Talk:Presidency of Richard Nixon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Presidency of Richard Nixon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1095 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Presidency of Richard Nixon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1095 days |
Text and/or other creative content from Richard Nixon was copied or moved into Presidency of Richard Nixon with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 October 2014. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Worst President in History
[edit]What is the dispute here? Whoever undid my edit did not give any reason. What was deleted was the sentence in the opening paragraph: "Nearly all historians now agree Nixon was the worst president in US history." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.11.80.156 (talk) 03:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Unless you can provide many, many sources from reputed historians calling him the "most terrible president" directly, it would be 1)Unsourced and 2)Unencyclopaedic language.I was not the person who undid your edit, but the revert seems correct.Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 16:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Can't we find someone (anyone!) other than Jonathan Aitken to provide a positive quote about Nixon?
[edit]The section Presidency of Richard Nixon#Historical reputation presents a somewhat negative quote from a historian (Stephen E. Ambrose) about Nixon, followed by a more positive one from Jonathan Aitken. It's possible that from a US/global perspective, Aitken is just known as a biographer of Nixon, but from a UK perspective he is remembered for a range of other things, including the abrupt termination of his prominent political career when he was jailed for perjury and perverting the course of justice. In 2021 I added a few words [1] which I thought added some context to him being the source of a positive view of Nixon, but these were swiftly reverted for WP:SYNTH. While I understand and (grudgingly) accept the reversion, I still feel that it is ironic, to say the least, for a positive quote about a disgraced politician to be sourced (without comment) from another disgraced politician. I accept that it is reasonable for the article to include something to contrast with the Ambrose quote, and wouldn't go as far as to say that we shouldn't quote Aitken, but rather that it would be preferable to use someone else who doesn't themselves have such a chequered history regarding the truth. (At the risk of committing another WP:SYNTH, I might also direct anyone interested in Mr Aitken's reliability as a biographer to the section in his Wikipedia article that deals with his more recent biography of the ex-President of Khazakstan: Jonathan Aitken#Nazarbayev and the Making of Kazakhstan: From Communism to Capitalism) JA 1961 (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
I believe I’ve asked this question before but I don’t recall the response. Why is there no article on the resignation of Richard Nixon, and only a four paragraph summary and a redirect? Viriditas (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve been asking this since 2011, when I created the redirect. Viriditas (talk) 00:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- How is it that the only US President to resign doesn’t have an article on the topic? This is incredibly unusual. Viriditas (talk) 00:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Still makes no sense the more I think about it. Pardon of Richard Nixon gets its own article, but not the resignation? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Viriditas (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- How is it that the only US President to resign doesn’t have an article on the topic? This is incredibly unusual. Viriditas (talk) 00:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- B-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Mid-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- B-Class United States Presidents articles
- High-importance United States Presidents articles
- WikiProject United States Presidents articles
- B-Class United States Government articles
- Mid-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- B-Class United States History articles
- High-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- B-Class American politics articles
- High-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles