Talk:Hulusi

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Musical Instruments Start‑class Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italics

Why are we using italics for the name hulusi? I think we should remove them, as it's the name of the instrument. No need to foreignize it.--Sonjaaa 15:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign words that have not become part of English are italicized. Badagnani 17:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I tihnk it's become English. Any musicologist who talks about it would use the word "halusi". It's not an everyday word in English, but it's the only English word we have for it and all English-speakig people would use it if they had to talk about it, no?

The rule usually is that if a word appears in normal English dictionaries it's become part of English. Some foreign instruments that might be found in English dictionaries would be "sitar," "djembe," "shakuhachi," or "taiko," as they're widely played in English-speaking countries. But hulusi is not widely known in English-speaking countries and has definitely not become an English word. Even the dizi isn't well known in North America outside Chinese music circles, and the bawu is probably better known than the hulusi. Badagnani 04:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hulusi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220171628/http://www.melodyofchina.com/06instruments/hulusi.html to http://www.melodyofchina.com/06instruments/hulusi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]