Template talk:Taxonomy/Stegocephali

Template:Taxonomy/Stegocephali is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Template-protected edit request on 28 February 2023

This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Stegocephalia has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change link from Stegocephalia to Stegocephali as that is the article name Lavalizard101 (talk) 23:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the article, Stegocephali, the first sentence tells us, "Stegocephali (often spelled Stegocephalia) is a group..." So in this case it would seem that either spelling is okay and correct. Otherwise, this taxonomy page would have to be renamed to Template:Taxonomy/Stegocephali. Is that what you want? If so, then it would require the building of consensus in a well-watched venue such as the taxonomy talk page, WT:TOL. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 06:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as that is the correct original name for the group thus has priority over the alternate spelling (per ICZN principal of priority). Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The principle of priority doesn't apply to names for ranks above the family group. Plantdrew (talk) 16:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reread article 23 on the iczn website (https://code.iczn.org/validity-of-names-and-nomenclatural-acts/article-23-principle-of-priority/?frame=1), and you are correct, I must've misread it the first time. Although I feel that we should at least pipe the link to prevent a circular redirect on the Stegocephali article. Lavalizard101 (talk) 21:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Lavalizard101: there is no need to change from the redirect – per the WP:NOTBROKEN editing guideline. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 21:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Lavalizard101: was able to make the small change so that the self-link in the taxobox in the Stegocephali article has been changed to a bold non-link. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 18:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]