(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Viatkogorgon - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Viatkogorgon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleViatkogorgon is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 9, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2021Good article nomineeListed
November 12, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Updating some details ?

[edit]

Hello everyone, on the occasion of the publication of the brand new study published by Kammerer and Rubigde in 2022, I would like to point out that it would be nice to add the most recent proposed cladogram for the gorgonopsians, which also mentions Viatkogorgon. This cladogram is also available on the main article, but also on Phorcys dubei, Nochnitsa, Inostrancevia and Sauroctonus (Which are the two articles in which I participate the most in their expansion). Cordially, Amirani1746 (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you link or spell out the study? FunkMonk (talk) 01:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@FunkMonk I already added some days ago now. Amirani1746 (talk) 07:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A possible third specimen?

[edit]

In the article, there are only two specimens mentioned. However, there is a website (which mention sources) which indicate that there would also be a third specimen of Viatkogorgon. The link in question is as follows: [1]. So for now, I would like to know for sure if the claims are real. Amirani1746 (talk) 07:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would depend on what their source is, the website itself doesn't seem too reliable in itself. It's a shame nothing else has been published about the supposed larger specimens, not even images. FunkMonk (talk) 08:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FunkMonk To tell the truth, the site mentions several fossils, but as I do not see any linked sources, it is possible that these fossils have not yet been mentioned in the scientific literature. Amirani1746 (talk) 11:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]