Talk:Ctesiphon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ctesiphon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq Mid‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Top‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Syriac Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Assyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

Ancient??

====

Ancient?

Really? From Wiki - "Ancient History covers all continents inhabited by humans in the 3,000 BC – 500 AD period."

Even 500 AD is pushing it IMO - but 630 AD is certainly not 'Ancient'

Robfwoods (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sack

The general that sacked ctesiphon in 164 AD was Avidius Cassius not Avitus....two different romans living centuries apart

Julian the Apostate also attacked Ctesiphon in 363 but was repelled. He did win the initial battle, though, so he'd probably deserve a mention (Julian died in a battle during the retreat from Ctesiphon)

removed a shout-out tag. --xiaou

Salman Pak same as Madain?

In some sources Salman Pak is said to be a different name for the city of Madain/Ctesiphon, while in other sources it says that Salman Pak is a village neighboring Madain. Does anyone have a definite answer? Pats243 01:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is a definite yes. The tomb of Salman the Persian--the first Persian to become a Muslim and chosen as one of the 'Companions' of the Prophet Muhammad is only a short walk away from the great arch.

Salman arrived in Ctesiphon with the invading Muslim army. It was probably due to his influence and earlier correspondence with the authorities in the city that Ctesiphon opened its gates to the Muslims and surrendered without much of a fight. Salman was thus appointed by the Caliph Umar as the first Muslim mayor of the city, where he lived and served until his death. Today, his tomb is a sacred place and is visited by the Shia and the Sunni Muslims alike. He is also considered to be the patron saint of the barbers (whence the Persian colloquial term for a barber shop: "salmani.") Every year local people bring their newborn boys for their first haircut to the tomb of Salman. It is a festive occasion and everybody enjoy themselves with food, drinks and music.

M. Izady

The present day city of Salman Pak is on the east bank of the Tigris River (the map on the Page puts ancient Ctesiphon on the West side of the river). The City of Madain is a little bit further east of the river. Both Cities are currently hot-beds of sectarian killing between Sunni and Shia. The irony is, thousands of years later, there is still a heavy Persian/Iranian influence in this area. I would like to make a trip to the ruins of Ctesiphon before I leave Iraq but no one else is keen to make a road trip.....IEDs.

-From Baghdad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.255.36.116 (talk) 19:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Alexander of Macedon's invasion

--213.141.159.52 15:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ctesiphon was just a village at the time of Alexander. It is only after his death that one of his general, Seulucus builds a town in there and names it after himself, Seulucia on the Tigris.

Map

The map seems to show Ctesiphon on the left bank of the Euphrates, which is wrong. It should be on the left bank of the Tigris. 86.149.8.107 15:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seperate article for Al-Mada'in?

I expanded / created the article on Al-Mada'in, because I think it's worth distinguishing them - Al-Mada'in is the broader metropolis / urban area, whereas Ctesiphon was one of the cities in it, so Al-Madain would be Ctesiphon and it's suburbs, or Seleucia and it's suburbs, etc. (depending of the period we're talking about).

What would you think about moving (or copying?) some of the material from the Ctesiphon article to Al-Mada'in? flammif e r^talk 17:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New article for Taq-i Kisra

... because I think it deserves an article of it's own. (plus hey, you can see it on Google earth!); I moved a couple paragraphs from the "Palaces of Ctesiphon" section here to over there. They didn't really fit here, and I guess they were recently moved from a seperate article, right? Anyway, they were slightly redundant with the rest of the article (at least on the history and locations bit), so i also reintegrated a bit into the main article. flammif e r^talk 08:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palace photo date

Is there any way of verifiying the date of 1864 assigned to the first photograph of the palace ruins? I ask because I happened to be looking at Hugh Kennedy's The Early Arab Conquests, which contains the same photo but dates it to 1912. Given that parts of the palace apparently collapsed in the 1880s, this is of some significance.

Zburh (talk) 21:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup lead

The lead section needs some cleanup, perhaps an infobox, and removal of images. Viriditas (talk) 11:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Destruction of Books

How could the books be thrown to the Euphrates, when Ctesiphon is at the side of the Tigris? I've corrected it. If someone has a reason to revert it, please clarify said reason here.

Can someone please provide any credible citation for this claim. i Have never heard of "Library of Ctesiphon" being burned/destroyed by the Arabs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhad.tajik (talk • contribs) 04:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ctesiphon. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 11:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

I know that the Latin and Greek pronunciations of Ctesiphon are straightforward, but is there any consensus on its pronunciation in English? When I first heard the name in a Roman history course taught by a Latin professor, he said it as "stɛsəfan". Going by the Greek, though, it seems that "stisəfan" would also be likely. What about historians in the UK or elsewhere in the English-speaking world? Tsunomaru (talk) 23:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno about a consensus. I just removed this—/ˈtɛsɪfɒn/—from the lead sentence. Unlike Polybius, this is something where we should have a pronunciation guide but we need to have reliable sources for it, not just people's best guesses. We also need some explanation on what that κかっぱ was doing there in the first place if the original name was just T~ and Greek has a perfectly good Τたう sitting around to start its words with. —

Llywelyn II

06:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ctesiphon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090116013710/http://www.iranica.com/newsite/articles/v6f4/v6f4a030.html to http://www.iranica.com/newsite/articles/v6f4/v6f4a030.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greeks in the city of ctesiphon?

What are the sources for the Greeks in Ctesiphon? As far as I know, the Greeks were not in persia at the end of the Sasanian era. In general, Greek and Roman identities were considered as enemy and opposite — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassanid.soldier (talk • contribs) 18:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of Greeks/Romans were deported to the western cities of Sasanian Iran, including Ctesiphon. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend

you are right

But these Greek and Roman captives were solved in the local and native identities of the Sassanian Empire. To the extent that in the sixth and early seventh centuries there was no trace of the existence of the Greek people in the ::city of Ctesiphon, the capital of the Sasanians?

However, I am also waiting for historical sources to prove the existence of Greek people in the sixth and early seventh centuries in Ctesiphon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassanid.soldier (talk • contribs) 20:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any historical sources yourself that the prove "Greek and Roman captives were solved in the local and native identities of the Sassanian Empire" :p? --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No information regarding population numbers?

I'd at least like to see rough estimates on how many people lived in ctesiphon at its height, aswell as various other points in the citys history. --77.222.163.183 (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tisfun in English sources

Many sources in English also use "Tisfun". See examples in Google Books search. So I think the alternative name "Tisfun" can be used in the lede. Khestwol (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many vague and seemingly non-RS sources yes. No major scholar uses the word "Tisfun" to refer to the city, whether it be Bosworth, Daryaee, Frye, Yarshater, Boyce, Rezakhani, Potts, Payne, etc. The name is simply not relevant enough to be in the lead. HistoryofIran (talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Lotus Derafsh Kaviani.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]