User talk:Bgsvpv

November 2019[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. N.J.A. | talk 11:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bgsvpv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

new on wikipedia, I did not follow enough the guidelines and I believe our article was too much advertising

Decline reason:

You haven't done any of the things the block message requests, so there are no grounds to consider lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 12:31, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bgsvpv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have unfortunately been falsely flagged as spam. I do not wish to disrupt or make any malicious contribution to wikipedia. I have since read the guidelines to not write in an "advertising" fashion, give as many links as possible to external sources and write as much as possible in an encyclopedic fashion. I wish to create the page for www.game-seer.com , our investment fund. Wikipedia is very relevant to us to let people know what we did in the past and we are doing know. I would like to get help for my contributions to be reviewed before they are public. As paid contributor (Since I am writing about our own company - I will also disclose it as soon as I am unbanned. Thank you for your help

Decline reason:

Wikipedia has zero interest in helping you tell the world about your investment fund and what it does or allowing you to otherwise violate WP:PROMO. There are places where you can do that; this is not one of them. If you want to be an individual, general Wikipedia contributor, please agree to not edit about your fund or anything related to your conflict of interest, and tell what topics you will edit about instead. As you have not done these things with your request, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No. As we've previously said, we won't unblock you to do that. Nor will we unblock you unless you pick an appropriate username. Please read all of the policies and guidelines we've linked you to. --Yamla (talk) 13:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested for a user name change. I will make contributions to be reviewed following the guidelines for redaction, I am also disclosing that I am a paid contributor as requested - what else can I do?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgsvpv (talk • contribs)

What else can you do? Tell us what you'll edit, now that you know you won't be unblocked to write about gameseer or anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. And please, one open unblock request at a time. You have two. --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]