Template talk:Peer review tools

change to use WP:refill

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

seeing as WP:checklinks, WP:reflinks, etc, are going to be subsciption access only, starting tommorow, I propose that at least the reflinks like be replaced with WP:refill, which is a free, open-source alternative. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 04:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Cabayi (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

oh... wait, what? that was a joke? huh. okay. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 22 March 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove the line {{pp-template|small=yes}} since protection templates are handled automatically by the documentation page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do these still work?

I got 404 errors when I tried using them from this page; are they all dead? {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 16 November 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change

Manual of style

to

Manual of Style

to match the capitalization used by the Manual of Style itself. 123957a (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Terasail ^[✉️] 05:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]