User talk:BLKTMPLR

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ang Probinsyano has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ang Probinsyano was changed by BLKTMPLR (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877647 on 2017-02-16T07:09:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philippine Drug War. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Philippine Drug War was changed by BLKTMPLR (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884739 on 2017-02-16T07:31:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello BLKTMPLR, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Hacienda Luisita have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your addition to Brad Pitt has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Clark International Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shabu

Ninoy Aquino International Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Congo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clark International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shabu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your addition to Tacloban has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Trinidad, Bohol. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BLKTMPLR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deeply apologize for the inconvenience and trouble that I have caused regarding editing and adding information in pages, because of the lack knowledge that I have regarding this situation I was rash with my work. I have fully read and understood the guidelines in copyright policy. I will assure you that this type of mistakes won't happen in the future and I also promise to follow the guidelines and rules and to be more careful and mindful regarding editing and adding information.

Decline reason:

This has been an ongoing problem for some time. I am utterly not convinced you understand how to not violate Wikipedia's policies on copyright and what is and isn't permitted. Please read through the numerous relevant linked materials on this page and restate what they mean in your own words. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BLKTMPLR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Based on my own understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policy, before the contributor adds materials or new information in pages, the contributor/editor needs permission/authorization regarding the materials they will use and it is important to keep in mind that it also must be compatible with Wikipedia's licensing terms. Moreover, the materials or information to be placed on the pages must cite the original reference to avoid plagiarism. Lastly, the editor must be mindful when writing information that was based on a reference to avoid close paraphrasing that could lead to copyright violation.

Accept reason:

I have unblocked your account, as you now seem to have a good understanding of how copyright applies to Wikipedia and you've made a commitment not to violate our copyright rules any more. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure you are understanding our copyright policy. Please answer the following questions (you don't have to post a new unblock request to do this; simply post your answers below):

When is it okay to copy from your source and when is it not okay? How can you tell the difference?
If you've copied directly from your (compatibly licensed) source, how would you indicate that you copied the material rather than wrote it yourself?
What is plagiarism?
What is copyright violation? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answers:

Based on "Contributors rights and obligations" the contributor/editor can import or use materials if it's falls into the the public domain under fair use or if the under terms are compatible with the CC BY-CA license. Moreover, it is not okay for the contributor to use materials that violates the copyright of others or the author, for the reason that it may cause legal liability.
I will provide credit to the author/authors and cite the reference's that I have used in making the contribution.
Plagiarism is taking or copying someones ideas/writing without giving acknowledgement and credit to the author/owner
copyright violation is putting or uploading copyrighted materials without authorization/permission from the original author.

These are solid answers, and you've made a commitment to improve, so I have unblocked your account. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]