User contributions for 74.98.44.216
Appearance
For 74.98.44.216 talk block log logs global block log filter log
8 November 2009
- 03:2903:29, 8 November 2009 diff hist +35 Mathematical fallacy →Proof that 2 = 1
- 03:2803:28, 8 November 2009 diff hist −7 Mathematical fallacy →Proof that 2 = 1
- 03:2503:25, 8 November 2009 diff hist −5 User talk:Point-set topologist ce →Regarding the revert
- 03:2403:24, 8 November 2009 diff hist −2 Mathematical fallacy perhaps this will clarify things. →Proof that 2 = 1
- 03:1603:16, 8 November 2009 diff hist +410 User talk:Point-set topologist explanation of revert →Regarding the revert
- 03:1403:14, 8 November 2009 diff hist +346 Mathematical fallacy revert removal of properly sourced content. Undid revision 324574908 by Point-set topologist (talk)
- 02:0102:01, 8 November 2009 diff hist +236 Ham sandwich theorem state "ham and cheese" version in the lead.
7 November 2009
- 23:4123:41, 7 November 2009 diff hist −627 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics on second thouht, not really Undid revision 324541608 by 74.98.44.216 (talk)
- 23:0823:08, 7 November 2009 diff hist +627 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics actually, already covered. →Continued fractions
- 23:0423:04, 7 November 2009 diff hist −95 Nth root shortened continued fraction display →Computing principal roots
- 23:0223:02, 7 November 2009 diff hist −1,457 Nth root tightened recent addition. This is too detailed for the main article. Consider forking off to a different article. →Computing principal roots
- 22:5622:56, 7 November 2009 diff hist +441 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics move to a new article? →Continued fractions
- 21:5321:53, 7 November 2009 diff hist +78 Mathematical fallacy added diagram →Proof that any triangle is isosceles
- 21:2921:29, 7 November 2009 diff hist +5 Mathematical fallacy Ok. Barbeau does analyze a variant of this as we have done. Moved citation up to a better spot. Added {{cn}} tag to pushforward part. →Proof that 2 = 1
- 20:5920:59, 7 November 2009 diff hist +174 Mathematical fallacy added another citation, unforunately also without explicit analysis. →Proof that 2 = 1
- 17:3017:30, 7 November 2009 diff hist −12 Mathematical fallacy removed unnecessary bold
- 17:2917:29, 7 November 2009 diff hist +95 Howler *A kind of mathematical fallacy
- 17:1117:11, 7 November 2009 diff hist +8 Mathematical fallacy More authoritative reference. →Introduction
- 17:1017:10, 7 November 2009 diff hist +504 Mathematical fallacy howlers →Introduction
- 17:0217:02, 7 November 2009 diff hist +538 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics r →What to do with article invalid proof
- 16:5816:58, 7 November 2009 diff hist +216 Mathematical fallacy another reference →References
- 16:2316:23, 7 November 2009 diff hist +87 Mathematical fallacy outworn →Introduction
- 16:1816:18, 7 November 2009 diff hist −29 Mathematical fallacy complex numbers should not be mentioned, except in the resolution of the fallacy (which here seems unnecessary). →Version 3
- 16:1216:12, 7 November 2009 diff hist −7 Mathematical fallacy reordered examples. Gave a reference. Copyedits. →Power and root
- 16:0716:07, 7 November 2009 diff hist −617 Mathematical fallacy This fallacy is now already mentioned above, more tightly. →Proof that all numbers are equal Tag: section blanking
- 16:0716:07, 7 November 2009 diff hist +71 Mathematical fallacy further condensing. →Proof that 2 = 1
- 16:0516:05, 7 November 2009 diff hist −336 Mathematical fallacy condensed. This really is just a trivial variant of the above. No "correction" to the proof is implied. →Division by zero
- 15:5315:53, 7 November 2009 diff hist +606 Mathematical fallacy Started to write an introduction
- 15:3515:35, 7 November 2009 diff hist +777 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics r →What to do with article invalid proof
- 15:2515:25, 7 November 2009 diff hist +33 Mathematical fallacy fair warning →Proof that 1 = 0
- 15:2415:24, 7 November 2009 diff hist +34 Mathematical fallacy {{OR section}}: consider this fair warning (if the year-old "unreferenced" tag wasn't enough). →Proof that 1 = 0
- 15:2215:22, 7 November 2009 diff hist +407 Mathematical fallacy added a paragraph as a preliminary attempt to summarize the contents of the article.
- 15:1415:14, 7 November 2009 diff hist +32 Mathematical fallacy +
- 15:1315:13, 7 November 2009 diff hist +219 Mathematical fallacy Reference for Pseudaria.
- 14:5714:57, 7 November 2009 diff hist +553 Mathematical fallacy rewrote lead from sources
- 14:4314:43, 7 November 2009 diff hist +2 Mathematical fallacy fmt →References
- 14:4314:43, 7 November 2009 diff hist +168 Mathematical fallacy Another general reference on the subject of the article. →References
- 14:3614:36, 7 November 2009 diff hist +1,029 Talk:Mathematical fallacy reply →Error in Proof that 2 =1 in section Calculus
- 14:2914:29, 7 November 2009 diff hist +2 Mathematical fallacy corrected →Proof that 2 = 1
- 14:2114:21, 7 November 2009 diff hist +521 Christoffel symbols proper definition
- 14:1514:15, 7 November 2009 diff hist +137 Christoffel symbols mention Riemann curvature tensor as an example
- 14:1314:13, 7 November 2009 diff hist +909 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics →What to do with article invalid proof: new section
- 14:0814:08, 7 November 2009 diff hist +368 Talk:Mathematical fallacy r →Explanation of revert
- 14:0414:04, 7 November 2009 diff hist +25 Talk:Mathematical fallacy refactoring. PST does not address the "cleanup" issue, but rather attempts to justify the revert.→Proposed cleanup
- 14:0214:02, 7 November 2009 diff hist +687 Talk:Mathematical fallacy r →Proposed cleanup
- 13:5613:56, 7 November 2009 diff hist +106 Christoffel symbols corrections, cleanup. →Definition
- 13:5113:51, 7 November 2009 diff hist −317 Christoffel symbols Removed editorialization.
- 13:5013:50, 7 November 2009 diff hist −1 Christoffel symbols often -> also
- 13:5013:50, 7 November 2009 diff hist −392 Christoffel symbols corrected and tightened lead. (They don't "measure curvature" as the old version stated, etc.)
- 13:4013:40, 7 November 2009 diff hist +59 Christoffel symbols seems important to point out that it does not behave tensorially under general coordinate transformations.