Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New List[edit]

... should be writen down, with sections.

--Polysynaptic (talk) 02:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Farabi not Turk[edit]

Oxford professor C.E. Bosworth notes that "great figures [such] as al-Farabi, al-Biruni, and ibn Sina have been attached by over enthusiastic Turkish scholars to their race"

He didn't write in Turk, didn't mention Turk, and Ibn Sina repeatedly insulted the Turks, given that Farabi influenced him greatly. Why do Turks attach themselves to historical figures that have no relation to them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditc (talk • contribs) 18:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant lists[edit]

We already have a List of Turkish philosophers. I would suggest that any philosophers here be reflected there, and the title to this list be changed to either reflect (only) scientists (as in the current title) or scholars (as in the body).--Epeefleche (talk) 01:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]