Talk:Ahmad ibn Rustah

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV (Talk) 05:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something is wrong with the dates here:

Ibn Rustah was a tenth century Arab chronicler
Of ancient Croatia he wrote in the chronical "Al-Djarmi"(842-47)

I guess either he or the author of the article had access to aqua vitae :-) Mikkalai 02:12, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC) Mikkalai 02:12, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

-Okay, sorry didn't notice, I just deleted the date since that seems the weakest link. sunja 09:29, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Deleting the word viking, from the sentence "He also gives an account of a Viking funeral at Birka." since he didnt do that at all, the word viking is not mentioned, and Birka was a town under the protection of the swedish king, therefore protected against, vikings. It was no "viking-town".

Total nonsense. Birka was certainly a 'viking-town' to the extent that any town could be a 'viking town'. It was a town from which many of the vikings originated. However, the term 'viking' is not the correct term to use for people living in Scandinavia during the viking age, since it was not what they called themselves. 'Viking' is a romanticist term. See the viking article. .. Anyway, to return to the topic here: ~~I remember reading about Rustah's funeral choronicle in Alf Henriksson's book of Swedish history and it does not say it was in Birka, which it certainly would have if it were so.~~ It seems pretty far fetched - Rustah could've witnessed viking funerals all up and down the Volga and Dnjepr during his lifetime, there was no reason for him to travel as far as scandinavia to see one. --BluePlatypus 23:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Checked the Henriksson book, he was referring to ibn Fadlan's chronicle. But the point still stands, I can't find a reference saying ibn Rustah actually visted Birka. Anyone? --BluePlatypus 02:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

rv copyvio

reverted text copied from http://www.iranica.com/articles/v8/v8f1/v8f1076.html dab (ᛏ) 17:44, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Not Arab

He was Persian not Arab. Please fix. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.82.48.54 (talk • contribs).

um, we had "Persian" since December 2004. what's the problem? dab (ᛏ) 16:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?

Does anyone else think that the two quotes about the Rus are contradictory? I mean, in the first, they are portrayed as stereotypical raiders and slave traders, hence, non-settled peoples (The island is described as covered in forest, yet in the second quote, Rustah says the Rus' have many towns and are very clean).

It seems more to me as if he is describing two different types of peoples, not the same Rus'.Yarilo2 19:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great Moravia

The passage attributed to ancient Croatia is in fact about Great Moravia. The 'sacred king' is Svatopluk, whose name means sacred king (or ruler, roughly). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.115.176.88 (talk) 07:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ahmad ibn Rustah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927040857/http://www.arabcin.net/areen/areen_english/29/prespectives.htm to http://www.arabcin.net/areen/areen_english/29/prespectives.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attitude towards foreigners

The article says Ibn Rustah wrote that the Rus we very friendly towards foreigners and ones seeking refuge. I'd love to think my ancestorrs were nice guys, but is this actually true? Ibn Rustah was a powerful man and not anyone "seeking refuge", so would he even know? 77.241.136.32 (talk) 19:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]