User talk:320L

Welcome!

Hello, 320L, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page 43 (number) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Dhrm77 (talk) 11:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

I replied on my page: ": First it is not removed. I just moved it in the proper place. And I added a tag, because every addition needs to be sourced. see . Now, you might want to reach out to some Christian publication and have your findings published. Then it can be included in Wikipedia." Dhrm77 (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

By the way, don't forget that every page is constantly monitored by many editors, some editors would not have been so kind, and reverted your entry without an explanation. Also, don't feel bad, my first contribution to Wikipedia was also reverted, but after 17 years on WP, I have learned what I can or cannot do, and most of my edits stand. And that doesn't mean I became a stickler for rules. I don't necessarily agree with all of the WP rulebook, but they are here for a reason. Dhrm77 (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I understand now. I responded too quickly, sorry for that.

In the meantime I searched for a reference and have added it. It's not a well founded source, but it is the only source that I can find.

Thank you for feedbacking. 320L (talk) 11:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Typically blogs aren't considered reliable source. On one hand there isn't too many available sources. On the other hand, you and I also independently verified it. Dhrm77 (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)