Talk:Wapato Bridge

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

old bridge removed.. when?

I didn't have any trouble finding sources for when the new bridge opened (June 23 2008), but I couldn't find anything to indicate when the old bridge was removed. Certainly it is gone now (June 2009), that's all I know. Additionally, this incident might be worth noting.

In fact, we might want to split this into two articles, or at least two infoboxes- one about each bridge. tedder (talk) 07:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This I think should be good enough. I don't think we would need two articles, or even two infoboxes. The infoboxes would overlap in most of the fields, so I would suggest moving the dimension info from the infobox that pertain to the old bridge into the Old bridge section. Then have the new bridge info in the infobox. Then maybe change the section order and move the New bridge section up so the image of the twin bridges would be in the Old bridge section so the text would be supported by the image. And lastly, the lede needs to be updated. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, integrated info from that URL, updated the lede. I didn't change the section order- since it's currently in chronological order. I'm done for now. tedder (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sauvie Island Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070509072852/http://www.commissionersam.com:80/sam_adams/2006/03/input_wanted_sa.html to http://www.commissionersam.com/sam_adams/2006/03/input_wanted_sa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]