Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! LizRead!Talk!19:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Bouzinac,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! LizRead!Talk!19:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding San José Airport, Las Perlas to the List of airports in Panama.
You have also added Punta Patiño Airport to the list. Do you have any coordinates or reference sources for that airport? All I've found was a seasonal mention on the Air Panama destinations page, nothing on any of the standard airport reference lists.Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 22:36, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air France destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Queenstown - that is - I am convinced that there are people who think Tasmania is a separate nation from Australia, and that New Zealand is a state of Australia - but then there are some of us down here think that some things in the northern hemisphere are quite surreal JarrahTree12:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bouzinac. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hey, just had contact with SAS because the site not showing the flights to FAE. They have fixed it now, so SAS does fly to FAE. On the site of SAS you can find them under Faroe Islands or FAE! CineCreator (talk) 17:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Bouzinac, thanks for starting this article. I cam across it when reviewing new pages, but I couldn't tick it off yet to be indexed by Google because it has so many empty section and no references. If you weren't already planning to do so, could you add your source and any more info you have? If you ping me when it's done, I'll review it straightaway. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anne Boleyn , yes this small airport has one route [1], two names (Pagar Alam -- Atung Bungsu), and one IATA code PXA [2] + is referenced by indonesian airports autorities [3]
Thanks, if you add the references to the article and some more info I'll review it, but at the moment I'll leave it until it's further on, before we release it to be indexed on search engines. Boleyn (talk) 08:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bouzinac. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Maimana Airport. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bouzinac. Thanks for finding duplicate articles on airports. I swapped the redirects for Bella Vista and Villa Vista airports because the Villa Vista article is better referenced and there was an error in runway length. The usual sources are equally split on the airport name, but the Villa Vista article lists both.
All the new airport stubs that I created were from redlinks in wiki airport lists. Apparently some wiki airport lists have name changes or spelling errors, so if you find any more that I've made duplicate pages on, please let me know. Again, thanks for your work, Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Marambio airport) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for your new article on Marambio airport. Since the article is rather short, it might be a good idea to actually merge this topic to the "Airport" section of the Marambio Base article, though experts on Argentine operations can make that decision. Good luck!
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Hello, Bouzinac. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi Bouzinac. With sincere apologies, I'll be swapping your redirect on Simisini Air Base and Simi-Simi Airport. Simisimi was a typo in an FAA Notam. The redirect dropped three external links and a template. I'll move the history text to the air base page and add some links, so we won't lose anything. Again, sorry for the hassle. Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 00:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Your discussion that occurred more than 30 months ago is the only "obscure" discussion here, taking place at the talk page of a child page of a WikiProject, and not the talk page of the WikiProject itself. You knew you could not obtain consensus for the inclusion of IATA/ICAO codes on destination lists then, so why get into a huff to waste others' time constantly reverting over the issue now? CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@CaradhrasAiguo: I see that you are really engaged into a war with the air dest lists, as if you were personnally concerned... And this show there was no consensus on deleting ICAO/IATA codes on these lists, because many people wished to keep this info. Cheers. --Bouzinac (talk) 08:42, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NOTVOTE, and the fact that you have not re-engaged in discussion at the WikiProject shows the only one who is interested in "warring" is you and the IP from Seoul/Gyeonggi. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The link you provided for the chart you added just goes to some coding gibberish on wikidata, how can I or the reader see the reliable source that these figures came from? MilborneOne (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I've upgraded the query so that you can read which provided the figure for the said year
I asked the question at Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources about how the reader knows it is a reliable source. Where does it say in plain English where the source of the data was? Just to note I dont have a problem with the table itself I just want to know where the figures came from, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 09:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, please note that excessive statistics are not allowed in airport articles (see WP:AIRPORTS-CONTENT), so please do not add further large graphs as they will be removed again. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.116.57 (talk) 08:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, please note your statistics charts are no longer usable seemingly due do a change in the website. The charts do no longer load and display a broken link symbol. Please update or remove them accordingly. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.121.130 (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bouzina, these statistics no no longer work since late June now (see the above messages), and create empty sections, broken image symbols, ... Keeping them in articles becauyse one day they might work again is not a good solution. Fram (talk) 13:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. It keeps empty sections yes but I don't see any error or broken link with the template "Airport-Statistics". The original template "Graph:lines" has trouble since few months [this one is indeed producing a broken image]. Wikimedia is working on a new tool linking graphs to Wikidata so when it will be online, it will be shown on these page. I don't want to redo the work of reputting template on thousands of airport pages. --Bouzinac (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not removing it on French Wikipedia (or any wikipedia version but enwiki), nor have I plans to do so. I don't understand your second sentence, how does that demo page help me with my cleaning work? Fram (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When you copy information from another article, your edit summary must show that you have copied the information. If it does not, it appears that you created the content when in fact it was created by others. You have violated copyright.
You completely removed all information about this siege from the parent article, leaving a gaping hole. You should have left a summary in the parent so it would give a coherent narrative, with a {{main}} pointer to the new sub-page for those readers who want more detail.
You did not copy over the cited sources, so the references were dead links
You did not add any new content.
There is nothing wrong with making a new sub-article on Siege of Tyre (1124), but it should avoid the problems listed above. That is,
Write the new sub-article, preferably with more information than is in the parent article,
Give credit in the edit summary when you copy anything from other articles, e.g. Content copied from [[Venetian Crusade]],
Add a {{main}} pointer in the parent to the new sub-article, leaving the content or a summary of the content in the main article.
I would be glad to answer any questions you may have about this. Wikipedia has a lot of rules and it takes time to get used to them. Again, making a new sub-article is fine, but doing it by unattributed cut-and-paste is not. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 00:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts. We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate.
Currently there are two active communities:
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Apologies - my mistake Pmbma (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC). Note to anyone reading this - Bouzinac was doing unrelated edits and was essentially an unrelated passer-by while an edit war was taking place[reply]
Austin Bergstrom Airport change of URL in infobox (Reference#2)
Nothing worth as a stand-alone article. Neither does it quote any references. If reference are provided it can be merged with List of airports in Nepal
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please be more careful and invest a bit more time when adding the statistics bar template. You destroyed the carefully maintained image layout of several articles by placing the template infront of the images/files placed in several statistics sections. You have to place it *after* the file links to maintain the layout. Otherwise the images float nonsensically in the middle of the section and other people have to clean up after you. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:1095:7801:1188:2E36:DE27:21AB (talk) 08:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"All years have been sourced on WD. Is it that hard for you to check it?"
Thank you for highlighting one of the reasons why using WD on enwiki is such a nuisance. Things change on Wikidata without any indication in the history of the page on enwiki, but directly influencing our article. This time, it may have been positive. Next time, it may be vandalism or an error. Who knows? For the sake of whatever, one now needs to look at and edit two sites to get the same result, which is a lot less obvious to edit for most editors. Fram (talk) 09:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm sorry to have been rude with you but WD is a data backbone for all wikilanguages. If you edit the sources and data at (Q1431012#P3872) ,it would be immediately visible at, for instance, it:Aeroporto_di_Charleroi-Bruxelles_Sud#Dati_di_traffico. New data for, say 2021, can be batched and all wikiarticles would be updated, helping people see the raw table being no longer up-to-date, while seeing new years in chart and not in table [Note that I'm strongly supporting both raw tables and automatic charts]. You can see the italian wikipage isn't uptodate since years, and the automatic chart could help italian editor improve the page.
WD does have a watchlist. But I agree WD has its drawbacks, being perhaps cryptic time to time for newbies but with explanations, it can be very helpful, and you can easily state sources + tell whether that data is good or not, and why. In the CRL case, there is for instance a bad 2020 number, per the airport stat page, but a good 2020 number per the national Belgian statistics office. Let me say advantages are more for WD than drawbacks. So if a 2021 data is typed on WD, would mean one time-work. And I just noticed the CRL traffic raw table is not uptodate.--Bouzinac (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And if someone vandalizes (or makes an error), it directly gets transferred to all languages as well... For me, the advantages don't outweigh the many problems. I hope these WD stats get removed from all enwiki pages, but until then, could you possibly try to get the actual name of the airport in the graph heading, and not the IATA code? Thatcode may be official, but is unclear or meaningless for most readers (well, LAX or JFK may be wellknown, but CRL not so much). Fram (talk) 09:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are admins and watchers at WD, I do not worry about vandalism in WD, well watched at. But errors can happen, indeed. May I highlight you that the raw data on enwiki is false with many errors for certain years that people did not spot? --Bouzinac (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And oh, thank you, I just discovered that you can watch WD modification on your enwiki/langwiki watchlist with that parameter
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on T Line (Sound Transit). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the busiest airports in Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Maimana Airport. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Template:Q number has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
