in the Star Trek article themselves is sufficient, or an article giving an overview of academic trends (if people have written overviews). Thematic articles like Sexuality in Star Trek, though I might be thinking of something more like Tolkien research. Anyway... Maybe later! Carcharoth (talk) 22:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

biscuits and gravy

Hello Miyagawa. I suspect that the user, biscuits and gravy has sock puppet accounts. More specifically, Bojangles and I love my lips.Skate Shady - talk to me 18:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on them. Miyagawa (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Skate Shady - talk to me 19:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.

It was a misunderstanding on my part regarding the WikiCup...no foul play or underhanded tactics were meant. Vjmlhds (talk) 21:54, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 03:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2004 Emmy Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for closing/promoting my DYK. For some reason the template will not show up on the article's talk page. Any thoughts?--Godot13 (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prep1

Hi, you recently promoted hook from Template:Did you know nominations/Darshan Singh Pheruman to Prep1. Can you please change the hook to ALT1, because that is the one, me and the reviewer agreed on

ALT1: ... that Sikh politician Darshan Singh Pheruman died after 74 days on hunger strike, demanding inclusion of Chandigarh and other Punjabi speaking areas into Punjab?

Thanks. --User:Vigyani 01:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]