Original enlightenment: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''Original enlightenment''' or '''innate awakening''' ({{cjkv|c=もとさとし|p=běnjué|rr=bongak|r=hongaku}}) is an [[East Asian Buddhism|East Asian Buddhist doctrine]] often translated as "inherent", "innate", "intrinsic" or "original" [[Enlightenment (spiritual)|enlightenment]] / awakening (Sanskrit: ''[[Enlightenment in Buddhism|bodhi]]'').<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2007-12-15 |title=original enlightenment, もとさとし |url=http://www.buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?q=%E6%9C%AC%E8%A6%BA |access-date=2024-05-03 |website=Digital Dictionary of Buddhism}}</ref>
'''Original enlightenment''' or '''innate awakening''' ({{cjkv|c=もとさとし|p=běnjué|rr=bongak|r=hongaku}}) is an [[East Asian Buddhism|East Asian Buddhist doctrine]] often translated as "inherent", "innate", "intrinsic" or "original" [[Enlightenment (spiritual)|enlightenment]] / awakening (Sanskrit: ''[[Enlightenment in Buddhism|bodhi]]'').<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2007-12-15 |title=original enlightenment, もとさとし |url=http://www.buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?q=%E6%9C%AC%E8%A6%BA |access-date=2024-05-03 |website=Digital Dictionary of Buddhism}}</ref>


This doctrine holds all sentient beings are already enlightened or awakened in some way. In this view, since all beings have some kind of awakening as their true nature, the attainment of awakening is a process of discovering and recognizing what is already present, not of attaining something distant and external, or of constructing something new.<ref name=":0" /> Original enlightenment is often contrasted with “acquired enlightenment” or "initial enlightenment" (はじめさとし, pinyin: ''shijué'', Japanese: ''shikaku''), which is a relative experience that is attained through Buddhist practices and teachings.<ref>{{Citation |last=Nagatomo |first=Shigenori |title=Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy |date=2024 |work=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/japanese-zen/ |access-date=2024-05-03 |edition=Spring 2024 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |editor2-last=Nodelman |editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> Inherent enlightenment was also often associated with the teachings of [[subitism| sudden enlightenment]].
This doctrine holds all sentient beings are already enlightened or awakened in some way. In this view, since all beings have some kind of awakening as their true nature, the attainment of awakening is a process of discovering and recognizing what is already present, not of attaining something distant and external, or of constructing something new.<ref name=":0" /> Original enlightenment is often contrasted with “acquired enlightenment” or "initial enlightenment" (はじめさとし, pinyin: ''shijué'', Japanese: ''shikaku''), which is a relative experience that is attained through Buddhist practices and teachings.<ref>{{Citation |last=Nagatomo |first=Shigenori |title=Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy |date=2024 |work=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/japanese-zen/ |access-date=2024-05-03 |edition=Spring 2024 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |editor2-last=Nodelman |editor2-first=Uri}}</ref>


Original enlightenment thought is related to Indian Buddhist concepts like [[Buddha-nature]] and the [[luminous mind]]. The doctrine is articulated in influential East Asian works like the ''[[Awakening of Faith in the Mahayana|Awakening of Faith]]'' and the ''[[Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment]]''.<ref name=":0" />
Original enlightenment thought is related to Indian Buddhist concepts like [[Buddha-nature]] and the [[luminous mind]]. The doctrine is articulated in influential East Asian works like the ''[[Awakening of Faith in the Mahayana|Awakening of Faith]]'' and the ''[[Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment]]''.<ref name=":0" />


Original enlightenment is an influential doctrine of various schools of East Asian Buddhism, including [[Chan Buddhism|Chinese Chan]], and [[Huayan]]. The idea was also important for [[Korean Buddhism]], especially [[Korean Seon]]. It was a central teaching in medieval Japanese Buddhist traditions like [[Shingon Buddhism|Shingon]], [[Tendai]], and [[Japanese Zen]].
Original enlightenment is an influential doctrine of various schools of East Asian Buddhism, including [[Chan Buddhism|Chinese Chan]], and [[Huayan]]. Inherent enlightenment was also often associated with the teachings of [[subitism| sudden enlightenment]] which was influential for [[Zen|Zen Buddhism]]. The original enlightenment idea was also important for [[Korean Buddhism]], especially [[Korean Seon]]. It was a central teaching in medieval Japanese Buddhist traditions like [[Shingon Buddhism|Shingon]], [[Tendai]], and also for some of the new [[Kamakura period|Kamakura schools]] like [[Japanese Zen]].


==History==
==History==

Revision as of 00:44, 4 May 2024

Original enlightenment or innate awakening (Chinese: もとさとし; pinyin: běnjué; Japanese pronunciation: hongaku; Korean pronunciation: bongak) is an East Asian Buddhist doctrine often translated as "inherent", "innate", "intrinsic" or "original" enlightenment / awakening (Sanskrit: bodhi).[1]

This doctrine holds all sentient beings are already enlightened or awakened in some way. In this view, since all beings have some kind of awakening as their true nature, the attainment of awakening is a process of discovering and recognizing what is already present, not of attaining something distant and external, or of constructing something new.[1] Original enlightenment is often contrasted with “acquired enlightenment” or "initial enlightenment" (はじめさとし, pinyin: shijué, Japanese: shikaku), which is a relative experience that is attained through Buddhist practices and teachings.[2]

Original enlightenment thought is related to Indian Buddhist concepts like Buddha-nature and the luminous mind. The doctrine is articulated in influential East Asian works like the Awakening of Faith and the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment.[1]

Original enlightenment is an influential doctrine of various schools of East Asian Buddhism, including Chinese Chan, and Huayan. Inherent enlightenment was also often associated with the teachings of sudden enlightenment which was influential for Zen Buddhism. The original enlightenment idea was also important for Korean Buddhism, especially Korean Seon. It was a central teaching in medieval Japanese Buddhist traditions like Shingon, Tendai, and also for some of the new Kamakura schools like Japanese Zen.

History

Origins in China

The doctrine of innate enlightenment developed in Chinese Buddhism out various Indian Mahayana ideas, such as the Buddha-nature (tathagatagarbha) doctrine, the luminous mind and the teachings found in various Mahayana sources, including the Śūraṅgama Sūtra, Ghanavyuha, Śrīmālādevī, Tathagatagarbha sutra, Nirvana sutra, and the Ratnagotravibhāga.[3]

The Chinese term itself is first mentioned in the Mahayana Awakening of Faith treatise (Dàshéng Qǐxìn Lùn; c. 6th century).[4] According to this treatise:

The essence of Mind is free from thoughts. The characteristic of that which is free from thoughts is analogous to that of the sphere of empty space that pervades everywhere. The one aspect of the world of reality (dharmadhātu) is none other than the undifferentiated Dharma body [dharmakāya], the “essence body” of the Tathāgata. [Since the essence of Mind is] grounded on the dharmakāya, it is to be called the original enlightenment. Why? Because “original enlightenment” indicates [the essence of Mind] in contradistinction to [the essence of Mind in] the process of the actualization of enlightenment; the process of actualization of enlightenment is none other than [the process of integrating] the identity with the original enlightenment.[5]

According to Jacqueline Stone, The Awakening of Faith sees original enlightenment as "true suchness considered under the aspect of conventional deluded consciousness and thus denotes the potential for enlightenment in unenlightened beings."[6] Original enlightenment is also found in other influential East Asian works, like the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment and the Vajrasamadhi Sutra. The doctrine is also a common theme of the Platform Sutra of Huineng and was taught by Chinese Chan masters as "seeing original nature".

In medieval China, the doctrine developed in the East Asian Yogacara, Huayan and Chan Buddhist schools. The influential Huayan-Chan scholar, Guifeng Zongmi, cites various Indian Mahayana sources for this idea. He cites a passage from the Avatamsaka Sutra which states "'When one first raises the thought [of awakening], one attains unexcelled, perfect awakening.'" He also cites the Nirvana Sutra, which states: "The two, raising the thought [of awakening] and the ultimate, are not separate."[7]

Korean figures like Wŏnhyo introduced the concept to Korean Buddhism, where it also had a considerable impact.

In Japanese Buddhism

The first Japanese to write of this doctrine was Kūkai (774–835), founder of Shingon Buddhism.

The doctrine of innate enlightenment was very influential in Tendai from the cloistered rule era (1086–1185) through the Edo period (1688–1735).[6] The Tendai view of hongaku saw it as encompassing not only all sentient beings, but all living things and all nature, even inanimate objects - all were considered to be Buddha. This also includes all our actions and thoughts, even our deluded thoughts, as expressions of our innately enlightened nature.[6]

Tamura Yoshirõ (1921–1989) saw original enlightenment thought (もとさとし思想しそう, hongaku shisō) as being defined by two major philosophical elements.[8] One was a radical non-dualism, in which everything was seen as empty and interconnected, so that the differences between ordinary person and Buddha and all other distinctions, were ontologically negated. The other feature of hongaku was the affirmation of the phenomenal world as an expression of the nondual realm of Buddha nature. This was expressed in phrases such as “the worldly passions are precisely enlightenment” and “birth and death are precisely nirvana.”[6]

The Tendai doctrine of hongaku had deep impact on the development of New Kamakura Buddhism, for many of those who founded new Kamakura Buddhist schools (Eisai, Honen, Shinran, Dogen and Nichiren) studied Tendai at Mount Hiei.[6]

During the 1980s a Japanese movement known as Critical Buddhism has attacked original enlightenment as an ideology that supports the status quo and legitimates social injustice by accepting all things as they are as expressions of original Buddha nature.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "original enlightenment, もとさとし". Digital Dictionary of Buddhism. 2007-12-15. Retrieved 2024-05-03.
  2. ^ Nagatomo, Shigenori (2024), Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2024-05-03
  3. ^ Gregory, Peter N. (2002), Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism, p. 167. University of Hawai’i Press, Kuroda Institute, (originally published Princeton University Press, 1991, Princeton, N.J.), ISBN 0-8248-2623-X
  4. ^ Sueki Fumihiko, "Two Seemingly Contradictory Aspects of the Teaching of Innate Enlightenment (hongaku) in Medieval Japan", Japanese Journal of Religious Study 22 (1-2), pp. 3-16, 1995. PDF
  5. ^ "original enlightenment - Buddha-Nature". buddhanature.tsadra.org. Retrieved 2024-05-03.
  6. ^ a b c d e Stone, Jacqueline (1 May 1995). "Medieval Tendai hongaku thought and the new Kamakura Buddhism: A reconsideration". Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 22 (1–2). doi:10.18874/jjrs.22.1-2.1995.17-48.
  7. ^ Broughton, Jeffrey (2009), Zongmi on Chan, p. 39. New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-14392-9
  8. ^ Tamura Yoshirō (1987), Japanese culture and the Tendai concept of original enlightenment, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 14 (2-3), 203-205 PDF
  9. ^ Hubbard, Jamie; Swanson, Paul Loren (1997). Pruning the Bodhi Tree: The Storm Over Critical Buddhism. University of Hawaii Press. p. 290. ISBN 9780824819491.

Further reading

See also