User contributions for 71.182.244.158

9 November 2009

• 01:2301:23, 9 November 2009 diff hist +10‎ Talk:Ricci curvature ‎ correction →‎Geometrical Meaning
• 01:2301:23, 9 November 2009 diff hist +810‎ Talk:Ricci curvature ‎ details →‎Geometrical Meaning

8 November 2009

• 23:4723:47, 8 November 2009 diff hist +43‎ Symbol of a differential operator ‎ also known as the '''principal symbol''' →‎Operators on Euclidean space
• 22:0222:02, 8 November 2009 diff hist −14‎ User talk:Paradoctor ‎ Ooo. It's still there. →‎Paradoxes of infinity
• 22:0122:01, 8 November 2009 diff hist +727‎ User talk:Paradoctor ‎ →‎Paradoxes of infinity: new section
• 21:3821:38, 8 November 2009 diff hist +557‎ Talk:Symbol of a differential operator ‎ r
• 21:1821:18, 8 November 2009 diff hist −11‎ Tycho Brahe ‎ ce →‎Tycho's observational astronomy
• 21:0821:08, 8 November 2009 diff hist −160‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ it *could* be seen in this way. But odds are good that it *wouldn't* be. →‎Proof that 2πぱい = 0
• 21:0421:04, 8 November 2009 diff hist +624‎ User talk:SteveMcCluskey ‎ →‎Tycho Brahe apparently under siege: new section
• 20:5820:58, 8 November 2009 diff hist +700‎ Tycho Brahe ‎ reintroduced sentence from earlier version on sources of systematic error. →‎Tycho's observational astronomy
• 18:2918:29, 8 November 2009 diff hist −243‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ saw it, thx.
• 15:3115:31, 8 November 2009 diff hist +181‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ another explanatory sentence.→‎Power and root
• 15:2615:26, 8 November 2009 diff hist −1‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ maybe not. Undid revision 324655952 by 71.182.244.158 (talk)
• 15:2515:25, 8 November 2009 diff hist +1‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ better place for logarithm example.
• 15:2415:24, 8 November 2009 diff hist +282‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ keeping the last (removed) example, avoiding the bright and unencylopedic style, as an illustration of the general flaw. →‎Power and root
• 15:2015:20, 8 November 2009 diff hist −677‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ example is substantially the same as the general principle stated in the analysis of the square root fallacies. →‎Proof that –2 = 2
• 15:1915:19, 8 November 2009 diff hist −26‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ more descriptive section title: Fourth roots →‎Proof that the square root of −1 = 1
• 15:1615:16, 8 November 2009 diff hist −390‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ Doesn't even seem to use cube roots, so is not substantively different from examples already given. →‎Cube roots Tag: section blanking
• 15:1015:10, 8 November 2009 diff hist +685‎ User talk:Paradoctor ‎ →‎Smile: new section
• 15:0915:09, 8 November 2009 diff hist +1‎ Agnostic theism ‎ close parenthetical comma
• 15:0915:09, 8 November 2009 diff hist 0‎ Agnostic theism ‎ perhaps, but not likely as a Proper Noun.
• 14:2014:20, 8 November 2009 diff hist −427‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ this example is already essentially covered in the "Power and root" section. →‎Proof to show any negative number is equal to its positive number Tag: section blanking
• 14:1414:14, 8 November 2009 diff hist −359‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ unified, and I think clearer, explanation is now given below. →‎Power and root
• 14:1114:11, 8 November 2009 diff hist −29‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ corrections →‎Power and root
• 14:0914:09, 8 November 2009 diff hist −11‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ got rid of silly "Q.E.D." →‎Power and root
• 14:0914:09, 8 November 2009 diff hist −478‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ reorganizing and giving explanations, with sources, that highlight the commonality of the examples. →‎Power and root
• 13:3113:31, 8 November 2009 diff hist +826‎ User talk:Point-set topologist ‎ reply →‎Regarding the revert
• 13:1613:16, 8 November 2009 diff hist +229‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ remark re page move. →‎Cleanup
• 13:1413:14, 8 November 2009 diff hist +234‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ ;-) →‎Cleanup