Talk:Equus Survival Trust

A fact from Equus Survival Trust appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 978 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Equus Survival Trust is the only conservation organization in the world that specializes in equines?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/February.

Wikipedia

Talk about use and linking of "endangered"

The term "endangered breed" is used through the conservation breeders community, as evidenced by the multiple sources used to source this article. While at the moment, the word "endangered" redirects to the endangered species article, and clearly a breed is not a species, the word "endangered" can have more meanings - endangered breed, endangered health, endangered habitat, yada, yada, yada. Thus, the solution is not to remove the word "endangered," but perhaps instead to fix the dab and the redirect so they are more appropriate to the word used. Having now taken this issue to talk, I invite the other editor to discuss, without insults and to AGF. Montanabw^(talk) 15:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are wrong, incorrect and lazy. You shouldn't be like them. Further reversals of my edits will be taken as vandalism. Abductive (reasoning) 15:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not threaten me, I have done a compromise edit that incorporates both phrases. You will do far better to provide reasoned arguments. The term "endangered breed" is used extensively, and no one is arguing that a breed is a species. Other than the redirect going to the endangered species article, I see no logic for your (redundant) "wrong, incorrect" and "lazy." See, e.g. these: [1], (mission statement) and and a formal definition from the European Environment Agency So, I question your "incorrect" assertion. Please provide better reasoning for your actions other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Montanabw^(talk) 21:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equus Survival Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081028161619/http://akhaltekesocietyofamerica.com:80/index_Page409.htm to http://akhaltekesocietyofamerica.com/index_Page409.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]