User contributions for 130.231.248.11

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:0518:05, 19 June 2022 diff hist +1,269‎ Solar cycle ‎ the arguments for the rejection of the correction were not clear Tag: Reverted
08:3308:33, 19 June 2022 diff hist +1,170‎ Solar cycle ‎ Undid revision 1093863752 by William M. Connolley (talk) -- it was not said earlier that the statistic of 11-solar cycles was nearly tripled recently using 14C data. Holocene-long reconstructions do not resolve individual 11-year cycles. Over-enthusiasm has been removed.. Tag: Reverted
06:5406:54, 19 June 2022 diff hist +1,232‎ Solar cycle ‎ Undid revision 1093747816 by CoronalMassAffection (talk) --> the extension of the known cycle information covering 1000 years (96 cycles) is important. I didn't find it mentioned elsewhere in this article Tag: Reverted

05:5705:57, 19 April 2022 diff hist +9‎ Quickborn ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted

15:5715:57, 13 April 2022 diff hist −254‎ Obersulm ‎ Removed information that is not about Obersulm. Tags: Reverted section blanking

18:5518:55, 14 June 2020 diff hist −624‎ Solar cycle 25 ‎ Reference to retracted paper by Zharkova et al. was removed. Tag: references removed

07:3507:35, 21 August 2019 diff hist −570‎ RX J0852.0−4622 ‎ Reference to a highly speculative claim of "observing SN1054 in ice cores" is removed. The result was never confirmed, and, as shown by Pavlov et al. (MNRAS 435, 2878–2884, 2013), gamma-ray emission from a SN cannot produce a noticeable amount of 10Be in the Earth's atmosphere.