Talk:Papa John's

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Papa John's article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Foodservice

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United States: Kentucky / Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as High-importance).

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Scalhotrod, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 26 December 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Headquarters, 2002 Papa John's Blvd. Louisville, KY 40299 - Map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Louisville, Kentucky may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

On 23 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Papa Johns. The result of the discussion was not moved.

The following link is unable to be shown in the See also section

List of pizza varieties by country — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.16.249 (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3rd largest Pizza chain?

Both this article and Little Cesars say that they are the 3rd largest pizza chain in the US. Something isn't right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:4200:8e20:e860:9ba7:1a66:ef0a (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article's assertion is unsourced; the little caesars one has a source, which supports their claim - looks like pizza hut is number four. Much as it pains me to give a damn, I'll make the change... Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 20:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 numbers has them at #4th. Here's an MSN "FoodNews" article. https://www.msn.com/en-us/foodanddrink/foodnews/the-top-10-pizza-chains-in-america/ar-BBKhlbg. P37307 (talk) 23:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: move to Papa John's. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🇺🇦 (talk) 08:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Papa John's Pizza → Papa Johns – New common name Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The new corporate branding does not have the apostrophe and the accepted common name has long been Papa Johns (previously Papa John's) anyway--Lahti213 (talk) 15:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Skeptical~~ (replaced with "Oppose" below): The lack of an apostrophe may match the latest corporate marketing initiative, but where is the evidence that this is the WP:common name used by independent reliable sources? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Taking a step back, as it’s commonly used (which is mostly be in conversation) I don’t think people distinguish much between no apostrophe and apostrophe. They use and hear the pronunciation. Given that, should we at least get the spelling (or punctuation?) right here? Also I noticed it was widely covered back in November (you can source many outlets online if you want). I thought it was quirky because I never realized there was an apostrophe before Lahti213 (talk) 03:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:TM, if a company does something unusual that does not fit the ordinary way of writing things in English, we follow ordinary English unless the other styling is consistently followed in independent reliable sources. If the usage is mixed, we follow ordinary English. In this case the inclusion of an apostrophe is a very common form for the name of a restaurant or other establishment established by a particular (fictional or real) person. If a woman named Alice creates a restaurant, it would conventionally be called "Alice's Restaurant", not "Alices Restaurant" (which is a red link, because that's not what people would write as the name of the restaurant). The only way it might end up being called "Alices Restaurant" might be if it was some sort of grammatical trick to indicate that the restaurant involved more than one Alice. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 10:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per MOS:TM: The Google Ngram viewer shows that the apostrophe is usually included. As outlined above, that is the form that most closely resembles ordinary English formatting for a pizza shop founded by someone named Papa John. This is a posessive expression, not a plural. Moreover, their own website's title bar shows up as "Papa John's Pizza Delivery & Carryout – Best Deals on Pizza, Sides & More" and there are many other instances of "Papa John's Pizza" right on the front page of the company's own website, and the name of the company, "Papa John's International, Inc.", includes the apostrophe. In fact it looks like the company always includes the apostrophe when it refers to itself, except in its logo. I see "Papa John's Gift Cards" and "Join the Papa John's Team" and a footer that lists "Papa John's Pizza Stores in The United States", and "Papa John's Pizza Stores in Canada". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 11:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, good points. Briefly, it’s not John’s restaurant, and since November reliable sources use no apostrophe (vs. the website/corporate gift cards/picture…but if those are also seen as relevant then it’s more because the company is still working through the change…the prominent pics have no apostrophe). Important we get this right!--Lahti213 (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It may not actually be John's restaurant anymore, but that is the way such establishments are typically referred to in English even when the original operators are no longer associated with the business. Indeed, an auto shop called "Mike's Auto Repair" may never have been owned by someone named Mike, but that is OK. The idea that the company is just too incompetent to remove apostrophes and the word "Pizza" from its own main website page is sad. Unless we determine that the less natural name is being used consistently in independent reliable sources (not just some sources, but the vast majority of them), we should leave this the way it is. An announcement of a rebranding campaign is not enough. Wikipedia is not an extension of corporate marketing, and in this case even the corporation is still using the current name and punctuation. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support The name change was only a couple months ago and it will take a while for RS to catch up, but much like, say, Bojangles (restaurant) or Tim Hortons, the current apostrophe-less version is correct. 162 etc. (talk) 16:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia follows the sources, we don't lead. If the company's own website hasn't "caught up", then it's too soon to move the article. Rreagan007 (talk) 01:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. Their own website still has references to "Papa John's Pizza" and "Papa John's International". Rreagan007 (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Corporate website lists everything with an apostrophe, website browser title (what appears as the name in the tab) also retains the apostrophe.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Papa John's. Keep the apostrophe, but this is its clear common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Papa John's.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Papa John's per others. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Papa John's with the apostrophe. The company's own marketing still uses both, and everyone else spells it with the apostrophe. User:力ちから (powera, πぱい, νにゅー) 23:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to nitpick, this is definitely an exaggeration. For example, searching "Papa Johns" on Google News finds 6 pages of results (i.e. ~60 articles) from the last week (here's the first story that comes up, as an example). But the spelling with the apostrophe is more common in RS, and has WP:TITLETM on its side. Colin M (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Headquarters is listed wrong

One part of this article says Papa John's HQ is (a) near Atlanta; another part says it's (b) near Louisville; another part says it's (c) both. What's true? a? b? c? Or is it (d) something else? It would be nice for the article to be correct and to agree with itself. TooManyFingers (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This source [1] cited in the article states that Papa Johns has headquarters in both Atlanta and Louisville. 162 etc. (talk) 05:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, other sources say something different, or the conflicting information wouldn't be here. That's the point. TooManyFingers (talk) 06:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the article to clarify the two HQ situation. 162 etc. (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Papa John's → Papa Johns – Papa Johns updated their brand name to exclude the apostrophe, citing https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/marketing/papa-johns-ditches-apostrophe. This change should be implemented to follow the new brand name as of last year. Andrewwintl (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose. This is just repeating the proposal of six months ago (closed 1 March 2022), and the provided rationale has absolutely no relationship to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Wikipedia is under no obligation to follow the lead of corporate advertising campaigns. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per previous RM. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 23 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Papa John's → Papa Johns – Has been the trade name of the company for a number of years now. I am aware of the previous requested moves of this nature, but I believe it should now be changed. Google Trends shows that "Papa Johns" has a far higher interest over time for the past year than "Papa John's". Strugglehouse (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Ngram shows continued usage primarily with the apostrophe. We shouldn't keep needing to have this discussion over and over. The Ngram viewer seems to use higher quality sourcing than Google Trends. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BarrelProof Ngram shows use in printed sources, Google Trends shows online sources/popularity of Google searches. I'd say online sources should take priority. Strugglehouse (talk) 09:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Slight oppose, per BarrelProof, although the Google trends make a viable case. n-grams now go to 2022? When did that happen, they were good through 2019 last time I paid much attention to the years. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per previous RMs. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.