Talk:Red Hebe
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Red Hebe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 20:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Vickers Red Hebe air-to-air missile was dismissed by the British Air Ministry's own Operational Requirements branch as "still in the piston era" compared to the US Sparrow? Source: Twigge 1993, p. 208.
- Reviewed: Lucia Votano
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 21:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC).
all checks out, new enough, long enough, hook is certainly interesting, QPQ is sound, no obvious copyvio, I can't see a problem here. Good to go. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles