User talk:Cirt/Archive 16
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
In the Shadow of the Moons
Hi Cirt. Are you going to add some information to In the Shadow of the Moons so that it is distinct from Nan Sook Hong? No rush. Thanks. Borock (talk) 14:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. I will be adding some information. I will be adding lots of sourced information from WP:RS and WP:V secondary sources. Thank you for saying, "No rush", I appreciate that. Especially in light of some family health issues. :( -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that. I hope that everyone will be well. Borock (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello Cirt. I was not aware that Delhi Belgian Club was nominated for deletion and I feel that I can improve the article to make its notability more clear. The club is part of the history of Belgian immigrants in South-Central Ontario and is visited many times per year by tours[1] from Belgium. There are only five [2] Belgian clubs in English speaking provinces of Canada and this one is known as "the largest Belgian club in North America" [3]. Over 60,000[4] Flemish families settled in the area which was the primary settlement location of Flemish in the world as of 1970 (The Belgians in Ontario: a history, p.249). Could you please give me a chance to improve the article by un-deleting it or restoring the latest version to my user space? Thanks, Mmn100 (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- I will make a userfied version available. -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/42px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
List
Hi! I saw you were involved with a previous nomination for deletion of List of suicides in fiction, and felt you should be informed of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of suicides in fiction (3rd nomination). Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- On a totally unrelated note, I feel like we got off on the wrong foot. Now that everything seems to have calmed down, I'd like to apologize for any behavior you may have objected to, and I hope we can work together productively in the future.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I feel the same way. Let us both try to move forwards. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Great. May I ask, out of curiosity, for the rationale of your comment at the AfD? It seems to be a well written support for the creation of an article on Suicide in Fiction, but I'm not sure if it applies to the list. You don't have to answer that if you don't want, I just was interested in how you felt and wanted your opinion out of the muddle of that page.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is a great rationale for the existence of both pages. In fact, they would both then academically complement the other. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, ok. I don't necessarily agree with that logic, but thank you.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is a great rationale for the existence of both pages. In fact, they would both then academically complement the other. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Great. May I ask, out of curiosity, for the rationale of your comment at the AfD? It seems to be a well written support for the creation of an article on Suicide in Fiction, but I'm not sure if it applies to the list. You don't have to answer that if you don't want, I just was interested in how you felt and wanted your opinion out of the muddle of that page.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I feel the same way. Let us both try to move forwards. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- On a totally unrelated note, I feel like we got off on the wrong foot. Now that everything seems to have calmed down, I'd like to apologize for any behavior you may have objected to, and I hope we can work together productively in the future.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
deletion of Kite Flying Society page
Hello Cirt -
I noticed you deleted our Kite Flying Society (band) page. I am wondering what we should go about doing to satisfy wikipedia admins as to the validity of our page. We have been featured on the CBS program "How I Met Your Mother"; we were on national top 10 album lists in 2006 and 2010; we have extensive press from a variety of media (in our home city of San Diego and elsewhere). I see any number of bands on wikipedia (including some from San Diego) who are not even active but are allowed to keep their page. We, KFS, have experienced far greater success, exposure and attention than these bands and yet our page was deleted. Did we not document our sources well enough? What would you suggest? We are still actively making music and are more than a simple fly-by-night garage band. Since our page's deletion, we have been featured on two more critics' Top Albums of 2010 award, which shows relevance and lasting power. We're currently recording our third album as well.
Thank you for your help and advice, Dustin Illingworth / Kite Flying Society dustin.illignworth@gmail.com
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.17.146 (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest you create an account. Then, you could work on a proposed draft version, in a subpage of your userspace pages. -- Cirt (talk) 03:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for The Best American Magazine Writing 2007
![]() | On 4 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Best American Magazine Writing 2007, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the American Society of Magazine Editors book The Best American Magazine Writing 2007 features investigative journalism about the Beslan school hostage crisis and survivors of Agent Orange? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I just now noticed that you blocked Missiondolores (talk · contribs) in September 2010.[5] Considering the incredible work this user has performed, not only releasing their text for use on Mission Dolores mural (since rewritten), but also donating three rare images,[6][7][8] I am honestly at a complete loss as to understanding why they were blocked. Could you look into this for me? Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I just contacted the user. He's going to post an unblock soon. He was not sure how to do it, so I'm trying to help him. Viriditas (talk) 07:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Done, unblocked. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will attempt to mentor the user as needed. Viriditas (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will attempt to mentor the user as needed. Viriditas (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Today's New Yorker Article
The Apostate: Paul Haggis vs. the Church of Scientology by Lawrence Wright February 14, 2011 I assume you already saw this already but just in case you missed it. I myself have not had time to read it all but the parts I did read seem very useful. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. There are parts that are quite informative, indeed. And others that are a bit creepy. -- Cirt (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Just finished reading it, I have to disagree its disturbing. CoS, is really being pushed to the tipping point. A well respected NRM scholar (you can guess who, we talked about him recently) mentioned at AAR that the shift from "Cult labeling," and "brainwashing" to the more incendiary abuse (Miscavige alleged abuse, Mcpherson) has been a important rhetorical shift. He also commented that since The St. Peterburg Times report and the project Chanology protests are pushing leadership to its most precarious state since LRH passed. I am interested to see what reaction the Church gives... if any. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that will be interesting, especially in light of the prior history of Operation Snow White. -- Cirt (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Just finished reading it, I have to disagree its disturbing. CoS, is really being pushed to the tipping point. A well respected NRM scholar (you can guess who, we talked about him recently) mentioned at AAR that the shift from "Cult labeling," and "brainwashing" to the more incendiary abuse (Miscavige alleged abuse, Mcpherson) has been a important rhetorical shift. He also commented that since The St. Peterburg Times report and the project Chanology protests are pushing leadership to its most precarious state since LRH passed. I am interested to see what reaction the Church gives... if any. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
This looks like a slam dunk delete and I almost punched it yesterday but something smells about that AFD and I'm not quite sure what it is. The only thing that stands out is that many of the "delete" !votes were "follow the leader metoos".
I don't think it could have been closed any other way though. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- If it helps, almost all of the "per noms" were young accounts (although not necessarily created in the last fortnight) whose talk pages were full of behaviour warnings and other evidence of poor editing judgement. Some, but not all, were Serbian/Albanian POV warriors. However, White Writer and Gaius Claudius Nero (also "per noms") appear to have a long history of constructive, quality edits in this subject matter. So clearly "per nom" was an opinion capable of being held by experienced Wikipedians. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- I guess if you disregarded the "metoos" from the POV warriors a "no consensus" close is possible but the admin who did that would be taking his lumps at DRV. (ie people screaming "SUPERVOTE SUPERVOTE"). --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Good points, all. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Image
Hey, can you use your admin magic and see if you can find the last time File:Bert_and_Ernie_Married.jpg was nominated for deletion for derivative work? Thanks, CTJF83 12:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Alright. -- Cirt (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 26. -- Cirt (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, CTJF83 21:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, CTJF83 21:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 26. -- Cirt (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Please create
User Георги Тодоров hi please create page serb albanien war pls cirt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.141.207 (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Try posting to Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbia's talk page. -- Cirt (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Finder-Spyder
I'm not bothering with all the utterly overly complex wiki code - I'd just like to know why you deleted the Finder Spyder wiki page? Many thanks Carlosos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.143.28 (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finder-Spyder. -- Cirt (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cirt
Apparently your close of the Brian David Mitchell afd is being interpreted as a rationale to never merge any portion of the two articles, bypassing any examination of the pertinent guidelines (obviously in my opinion, of course!) In any case, could you chime in and help us thread through the apparently complicated procedural issues involved? The current discussion on this matter is taking place here. If this would be possible, we will be sincerely appreciative. Thanks!--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I will defer to community consensus there. I would encourage you to try WP:RFC at the article talk page. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Helena von Schantz
I wish to appeal your decision to delete Helena von Schantz. Essentially there was no discussion and the criteria for deletion appears to have been as a politician not as a liberal feminist writer on gender and the law and education. I don't think that was fair and not helpful to trying to provide some space for Swedish gender politics here. I would be happy to discuss this further, but currently she is 'notable' for having taken the leader of the women's caucus of the Liberal Party to task over her position on morality and the law. Michael Goodyear (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but discussion was open for a good deal of time at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helena von Schantz. I would be most willing to make a userfied copy available in your userspace as a subpage for you to work on as a proposed draft version. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the offer - I accept. Maybe I am not understanding the process - yes the discussion was open - I said my bit - there was no response by Friday - on Saturday 2 people said not notable - I returned on Monday, and the article was gone. I hardly call that discussion. As I said above the original notice of intended deletion was based on that of a politician, which is not fair. Now if I undersatand your offer above, I can continue to work on the article and if I think there is substantially more information, I can re-create it? (so far I have been successful in all justifications for new pages) Thanks. Michael Goodyear (talk) 18:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Bulbous Cell Media Group - deleted page
Dear Cirt, I am contacting you regarding this post: 06:24, 9 February 2011 Cirt (talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Bulbous Cell Media Group" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbous Cell Media Group) I had actually added 2 valuable sources under the references section this morning. I'd appreciate if you could please kindly let me know why the page has been deleted and if the references were not sufficient? I have actually found more articles about Bulbous Cell on the internet today that I could also add. Please note that I am not trying to promote this company - I only did research on media agencies here in Tokyo, and was surprised that this company (where a friend of mine used to work for) did not appear on Wikipedia. Thank you in advance for your help.--Eaninat (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Suggest you could work on a proposed draft version, within a subpage of your userspace, to see if the subject fails or satisfies WP:NOTE. I could make such a copy available, at your request. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you advise me when would be possible to take the noticeboards off, please? ({notability|date=January 2011} {refimproveBLP|date=January 2011} {coi|date=January 2011}) --Artvoyt (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Suggest you inquire about this at WP:BLPN. -- Cirt (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for The Mystery of a Hansom Cab
![]() | On 10 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Mystery of a Hansom Cab, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1887, The Mystery of a Hansom Cab by Fergus Hume outsold Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes novel A Study in Scarlet worldwide? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
rʨanaɢ (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 06:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
AFD issues
On 28 January, you deleted Jean-Patrick Constantini per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Patrick Constantini. However, in the time between the beginning of the deletion discussion and the closure, the article was moved to Jean-Patrick Costantini (note alternate spelling). This article is still available (complete with AFD notice). Can you complete the AFD by deleting this moved article? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, will get on that, thanks. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Re Mitchell afd and now soon-to-be ani
I'm at a loss with regard to what venue to take my frustration over at the Brian David Mitchell talkpage to so I've decided to try----wp:ani? (BTW I will admit I was disappointed with your closing rationale at the pertinent afd--not at all in anyway whatsoever with what I imagine was the rationale itself but rather with your explanation of the same, which seems to remain inscrutable either to me or to my disputant on the talkpage, since I interpret it as your not choosing to weigh in on the proposed merger while he interprets it as your having done so........!)--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's here.--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 16:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for the notice. -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Personal attacks, threats and interference
Once again, The Transhumanist (talk · contribs) is interfering with the Contents test. I'm not going to waste my time here if such attempts at sabotage and intimidation continue.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RichardF#Please_be_on_the_lookout
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Contents_pages_(header_bar)&oldid=413200560
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Contents/TOC_navbar&oldid=413200380
What actions can be taken to stop this now? RichardF (talk) 03:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
RichardF (talk) 03:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm about ready to move on. If the bullies get their way, then so be it. RichardF (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Ashley Boettcher
What is the last page you created this page. I wanted to create this page, so find out the last page that was on Ashley Boettcher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrennanTorres1998 (talk • contribs) 07:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Not sure exactly what you mean. -- Cirt (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Portal promotions
Thanks - and done. And I've removed lots of unnecessary "noinclude" tags from the page, so it looks a bit less complicated now. So, we're back up to 150 now, but for how long, given the current state of WP:FPOR? BencherliteTalk 07:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps by then, others will be promoted as well. :) -- Cirt (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Spongecell
Hi Cirt,
I'm writing you to be aware of why Spongecell was deleted from Wikipedia. I recently updated the company info and added a few links to some articles that Spongecell appeared in. It seems that it was deleted shortly after that. I'm hoping you could shed a little light on the situation. Spongecell has always been about honesty and I would like to continue that. The company is very reputable, is not spam and only has the best of intentions. So anything I can do to understand better, make any changes to get the page back up would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
Dansponge (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Suggest you could work on a proposed draft version, within a subpage of your userspace, to see if the subject fails or satisfies WP:NOTE. I could make such a copy available, at your request. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you do that Cirt?
Dansponge (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
You deleted this page but this player has competed in the main draw in one of the major professional tournaments (2010 BGL Luxembourg Open – Singles, so she satisfies the 3rd criteria of tennis players notability (Luxembourg tournament is a WTA Tour tournament)Vinz57 (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) It was deleted per a consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Putintseva. You would have to take your disagreement with its deletion to WP:DRV CTJF83 20:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- No. The instructions at DRV say: "Deletion Review is to be used where someone is unable to resolve the issue in discussion with the administrator (or other editor) in question. This should be attempted first – courteously invite the admin to take a second look." So Vinz57 was right to take it here first and regrettably we now have a DRV when one might not have been needed (for Cirt: here). --Mkativerata (talk) 12:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: I undid my prior AFD close. I restored the page. I relisted the AFD for another potential seven days of discussion. The AFD discussion is ongoing, again, here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Putintseva. This DRV can now be closed, with discussion arguing for notability or lack thereof, continuing at the AFD page. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- No. The instructions at DRV say: "Deletion Review is to be used where someone is unable to resolve the issue in discussion with the administrator (or other editor) in question. This should be attempted first – courteously invite the admin to take a second look." So Vinz57 was right to take it here first and regrettably we now have a DRV when one might not have been needed (for Cirt: here). --Mkativerata (talk) 12:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Your DYK nomination of Richard Smith (silent film director)
Hello! Your submission of Richard Smith (silent film director) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! KimChee (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
All good now. I did not think to do a search for "Dick"! KimChee (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Nonzero Records
Just trying to understand how you resolved to delete the article given that there was only one delete but there was also one keep. I was in the process of adding more independent verifiable references and would have appreciated more time to provide them. The AFD discussion had only ben listed for eight days and I would have thought that it should have been left open to allow more time for a true debate/discussion to occur. Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would be most willing to provide a userfied copy for you, if you wish to work on it in your userspace to further satisfy WP:NOTE, and then consult back with me before moving it back into mainspace. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- That would certainly assist as I have located multiple verifiable references for the label, which will easily satisfy the notability requirements - something that could have been achieved without the need to delete the article. You still haven't answered my question on how a debate could be closed with only two responses - surely it could have been kept open in order to get a better consensus of views. Dan arndt (talk) 01:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Have just finished a whole series of references for Nonzero Records and was about to re-instate the article back on the mainspace but thought it might be worthwhile for another set of eyes to have a look. Dan arndt (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Richard Smith (silent film director) Article
Cirt,
Article: Richard Smith (silent film director)
You are the first administrator on en.wikipedia.org to be appreciated for something I did which was so small on an article you started. The article name got me confused for a while and it wasn't until I finished and move onto another article, that I realised "silent film director" isn't like todays movies. Anything that I can help with for example feedback or tidy up an article that you don't have much time for, you can ask me on my talkpage. Just leave a short message and the article link. You can find me doing the WikiProject Military History or WikiProject Biography mainly but I do have others that I help clean up, assess or try and put on the talkpage things that would improve the article for someone who maybe interested in that article. Adamdaley (talk) 02:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Okay sounds great. Thanks again, -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
User:Yms375/Idol Family History and User talk:Yms375/Idol Family History were mentioned or alluded to by MER-C (talk · contribs), me, and DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (talk · contribs) as pages that should also be deleted. Would you delete them per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yms375/sandbox, or should I start a new MfD for them? Cunard (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Done, -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for deleting those pages and for your untiring work at MfD. Cunard (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, for the appreciation of my efforts! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for deleting those pages and for your untiring work at MfD. Cunard (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for T. Arthur Cottam
![]() | On 14 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article T. Arthur Cottam, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pornographic Apathetic by film director T. Arthur Cottam was featured at film festivals in South Korea and France, and at an art exhibit in Vienna? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thank you for your help Victuallers (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to work on a possible RfC/U
I am working on a potential RfC/U about User:Geo Swan. The draft is located at User:Fram/Sandbox. I have used a discussion where you were involved as part of the evidence, and would like to invite you to go over the draft RfC and add or correct whatever you feel is necessary. Obviously, if you feel that an RfC/U is not appropriate or not the best step to take, feel free to let me know as well. Fram (talk) 11:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- It looks very good so far. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
slander aloud?
Hi, There are a few people who I follow in the circles of leadership development, one of which is Arthur Carmazzi. I do understand that your editors find him distasteful and do not want him on Wikipedia, however, as I searched for his recent contributions, I saw the Wikipedia link was still up on Google. And when I went to the page it states how Mr Carmazzi is a "notorious spammer". I am not to judge whether he is or not, I am sure you have sophisticated technics to identify spammers, however the claim is the Mr. Carmazzi is doing this himself (would seem unlikely from an internationally know figure) using "sock IP address" apparently including my IP and my comments. So if they are wrong about me, they may be wrong about others too. In any case, I personally feel that it is unseemly, and certainly not in good faith, to have a page ranked #3 in Google that calls him a spammer. After all, we believe what we read in Wikipedia.
I have informed his office and I am sure they will be contacting someone. I just wanted to inform someone and your welcome comments was so pleasant, I thought you may be a neutral party that could observe the situation. I made 2 comments on that page, one was deleted and the other was ignored. 180.249.132.107 (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- That page was deleted already, after a deletion discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Carmazzi. -- Cirt (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Contents pages navigation proposal
Now that the two week trial period is completed, please respond to the proposal, Adding topical links to contents pages navigational headers and footers, as you see fit. Regards, RichardF (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
After some checking
I am still convinced that it was Sherurcij. See also this link [9] This old article of Sherurcij is also very similar to the new article that Papermoneyisjustpaper just created. I am quite sure that this has nothing directly to do with Geo Swan. IQinn (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with IQinn, Cirt. I have had long dealings with this contributor, and the method used to talk around the Request for Deletion was eerily similar. --Yachtsman1 (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
note - BLPN - New Village Leadership Academy
Hi, just a note to let you know, you have got a mention in this thread at the BLP noticeboard, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, for the notice. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 02:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
IP User 68.104.61.40
THANK YOU. JerseyGirlMedia (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Richard Smith (silent film director)
![]() | On 16 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Richard Smith (silent film director), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Richard Smith directed the Marx Brothers in their first film, Humor Risk? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Very informative Chart
You have created a very nice chart over at Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug, It makes clear a continued patter. I like this one too over at Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/COFS#Update: Additional confirmations in COFS checkuser case. I was wondering what you thought of this user Quantumsilverfish (talk · contribs) who is criticized the sourcing at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/L. Ron Hubbard/archive2? The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- User:I'm4aNPOV I am pretty sure its the first CoS account on Wiki The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Most interesting, thanks. -- Cirt (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Broken AFD request
I have no idea about all the AFD processes/templates, but I noticed that the malformed deletion request Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Diplomat is languishing at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2011_February_8 (where ordinarily it would have been closed yesterday). Can you fix it and relist it? Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted. -- Cirt (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Request for undeletion of my page
Good morning Cirt,
I would like to request undeletion for my page Binary University College of Management and Entrepreneurship. Kindly undelete and give me a maximum of 7 days to make the necessary ammendments as per the Wikipedia specifications.
Please let me know if this will be possible soon,
Kind Regards, Admin Binary University College — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valerie Pgs (talk • contribs) 03:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest you could work on a proposed draft version, within a subpage of your userspace. I could make such a copy available to you, if you wish it. -- Cirt (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Talkback notice
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Okay thanks for the notice. -- Cirt (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 15:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Okay, thanks for the notice, will check back there. -- Cirt (talk) 15:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Bacon WikiCup 2011 revisited
- Pages
- Wikipedia:Bacon WikiCup
- User:SuperHamster/Bacon Challenge 2011
- User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011
- User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011/Submissions
- History
- Ideas
- Films? — Bacon Grabbers, Canadian Bacon, Slaughterhouse (film) (aka Bacon Bits)
- Books? — search on authors from prior year, also: Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon by Craig Fass, Brian Turtle, and Mike Ginelli
- Drinks? — Bacon and Tomato Sandwich, Bacon Liquor & Tomato
- Quality upgrade? The Bacon Cookbook, The BLT Cookbook (peer review)
Other ideas for new articles? ... Hrm ... -- Cirt (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- You stole all of the good topics. D: That's why I haven't gotten to do any. SilverserenC 16:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Glad I could help out! I was tempted to send you a message a couple of weeks ago, but had an awful feeling it would be a bit too close to gloating... Anyway am quite chuffed I managed to overtake your rather good score and will be watching your next move carefully ;) WormTT 17:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Your block
Hey Cirt, just to let you know, 24.25.218.135 geolocates to California, not the place Stubes99 supposedly is. --Bsadowski1 06:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel Golden Raspberry Award winners
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/Info_talk.png/36px-Info_talk.png)
Category:Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel Golden Raspberry Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Yaksar (let's chat) 20:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Worst Screenplay Golden Raspberry Award winners
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/Info_talk.png/36px-Info_talk.png)
Category:Worst Screenplay Golden Raspberry Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Yaksar (let's chat) 20:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Truth According to Wikipedia GAR
Just stopping by to let you know RL has been significantly busier than expected yesterday and today, and then over the weekend I'm away from Wikipedia, but I haven't forgotten your GAR and I will be back to it on (Australian) Monday! - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 15:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi - My initial review of this article is complete. Please leave a message on my talk page when you are ready for me to revisit the review. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
I want to create a new article Giridharilal Kedia
I want to create a new biography of a well known respected person, Giridharilal Kedia, which you have deleted on 12 January 2010, 02:15. so please help me on creating this biography.
I hope you can understand my language. if there is be any wrong from my side then please forgive that.. thank you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odisha1 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Bacon Challenge 2011 coming to a close
Dear ever-so-valiant Bacon Challenge 2011 participant:
Almost a year ago, the Bacon Challenge 2011 kicked off for the third year in a row with the annual mission of expanding and bettering Wikipedia's coverage of bacon. We are almost at the end of this year's Bacon Challenge, which ends on March 1st. I am pleased to say that, during this time period, Bacon Challenge participants have done a great job. Ten new pages have been created. Two articles have been granted the status of being good articles. Over one hundred reliable sources have been placed into articles, and over 7,500 words have been added. Six articles have been featured on Wikipedia's main page under the "Did you know..." section. These are all excellent results.
The Bacon WikiCup has also been exciting to watch. Contributors have been racking up more and more points as the deadline approaches. As I post this message, Worm That Turned is in the lead, with
Cirt in second, and
Acather96 in third.
Cirt currently has created the most new pages, while
Worm That Turned has done the most work in expanding articles and achieving DYKs.
Acather96 has done the most work with image uploads. Remember, while the Bacon Challenge is ending in just a few days, it's not too late to make any last-minute contributions to get a few more Bacon WikiCup points. Everyone who contributes at least something will earn a virtual commemorative medal, so if you haven't contributed anything bacon-related to Wikipedia, now's your chance. Contributions can be submitted up until the end of March 7th, but only for contributions that were done before the beginning of March. The extra week is provided for participants to report any last-minute contributions, and to allow for any contributions that require a timely process (such as a good article or DYK nomination) to go through. At the end of the event, scores for the Bacon WikiCup will be completed and re-checked, and prizes will be distributed. Thanks and good luck! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/70px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Signpost...
Been a while since I bothered you about that Dispatch on FPs. Had a little bit of a falling out with Wikipedia myself. Haven't written anything significant for the post in a while. Anyhow, I still think you should write it, especially considering the Dispatch hasn't had anything since November. ResMar 03:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics
- The Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I saw this page has been previously deleted, I was wondering if I could create the article?
Spick3 (talk) 23:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Cirt--I do not find the article entirely promotional. This is a famous foundation, and the article just needs some editing, to remove duplication with other articles and also a little material which follows their website too closely. I suggest you restore it, & I'll do the necessary. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) DGG ( talk ) 23:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would have to agree with DGG on this one. It doesn't look too spammy. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Cirt--I do not find the article entirely promotional. This is a famous foundation, and the article just needs some editing, to remove duplication with other articles and also a little material which follows their website too closely. I suggest you restore it, & I'll do the necessary. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) DGG ( talk ) 23:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Would I recreate the page and you edit it? Or would Cirt somehow reactivate the page and you edit it? Thanks! Spick3 (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Done, now at User:Spick3/The Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. You may work on it there, as a proposed draft version. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 02:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I made some edits, including removing all of the external links. What else should be done before it is made into a full article? Spick3 (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Rrburke (talk · contribs) may have some helpful suggestions. -- Cirt (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Will he? Good Lord, it's not like you're putting me on the spot or anything. :) -- Rrburke (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you please explain...
Could you please explain the history of this SPI? You are the first person to make an entry in this SPI, and you initially named me as the sockpuppet master. Geo Swan (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Linkin Park
Since you deleted the Wikiproject, could you please delete the related subpages for it as well? (Check my edit history, I tagged them all for G8.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Image
Can you give me your opinion on this? Is it worth requesting undelete? CTJF83 12:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
As you are a contributor to the Musicals articles, I would value your comments at Talk:Musical theatre, where an editor wishes to delete all of the ELs to the article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Deletion review for Giridharilal Kedia
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Giridharilal Kedia. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Odisha1 (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank You!
![]() |
The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar | |
I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition. It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will be presented with a mock up to assess on aesthetic appeal. Finally, I invite all of you to participate in the featured sounds process itself. Whether you're a performer, an uploader, or just come across a sound file you find top quality, and that meets the featured sound criteria, you can nominate it at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. Featured sounds is also looking for people to help assess candidates (also at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates.) Thanks again for such a strong showing of support, and I hope to see you at featured sounds in the future. |
- Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Ignoring your close
Hi Cirt, boldly following/ignoring your close on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/On_Verra, I redirected Ma Petite Lumiere to Jocelyne Labylle, as I think that is more usefull. If you disagree, feel free to delete, since that was your close. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Alright. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cirt! I note that you are returning the favour of my slow review by being slow to respond! The seven days on this GAR have run out today but I know that you had responded almost immediately to my initial comments so I'm assuming you would like me to hold the GA open rather than closing it. Could you let me know what's going on with this one? If you're busy at the moment one possibility is to close it as Fail, with an option to jump the queue on your next nomination of the article by coming straight to me. Or if you can start improvements now there'd be no problem with holding it open another week. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. It having been another three days with no response I am regretfully going to close this GA review as Fail. However if you decide to re-nominate when you return from your wikibreak I would be more than happy to help you jump the queue and, in essence, resume my original GAR. Just leave me a message on my talk page if you want to go down that route. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Seems to be mostly addressed now. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Spongecell
Hi Cirt,
I'm writing you in response to trying to get the Spongecell Wikipedia page back online. It looks like you made some changes, I just don't really know what my next steps for setting this up again is?
Thanks,
(69.193.172.234 (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC))
- I would suggest you create an account on Wikipedia, then you can work on a proposed draft version. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Victor Filotti
You have deleted the article Victor Filotti which I posted, on the basis of a very short discussion in which a single other wikipedian participated. I do not request the reinstatement of the article, but I would like to recover the information which I have posted. Is there any way in which this information can be recovered for my own use, or is it forever lost? Afil (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would be more than happy to make a version available to you within a subpage of your userspace, so you can work on a proposed draft version there, to see if it might fail or perhaps satisfy WP:NOTE. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Removing page BugNET and its recreation avoidance.
Hi Cirt,
You have removed a page titled BugNET from the Wikipedia and you marked it to not be recreated again. As I have used BugNET which is a Issue Tracking software and I know this is a noteable software comparing to other Issue Tracking Softwares mentioned in the wikipedia. I would like to ask you to revert its page back or let me to recreate its page. As Comparison_of_issue-tracking_systems is a good source between comparison of this kind of software, I wanted to have this software in this page.
If you want to read more about BugNET you can see its website at http://www.bugnetproject.com/
Thank you for your attention.
Ehsan — Preceding unsigned comment added by EBouhendi (talk • contribs) 10:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would be more than happy to make a version available to you within a subpage of your userspace, so you can work on a proposed draft version there, to see if it might fail or perhaps satisfy WP:NOTE. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Article deletion discussion
Hi. Can you voice your opinion on the Beth Sotelo deletion discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Curious why me in particular. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Missed one!
When you deleted Franjo Topic, you missed that someone had moved the article to Franjo Topić after the AfD was started (I think). End result is that the article still exists, but isn't a recreation, so G6 may not technically apply. Please delete. Thanks. The-Pope (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay will do. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Tarique Mustafa's Page Deletion
Hi Cirt,
I have a few questions about my page being deleted by you. According to you, my page has been deleted because Tarique Mustafa is not a notable person. However, this is what I have on my research about him. Tarique Mustafa is an important Computer Security Engineer that brought the Data Leak Prevention to the new generation. Because of that, he has received the award from Frost & Sullivan about Excellence in Technology Innovation Awards in 2009. Although I don't work for him, I still strongly believe that he is notable enough to meet all the notability standards of Wikipedia. I have edited my page and ready to send to you for rechecking before posting.
Thank you.
Here are some "reliable" sources:
- http://www.eetimes.com/design/other/4014346/Security-event-correlation-Raw-network-security-data-to-real-time-action
- http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/070108-nextier.html
- http://www.securitymattersmag.com/security-matters-magazine-article-detail.php?id=453
- http://www.solnet.com.pe/pdf/DLP-Russia2010_Mustafa.pdf
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Heomap1983 (talk • contribs) — Heomap1983 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- (talk page stalker)Does this look like we need a checkuser? --Orange Mike | Talk 22:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Could you please explain what you mean by checkuser?Vinh 23:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Following up the request at Help Desk,[10] I posted a WP:GNG review of the Tarique Mustafa topic on Heomap1983's talk page here. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Cirt, Here is the new article that I just created in my page User:Heomap1983/Tarique Mustafa. Would you please take a quick look and give me some feedback? because I need to recreate title name "Tarique Mustafa" that has been locked by you. Thank you
- In response to your questions/objections please be informed that the subject of this article (Tarique Mustafa) is a well known technologist in the data security space who has been awarded many Industrial Awards and multiple independent third parties have written about him and his groundbreaking contributions in the area of Data Security and Semantic Search resulting in Key Patents. I am including here several links about Independent Third Party Articles and References that have been cited to the subject's (Tarique Mustafa's) work in the Data Security and Semantic Search Field. Pleas do take time to properly review each of these (see included below) Third Party Articles and References regarding the subject of this article before you arbitrarily pass judgement on the "notability" of this person. AGAIN, here are the Third Party Articles and References for you attention:
“Everything You Know About Wireless Is Wrong: A treatise on the evolution of Mobile Computing Technology and Market”, In Proc. of UCLA Wireless Conference, 2001
Data Leak Prevention appliance
nexTier Demos Data Leakage Prevention at RSA
nexTier Intros Next-Gen Data-Leakage Prevention
Embedded.com Design Articles Vinh 23:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- With regards to User:Heomap1983/Tarique Mustafa, please read WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:CIT, and WP:Article development, on how to cite and properly format articles. -- Cirt (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hope all is well
I haven't seen you around for a while. Hope all is well. Best regards. - Hydroxonium (H3O+) 07:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Been thinking the same myself :) WormTT 07:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to see you back, will have to have a decent Bacon cup competition this year! WormTT 20:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, and perhaps... ;) -- Cirt (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Very, very happy to see you back. We missed you dearly. - Hydroxonium (H3O+) 18:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for the well wishes. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Very, very happy to see you back. We missed you dearly. - Hydroxonium (H3O+) 18:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, and perhaps... ;) -- Cirt (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to see you back, will have to have a decent Bacon cup competition this year! WormTT 20:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
article deletion
Hello. Please explain your deletion of this article: "Juan Castillo (filmmaker)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elba2323 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Castillo (filmmaker). -- Cirt (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Big thanks
For helping NY Detox through its GA review. Best wishes, MartinPoulter (talk) 16:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
House episodes
Since when is WP:ITSNOTABLE a valid argument? I see nothing that suggests every episode is notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Are there any episodes you have failed to find secondary source coverage for, in your research? -- Cirt (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, almost every freaking single one. Stuff like TV.com is not reliable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Most interesting that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House) seems to be trending towards WP:SNOW type Keep result. -- Cirt (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think it's getting snow-closed only because it's a bundle AFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Junko Sakurada
The article Junko Sakurada you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Junko Sakurada for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Image
Is it worth trying to request undeletion of File:Bert and Ernie Married.jpg as actually being free, or not? This also. CTJF83 19:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I just wanted your opinion.... CTJF83 19:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
AfD
I noticed you recently closed the AfD for Longfellows poetical works. But during the discussion, the article was moved to Longfellow's Poetical Works,[11] so that article should be deleted as well. TFD (talk) 20:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Done. -- Cirt (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. TFD (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Are you sure about this close? The only source claimed to be reliable was demonstrated in the discussion to be a self-published personal web site. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest waiting one week, and posting to those interested in improving the page and encouraging them to speedily do so. Then, I would strongly support your re-nominating the page to AFD again, for a fresh discussion. Feel free to keep me posted. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey Cirt--I understand the 2-2 vote (not counting mine) can be seen as "no consensus," but surely you agree that the sourcing for that article leaves a lot to be desired; it's basically nothing but a few websites. One 'keep' voter added references which aren't anywhere near WP:RS, and even PhilBridger stated he couldn't find anything. Moreover, among the lengthy comments of the other 'keep' voter, an SPA if ever there was one, is a remark that betrays a conflict of interest (never mind the basic lack of knowledge of our guidelines): "I have permission from Mario’s management to edit several independent web pages and part of a music website relevant to Mario's music." In my opinion, the complete lack of reliable sources on the internets (see [12], [13], and [14]) should also give cause for concern. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, only now I see Phil's message above. Thanks Phil. Drmies (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with your judgement to keep this article. If you check who voted on this AfD, you'll find two IPs from Austria, and two newly registered user. All four have only "contributed" to this AfD. To me, that looks an awful lot like WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT. --bender235 (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hrm, good point, I have re-nominated it now. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- And by the way, if you read the AfD, you'll notice I repeatedly asked for someone to name a reliable source for Raffetseder's notability. The best someone came up with was an interview Raffetseder gave a couple of months ago to a small Vienna community radio. That's ridiculous. Raffetseder is non-existant in the news. --bender235 (talk) 22:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Note to self - Free Speech, "The People's Darling Privilege"
Talk:Free Speech, "The People's Darling Privilege"/GA1. -- Cirt (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note:
Done. Yay! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Aaron Saxton GA nomation
Hello,
I have reviewed Aaron Saxton; the review can be found at Talk:Aaron Saxton/GA1. Based on the state of the article, I cannot promote it immediately. However, I feel the concerns can be addressed easily. Thus, I am putting the review on hold for seven days. The article will be reassessed against the criteria by March 12, 2011. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, will get to it soon, thanks. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
WP:MOSICON related Revert War
Thanks for the protection on Template:JewishPolishHistory. It looks like the revert war on Template:JewishPolishHistory is just a skirmish in a larger revert war that appears to be based on an over-application of the MOS Icon guidelines by Gnevin and counter-action by Fry1989. Would appreciate some Admin intervention with the two editors per WP:GETALIFE. Ajh1492 (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest WP:ANI, or WP:Dispute resolution. -- Cirt (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will. Ajh1492 (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, good luck, -- Cirt (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will. Ajh1492 (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Contents navigation
Hi, does anything ever come of this: "Adding topical links to contents pages navigational headers and footers"? Does someone "close" it or do we all just go on our merry ways? -- RichardF (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Recommend post to WP:AN about it. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK RichardF (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well, that looks like just another waste of time to me. -- RichardF (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- How so? -- Cirt (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- I posted like you suggested, no replies, no actions, no change, no resolution. -- RichardF (talk) 13:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hrm, you could try WP:ANI as well, I suppose. Or more serious forms of WP:Dispute resolution... -- Cirt (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- I posted like you suggested, no replies, no actions, no change, no resolution. -- RichardF (talk) 13:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- How so? -- Cirt (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well, that looks like just another waste of time to me. -- RichardF (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK RichardF (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Since you closed the debate, I thought I'd let you know that I went ahead and redirected "Morpheous" to Morpheus as per User:Reyk's suggestion. The alternate spelling appears to be in use, so a redirect seems appropriate. If this photographer becomes notable at a later date, the article can always be recreated as Morpheous (photographer). Cheers. freshacconci talktalk 22:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, sounds fine. -- Cirt (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Tarique Mustafa
There's a new submission for a page that you previously deleted-> Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tarique_Mustafa
Can you please take a look at it? I have also requested couple of other people to take a look at it. Meanwhile, I have marked it "Under Review". If you feel it should not be accepted, can you please reject the page or let me know and I will do it. Otherwise I will go ahead with the usual review process and give feedback to the author accordingly.
regards
--abhishek singh (talk) 19:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I am not seeing enough secondary source coverage in WP:RS/WP:V sources to satisfy WP:NOTE. -- Cirt (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Truth According To Wikipedia
Hi. I would be happy to reopen the GA on this now that you're back at the desk but unfortunately things are a little busy for me right now and I'm not sure I can give it the attention it deserves for a couple of days. If you can stand to wait a couple of days I'll be happy to do it (give me a talk page poke if necessary) but you're welcome to relist if you'd prefer. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cirt. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (4th nomination), your input is sought at Talk:List of YouTube personalities#RfC: The criteria for inclusion on List of YouTube personalities. There are disputes over who should be and who shouldn't be included in the list. Cunard (talk) 23:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Cirt, would you give a third opinion at User talk:Cunard#Talk:List of YouTube personalities#RFC: Ray William Johnson? I asked Casliber (talk · contribs) but he isn't interested. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you providing a third opinion and for helping resolve this minor dispute. Cunard (talk) 01:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. -- Cirt (talk) 01:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for troubling you so much, but it appears that the dispute is not resolved yet. Cirt, would you take another look at my talk page? Thanks! Cunard (talk) 01:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. -- Cirt (talk) 01:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Electronics and the environment
Can you userfy (over to here) what little content that was at Electronics and the environment? Ta. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, it looks like you forgot to close the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Green (lawyer) after deleting the article. I would do it but I participated. J04n(talk page) 10:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Question about RfA comment
I have noticed that you made the comment "Oppose, concerns about breadth and depth of experience." on my RfA. Are you referring to CSD experience, or to something else? --Slon02 (talk) 03:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleting of List of call centre companies in Pakistan
Dear Brother,
I highly appreciate your kind action on my article however would you be kindly enough to let me know why did you take this step to delete it brother i will certainly highly appreciate it ...!!
- Thanks for your precious time to read this message
Yours Truly,--Faizanalivarya (talk) 03:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Water Tribe AfD
Hi. You closed WP:Articles for deletion/Water Tribe, which covered Water Tribe and Air Nomads, as delete. Since their content had been merged to Universe of Avatar: The Last Airbender, would you mind restoring and moving them to Talk:Universe of Avatar: The Last Airbender/Water Tribe and Talk:Universe of Avatar: The Last Airbender/Air Nomads respectively, per WP:Merge and delete#Move to subpage of talk page? Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 05:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I'd just like to bring to your attention this AfD as you deleted the articles redirect counterpart 2011 Challenger of Dallas - Singles Qualifying, and thought you may be interested in weighing in on this AfD. Afro (Talk) 14:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Chesdovi and 1RR on Israel, Palestine and the United Nations
Hello Cirt -- I see that in January you blocked Chesdovi (talk · contribs) for >1RR. Perhaps I should go to a noticeboard instead, but: would you consider what appears to me as a >1RR by this editor today on Israel, Palestine and the United Nations? Two edits are clearly reverts (with an intervening one by User:Number 57): [15] and [16], restoring text, as seen in this earlier revision. My effort to bring this issue to the attention of the editor in question was rewarded with yet another edit on the article. If I need to take this to a noticeboard instead, please just say so -- I've not tried this approach before, going to an admin directly first. thank you, Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just to let you know I subsequently took this to ANI and was told (puzzlingly, in my view) that there was no violation of 1RR here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 04:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
You recently acted on my request to protect this article. The editor or editors that I referred to in my protection request have returned to the article to revert the sourced changes I made. I'd rather not take such a mundane matter to AN/I and I am not familiar with the activity at the Biography Project. Should I just move on? Is there another forum better suited or should I post at the Biography Project? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Tiderolls 01:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structured dialogic design
Dear Cirt, I have taken the initiative to begin an article in Wikipedia about the science of structured dialogic design. This is a relatively young and fast evolving science, but in my opinion very important. The European commission has included it in at least 10 large projects already in the last few years as a means of achieving consensus among diverse groups of people with conflicting interests and points of views. I probably don't understand yet the rules of Wikipedia, this is why I need some help. The article was up for discussion and a number of people objected to its deletion proposing specific arguments. On the contrary those proposing the deletion did not provide any specific argument. For example, the first editor who proposed deletion simply removed ALL references to the actual science calling it "copyrighted" material" and then made the argument that was was left behind was not important enough (and he was right, because he deleted the actual content).
Could you please help and advice how we can go about saving this contribution?
am a strong supporter of Wikipedia. One of the reasons is because the public can find also new concepts which one cannot find it regular encyclopedias. In 10 years from today I am sure this science might even be taught in schools. But for now, Wikipedia is the place for it.
What are our options? I appreciate your time. Futuristas (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structured dialogic design - if you wish to work on a proposed draft version within a subpage of your userspace, in order to attempt to see if it does not fail WP:NOTE, I could provide that to you. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
We would greatly appreciate that. Would you also be available to provide some feedback and help whether what we would be doing satisfactorily responds to the criticisms that led to its deletion? Futuristas (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Who is "we" ? -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
"we" is two more authors one in Europe and one in the US who have been editing the article and defended it when it was proposed for deletion. I plan to ask them to help in the edit since they have knowledge of the subject. Futuristas (talk) 11:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, okay, just wanted to make sure that the Futuristas (talk · contribs) account was not controlled by an organization. -- Cirt (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Of course not! So, will you place the article in my user space? Futuristas (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Dear Cirt, I am still awaiting your response (a) whether you can place back the article in my user space (b) whether you would be available/willing to provide feedback and help whether the revisions would satisfactorily respond to the criticisms that led to its deletion and (c ) to recover the discussions which took place in the articles discussion section and maybe copy it to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structured dialogic design
where some other comments have been placed. Otherwise Wikipedia is loosing the discussions that took place regarding this article.
Futuristas (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Brian Green (lawyer)
It looks like you deleted Brian Green (lawyer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) while its AFD remains open:
- 2011-02-26: Proposed for deletion
- 2011-03-05: Relisted for additional comment
- 2011-03-06: Article deleted
- As of 2011-03-09: AFD remains open.
TJRC (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Help re: template
Hi. You're good with templates, so I wondered if you can get this template to collapse?: {{Oz}}
For example, it is at the bottom of The Wizard of Oz (2011 musical) and takes up a huge amount of space. BTW, do we need all those darn templates? Thanks for any help! All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks to TJRC for fixing the template! I still wonder, Cirt, if there are too many tempates at the bottom of The Wizard of Oz (2011 musical)? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cirt. Could you ask you to please explain your closure for the Jasmine Revolution AFD? I ask because I just closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–2011 anti-government protests as delete, and King of Hearts closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010-2011 Worldwide protests as delete last week as well. NW (Talk) 17:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Cirt. I would appreciate if you could reply to this at your earliest convenience. Thanks, NW (Talk) 02:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of Brian Green (lawyer)
You forgot to close the AFD :)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
--Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion
Per these contributions, please respond at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 02:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Did You Know People Can Fly?
![]() | On 13 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Did You Know People Can Fly?, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Did You Know People Can Fly? is the first full-length album by Kaddisfly? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion review for Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Mobile browser strings
thank you for deleting this i came here via a link and instead didn't get what i was looking for you ass —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.45.41.225 (talk) 23:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
You are valuable to the project & I just wanted to say thanks
Hi Cirt. I don't want to pry, it's just that I noticed you've been taking some breaks recently. You see, you are one of the people here that I admire greatly and I learn by watching you work. I just wanted to say that you are extremely valuable to the project and to thank you for everything you have done. Thanks very much.
Just to clarify, your value lies in the fact that you know what's going on and you have a perspective of this project that's important. It's your opinion that I really value. I appreciate all the admin work you do as well as the work on articles, but what is most important is your comments on how Wikipedia is/should be running things. I just needed to let you know that your efforts are valued. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 05:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just saw this on my watchlist and thought I'd second the motion! Jusdafax 05:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Paul Carrigan GA
Hey Cirt! I've been reviewing your nomination of Paul Carrigan, and have some issues that you may like to address. Cheers, Brambleclawx 14:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- As an add-on, I have not listed the article. When you've taken care of the concerns I've raised in the review, feel free to nominate it again. I suspect you're on Wikibreak, vacation, or are busy in real-life at the moment... Brambleclawx 16:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Please reconsider
Hi, I am not perfect in Wikipedia, but wanted you to reconsider this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nyla_Hasan&action=edit&redlink=1
As time is going on more and more news agencies are reporting this and this is a very important part of history for Pakistan, as these rare women are coming out and representing the nation: Have a look at the recent article and please let me know your thoughts and if possible restore it according to what you think can be written. http://tribune.com.pk/story/132516/mrs-pakistan-world-forever-young/
Thanks --Sonisona 05:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonisona (talk • contribs)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
White Ring - Sources for WP:NM
Hi Cirt,
I am not an experienced editor, especially not for music. I have found several articles which discuss the band White Ring and an interview with one of the members about the music genre White House. One of the British National papers, The Guardian, has an article about another Witch House band which are on the same label and mentions the band in passing. Can you help me with the page?
Regards, lofaesofa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lofaesofa (talk • contribs) 22:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
GE peer review
Please consider participating in the Gospel of the Ebionites peer review to prepare the article for GAC. Thank you. Ovadyah (talk) 09:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion review for Water Tribe
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Water Tribe. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
I tried to contact you at User talk:Cirt/Archive 16#Water Tribe AfD, but you have been inactive. Flatscan (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
/* note - BLPN - Aaron Saxton* /
Hi, there is a thread here at the BLP noticeboard regarding your contributions to the Aaron Saxton BLP, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:2004 L. Ron Hubbard To the Stars.jpg
File:2004 L. Ron Hubbard To the Stars.jpg is currently orphaned, so I nominated it for deletion. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Article deleted
Dear Cirt, I believe you have deleted wrongfully the article Olavo de Carvalho. The person in question is a well-known journalist and politizai commentator In Brazil (as its article in ptwiki shows. Unfortunately, it has been the victim of a smear campaign (both there and here) of a radical leftist user who dislike him politically (the IPs and the "Cedric" account in the deletion discussion, a known sockpuppeteer who has been blocked in ptwiki after Meta confirmed his/her abuse). I would like to appeal this decision, how should I proceed? Regards, RafaAzevedo msg 22:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pardon my intrusion. Probably not by reposting; I've added a G4 WP:CSD tag. For what it's worth, I am the one who nominated the article for deletion, and my edit history should make quite plausible what is the truth: which is that I had no idea who Caravalho was until I stumbled on the page and was amazed by all the polemical back and forth (about which RafaAzevedo is quite correct), coupled with complete inattention to the fact that this article (and its Portuguese equivalent) had not managed to find any WP:RS adequate to support an article who seems to fail WP:AUTHOR. I just wanted to weigh in with a reminder that "radical leftists who dislike him" may exist, but that wasn't really the reason this deletion happened. Wareh (talk) 13:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The Maids of Honor wikipedia page
Cirt,
Can you please tell me why you deleted The Maids of Honor wikipedia page? This band is a legitimate entity that has released material, has a viable fan base and has had their music played in at least 6 major television programs. Members of their band include grammy nominated songwriter Greg Camp of Smash Mouth and television celebrity Lex van den Berghe of Survivor fame. Their inclusion in the wikipedia community makes complete sense. Please advise and explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zombiepalooza (talk • contribs) 03:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- See where multiple users agree is failed our Notability Criteria for bands at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Maids of Honor (band) The Resident Anthropologist (Talk / contribs) 23:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
abramis academic publishing - delete 1st February.
Dear Sirs,
I do not have an issue with our page being deleted if it does not conform to wikipedia content guidelines, however the statement below is pretty derogatory and not true. We do not charge a fee for the majority of work we publish through abramis and we are selective in what we publish. We publish academic journals for the University of Lincoln and the English Dept at the University of Leeds. We also featured in an article in the Times Higher Education magazine (2 December 2010) Feel the Rush, Professor Tim Luckhurst, University of Kent. This may not be sufficiently notable for the purposes of wikipedia, and I have no objection to this.
We are a small company with a business model that utilises on-demand publishing but 'fancy copy-shop' in my view is not a fair comment. We have had some issues with one of our theoretical physics authors but this is not a fair reflection of the catalogue. We have just published two separate physics works with authors from the University of Oxford. Again, the objection is not that you wish to delete our reference, it is the comment that is displayed at the foot of this message.
I use wikipedia every day and have nothing but respect for the work that you do, but it is a very challenging business environment out there and statements like this do us no favours.
Kind regards
Richard Franklin abramis academic
Delete According to their own website they specialize "in the innovative on-demand publishing model" which means they are nothing else than a fancy copy-shop that also may do a bit of promotion on the side. They print whatever you send them for a fee. This doesn't pass WP:CORP. Travelbird (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.14.6 (talk)
DYK
Cirt--I left you in the dust at Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs! Probably you haven't updated in a while; please do so, since I get disoriented if I don't see your taillights in the dark night of article creation. Drmies (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion Review for Lacunae Expanse
You deleted the page I created claiming the game has not been reviewed. Here are some reviews: http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2010/10/the-lacuna-expanse.html
http://www.perl.com/pub/2010/10/colonizing-the-lacuna-expanse-with-perl.html
http://web.appstorm.net/quick-look/quicklook-games/quick-look-the-lacuna-expanse/
http://www.brighthub.com/video-games/mmo/reviews/93296.aspx
I'm sure you can find more if you look. Qchristensen (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Bacon WikiCup 2011 Awards
![]() |
Bacon WikiCup 2011 - Participant Medal | |
Due to your work in expanding bacon-related content during the Bacon WikiCup 2011, you have been awarded the Bacon WikiCup 2011 Particpant Medal. You received a final score of 310, earning yourself second place. Congratulations, and thank you for your great work! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 09:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
Also...
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For scoring the most points in creating pages (80 points to be exact) in the Bacon WikiCup 2011. Congratulations! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 09:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
Ilya Lazarenko and the Church of Nav
Reviewing some material on Ariosophy last night, I noticed that the above named individual in Russia has created the above named church as a kind of Russian variation on the old Ariosophy. I found one article specifically about the church, and several others which dealt with Lazarenko himself. The Church is described in an article in the St. Petersburg Times as having been created as a political and paramilitary instrument. I'm going to search for some more sources over the next couple of days, but thought that you might be interested in the subject. John Carter (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Daily Palette
What do I have to do to get The Daily Palette page reinstated? Tbliss558 (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)tbliss558
creation of a new topic - Tagle family
hi Cirt,
Good Day. I would like to request the re-creation of the page of the Tagle family. I was not able to add important sources back then but i promise to add as much sources as i can. Please reconsider. Thank you Sebastian016 (talk) 10:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Recreation of Mani Nouri
Hi cirt, i wish to recreate the page of Mani Nouri. I read the discussion and i believe that i can make a new page with more sources and credibility. Thanks, please consider it. Appreciate it.--Irancinemairan (talk) 08:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Deleted article Murdo MacDonald-Bayne 22/4/11
I'm not familiar with wikipedia conventions so please forgive me for copying this from a deleted article talk page here: I use Wikipedia almost daily and am very grateful for it. I have only very rarely attempted to edit or contribute to Wikipedia, finding 'wikis' a little beyond my computer skills. (I regularly use Wordpress without difficulty and have used wikispaces). I am sitting here in London (that's in England you know) and was extremely disappointed to see that an article about MacDonald-Bayne had been deleted. I had come to Wikipedia hoping to learn something more about this (to judge by his writing) extraordinary man. I am sitting with a copy of MacDonald-Bayne's "I am the Life" in front of me (hence my interest), a 159 page small format paper-back first published by L.N. Fowler & Co. Ltd of 1201/3 High Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Essex (less than two miles from my birthplace in Seven Kings, Ilford, Essex) in September 1948 (when I was two years old!) and running to the Sixth Impression in 1979. I have had the book for years, don't know where I got it but it has a sticker on the back from L.N. Fowler price £2.50. I don't believe that all articles need to be exhaustively 'cited' or 'sourced'. If they were, you might as well buy Encyclopedia Britannica. (I wonder if that has an article about MacDonald-Bayne?) Is this an example of Americo-centric thinking? ('some obscure Scottish spiritualist' (he doesn't appear to have been a spiritualist and was Scots not Scottish) with no 'sources' - so let's bin it) or is it something more sinister? Has Wikipedia now been infiltrated by the fascist American churches (some of whom would certainly crucify a MacDonald-Bayne) or the CIA? (by 'fascist American churches' I mean those churches which are fascist - I'm right and you're wrong' - not all American churches). Might the article be restored so that we can read it and perhaps add, edit, comment or provide sources?? Thanks in anticipation (sorry your editor doesn't like my English spelling, English place names or complex sentence structure) Trevor J. Bending —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.171.47 (talk) 10:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I, Mikhailov Kusserow, hereby award Cirt with The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for outstanding achievement in countering vandalism. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
Undelete Chuck Allison
I disagree with your decision to delete Chuck Allison from WP. He is notable within the C++ community and has published tons. Please restore his page and stop making wikipedia worse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidrone (talk • contribs) 15:16, March 9, 2011
Request reinstatement for article deleted 9 OCT 2010- King Lizzard
Changed info, added relevance and 14 cites. If marked for re-deletion please give me a chance to correct. Thanks for your patience.
Biography
Lizzard was born and raised in Detroit, Michigan during the 1960s, but living most of his life in Los Angeles, California. He is the son of country singer, songwriter Johnny Colmus [1] who wrote songs for Loretta Lynn and Ernest Tubb[2]. In 1973 he moved to California where he earned an acting scholarship[3]. From 1979-1983 he played bass guitar for a band called Legacy, which opened for Cheap Trick, Chuck Berry and Molly Hatchet[4]. Lizzard cites Jimmy Page for his guitar playing style and obsession with the Les Paul Guitar. In 1997 he moved to Las Vegas where he performed and recorded with his father[5] and adopted the name King Lizzard. In 1997 he formed a techno rock band, Living Karma, with the late Misty Bennetts. From 1999-2002 he led King Lizzard's Hearts of Darkness Band. From 2001 to 2004 he hosted Inside Sin City and Sounds of Sin on LVRocks Radio [6]. In 2004 Lizzard played his last show with Pieter Holland and Les Warner of The Cult at the Beach Las Vegas[7][8]. In 2004 he became an ordained minister [9]. From 2003 to present he has been working for the 57th Wing at Nellis Air Force Base[10]. King Lizzard is married to photographer Queen Lizzard (Lana Colmus)[11]. He has four CDs available at iTune[12], Amazon [13] and other retailers.
Albums
- The Sin City Symphony (1998)
- The Patient in Room 666 (2003)
- ...and friends (2006)
- The Return of the Patient in Room 666 (2011)
References
- ^ "Johnny Colmus at Hillbilly Music".
- ^ "I'll Just Call Your Darlin' lyrics".
- ^ "King Lizzard on LastFM".
- ^ "King Lizzard at Music Connection".
- ^ "Official Johnny Colmus website".
- ^ "LVRocks Radio".
- ^ "LVRockers live at The Beach Las Vegas".
- ^ "The Beach Las Vegas".
- ^ "ULC Ministry List".
- ^ "Randall Colmus Linked In".
- ^ "The Official Queen Lizzard Photography Site".
- ^ "iTunes".
- ^ "Amazon".
External links
- [http://www.kinglizzard.com Official King Lizzard Site
- Photography by Queen Lizzard
- IMDB
- ASCAP titles
- King Lizzard at AllMusic
- King Lizzard at Big Noise Now
- King Lizzard on Yahoo! Music
- lizzard King Lizzard at Billboard.com
- Official MySpace site
- Official Facebook page
- Official King Lizzard Fan Site
Terra Mariana needs additional citations for verification.
Hi Cirt, FYI, all the facts you've tagged needing citations on Terra Mariana are from the sources provided in the article. Do you mean there needs to be specific pages listed from the sources below for each 'citation needed' tag? Also in some cases refs have been provided in the lede, so do you think it would be necessary to duplicate the ref in the article body as well?
Thanks! --Termer (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
I would like you to take a look at User:MichaelQSchmidt/Jonathan Keltz. There was an article about this fellow that was sent to AFD in January 2010.[17] As I myself commented back then, I felt that while the fellow might be seen to meet WP:ENT, there was simply not enough reliable coverage at that time upon which to build a decent BLP. That has changed. In the intervening 14 months, the fellow has received growing coverage and recognition he lacked originally. And with the new coverage, available only since the deletion,[18] I feel it benefits the project to have this new version of the article return to mainspace to further grow and be expanded. There was no flaw in the reasoning for original deletion... but this is not exactly the same as the article that was deleted, due to actor's career and coverage not sitting still over the last 14 months. I seek your approval in its return AND in it not being mistakenly speedied as a G4 recreation. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Just an additional note: RHaworth gave his blessing to an return to mainspace,[19] and sent me a link to the version he speedied, which I then found in a google cache.[20] I can well understand his deletion of that earlier version. Yikes. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
I hate having to keep bringing this up, but you were the deleting admin, so I'm going to come back to you to ask about whether or not I've managed to establish WP:N for the article yet? My only real other argument towards having it restored to mainspace as it is, is unfortunately still WP:OTHERSTUFF with several anime conventions in the European anime template at the bottom of the page having established even less notability.
This is also probably a sub-question to this, but would any imagery help the notability at all? TheChrisD Rants•Edits 22:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Carlson Young
Carlson Young is an American teen actress and Singer. she played Tiffany in As the Bell Rings. she appeared in True Blood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah797 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
OTRS request
Do you think you could expedite the processing on this image, permission for which was sent in by the subject of the photo? (I gather it is a self-take by webcam, and looks it) I'd really like to look efficient here, as Paul is a longtime acquaintance. Let me know as well if there is anything that needs doing.--Wehwalt (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, been quite busy lately, perhaps try another. -- Cirt (talk) 03:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
AfD
Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As a Peace-Loving Global Citizen (2nd nomination). Thanks. Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey!
Welcome back from your 2 months off! Hey, I have file mover on here, would you be willing to give it to me on Commons? CTJF83 17:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am a bit busy lately with other things. Perhaps try inquiring at the Village Pump on Commons? -- Cirt (talk) 02:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Ali Tim
Hello,
I have seen Ali Tim has been deleted. I do not understand why? However, I wouldn't get into the longevity of policies and guidelines laid down by Wikipedia, I request you to guide me on creating verifiable articles. Will highly appreciate your response! Have a good day! Samia BR (talk) 08:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Closure not comple
Hi Cirt, I just wanted to let you know that you may have missed a bottom template or something at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Wang. The blue box only reaches about halfway down. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
B1A4
I am curious as to why you decided that the B1A4 article should be deleted even after going through the articles for deletion process. From a clear count of numbers, 4 people were for it and 3 against and most those against said so before later information came up. Plus, the main reason against was over whether they met notability criteria, but I showed with sources that they did in more than one way. Plus, no one debated my findings so I thought they were a sure keep. Even if it was unclear, my understanding is that by default in that situation the article is kept.
You did not mention whatsoever what reason you gave for deletion as such I feel like the article should go under deletion review because your action makes no sense. It doesn't seem to follow the AfD page at all. To simplify things before that, would you mind explaining what you were thinking? Snowclrops (talk) 00:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Les Brown article deletion
You say that the evidence about Les Brown is unsupportable... that you "can not even find evidence for the one thing that ought to be possible, a marriage to Gladys Knight." Les Brown is real, and his work is real. It took me a couple of minutes to find a photo of [http://books.google.com/books?id=ijgDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32&dq=les+brown+gladys+knight+married&source=bl&ots=T_Ex5DChtD&sig=5gc90M_SZ6J6eKh8bZ3zXRLKxqY&hl=en&ei=XwVPTciGC46CsQPc5fjrCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=les%20brown%20gladys%20knight%20married&f=false the happy couple. And his service in the Ohio Legislature is an easily retrievable matter of public record. What's you beef with Les Brown, Cirt? I'm beginning to think that Wikipedia has become unsupportable. Roadturn (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cirt, I wondered if you wouldn't mind adding your thoughts to this discussion? Parrot of Doom 17:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Will there be a User Conduct RFC on the account's behavior? -- Cirt (talk) 05:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, possibly today. Parrot of Doom 06:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Good to see you back
Have a nice WikiBreak? The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 20:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Count me in - good to see you returning. Jusdafax 20:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 05:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
could you please explain why you closed as keep. I thought it was a relist or no consensus at best. LibStar (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hrm, let's give it some time to allow interested parties to do some research, and we can revisit the issue in a couple months time. -- Cirt (talk) 07:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
RFC discussion of User:Philip Baird Shearer
A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of Philip Baird Shearer (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Philip Baird Shearer. -- Parrot of Doom 10:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Portal:Scientology/Intro
- Sorry, the intro subpage was identical to the intro to the article Scientology. The first sentence hadn't been updated to what has been the intro to the article for around a month so I thought I would update it. Where can I request consensus to get it synchronized?--Jacksoncw (talk) 16:57, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Weazie
Sorry to intrude, but you've just blocked Weazie for vandalism, and I can't see any vandalistic edits from them. I'm trying to talk to the other side of that conflict now with Sempi, and it seems that Weazie wasn't vandalizing, and was discussing edits on the talk page. Am I missing something? Thanks in advance. Dayewalker (talk) 07:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Done. -- Cirt (talk) 07:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- This person, Daywalker, is twisting the truth and appeared out of nowhere to defend Weazie. Daywalker was not a part of the recent discussion. Obviously, Daywalker must be a friend of Weazie.
- In the discussion Weazie claims that I suggested removal of the whole section he deleted. This further proves that he is ignoring the discussion except for what he wanted to use as an excuse to delete things. What I wrote in the discussion is, "Maybe there shouldn't be a "Possible sources" section. The problem is not that the sources have been unreliable, the problem is the title of the section itself. I already suggested a solution at the very beginning of this discussion section."
- Weazie took my first sentence and used it as an excuse to delete the whole section, while ignoring the other sentences, suggesting that the title was the problem. So, in deleting the section entirely, without reading the other two sentences, nor the previous suggestion mentioned in the third, it proves Weazie was merely looking for excuses to delete things, while ignoring the rest of the discussion; even within the same paragraph! Sempi (talk) 07:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. And "for the record": I do not know who Dayewalker is. --Weazie (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Corruption. Sempi (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. And "for the record": I do not know who Dayewalker is. --Weazie (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
I didn't mention this is the report, but the multiple contributions deleted were not mine. I had no personal interest in reporting these deletions. They were all from other contributors that were engaging in the discussion, but were were not active at the moment and none of them had given any consensus to the deletion of their contributions.
One of them, Anythingyouwant had this to say, "I'm not going to bother arguing with you, or trying to satisfy you, because instead of modifying or rephrasing you prefer to completely delete material that is obviously relevant. Banging my head against the wall would be more useful. :-) Cheers" Anythingyouwant, appears to have given up and been chased away due to Weazie's repeated deletions. Sempi (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Deletion review for B1A4
An editor has asked for a deletion review of B1A4. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Done, relisted. -- Cirt (talk) 20:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Where you going with this, Cirt? GA review? You have my blessing. Great work--thanks! Drmies (talk) 04:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
RFC/U (Sempi)
Hi. I have created a Request for Comment concerning Sempi (talk · contribs). You can find it here. I'm notifying you personally because you are mentioned in the RFC/U as someone who tried in vain to get Sempi to improve his conduct vis-à-vis the Natural born citizen clause of the U.S. Constitution article. Since you were a user who tried and failed to resolve this dispute, you might wish to consider adding your name to the list of users "certifying" the RFC/U; at least two formal certifiers are required in order for an RFC/U to proceed. Richwales (talk · contribs) 06:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
No wonder you are defending the actions of this group to unfairly suppress and delete information from this article! You Rich Wales, seem to have a conflict of interest! (link removed)
Sempi (talk) 07:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cirt. While I have every faith in your closures of AfD, I am questioning the wisdom of reopening and relisting this especially when a deletion review was called for. IMO, until our requirements for WP:RS and WP:V are satisfied until notability is clearly asserted, this twice deleted article should remain deleted. These guys clearly have an agenda, demonstrated by their constant disruption of due process, harrassment, and personal attacks, and I am wondering if sock/meat is also part of the tactics. I have no personal interest in the outcome of this article other than that Wikipedia policy is acknowledged. Regards, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Feel free to comment at WP:DRV about it. -- Cirt (talk) 07:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm... seems like the DRV was opened, and closed, while I was asleep in my time zone. If the article passes with the new sources, that's fine by me of course, but that Snowclops is a rather persistent, and not altogether civil fellow. If I hadn't been involved, my finger would have been hovering over a uw button. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Pair Options
Hi Cirt, why did you decide that the Pair Options article should be deleted only after a few days ? this does not allow time for a due process. I would ask you to open it for deletion review again, for example I did not have time even to state my opinion, and I am not the article editor, PLUS, I have few concrete suggestions to the notability issue (references). Exotic Options are a complicated subject and due process should be given time .--Mikeruon (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Wow!
That was quick--I was in the midst of writing User:J.Gowers up for ANI. Thanks. Still, the way that user is editing they're heading for an indefinite block. Later, Drmies (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Unblock request of J.Gowers
Hello Cirt. J.Gowers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, Sandstein 17:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Mobility-as-a-Service
Why was this entry deleted about a year ago? Does a record exist of what the entry said before its deletion? I am curious to learn more about this subject and get a good definition.
Thanks.
Max 66.94.95.18 (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.jpg
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 15:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Santorum on Computing project
I haven't the foggiest why you added this to the computing project but I have reverted the notice as it seems to be totally unrelated. Dmcq (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, no worries, -- Cirt (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Oregon Triple Crown
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2c/Oregon_Triple_Crown.jpg/275px-Oregon_Triple_Crown.jpg)
- Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 06:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
My RFA
I am wondering what your concern is with regard to temperament. Thank you. N419BH 06:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Indications include a bit too quick with that delete tagging, which indicates brash decision making. -- Cirt (talk) 06:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough, though I'd characterize it as a misreading of policy rather than making decisions too fast. I'll go back to NPP and prove I've learned, and be back come July or August for another go. I hope I will have proved myself by then and you will be able to support along with the other opposers. Thank you for your input and constructive criticism, I truly appreciate it, though of course failing RFA is a bit disappointing. N419BH 07:07, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you do as you say, I would be more willing to reconsider my position at a later point in time for a subsequent candidacy. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Who knows, maybe you'll end up doing what Courcelles did with DeltaQuad and nominate me ;). Seriously though, I appreciate it. It's still open because I want to gather feedback now on what I can do to improve, hence asking what you meant by temperament. BTW you mention experience as well; are you referring to total experience or inexperience with CSD or something else? N419BH 07:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Both depth and breadth. -- Cirt (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- K, where would you like to see additional work? N419BH 07:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- A few more GAs, a few more DYKs, a bit of participation at AFD and/or other related types of discussions. Perhaps some participation on talk pages of other areas of the project, like RFCs, policy pages, etc. -- Cirt (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Much obliged, thank you. For what it's worth I have zero DYKs, most of my work involves improves existing articles rather than writing new ones. I've done a couple AFD discussions. Thanks again and I'll see you at RFA come summer. N419BH 07:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- A few more GAs, a few more DYKs, a bit of participation at AFD and/or other related types of discussions. Perhaps some participation on talk pages of other areas of the project, like RFCs, policy pages, etc. -- Cirt (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- K, where would you like to see additional work? N419BH 07:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Both depth and breadth. -- Cirt (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Who knows, maybe you'll end up doing what Courcelles did with DeltaQuad and nominate me ;). Seriously though, I appreciate it. It's still open because I want to gather feedback now on what I can do to improve, hence asking what you meant by temperament. BTW you mention experience as well; are you referring to total experience or inexperience with CSD or something else? N419BH 07:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you do as you say, I would be more willing to reconsider my position at a later point in time for a subsequent candidacy. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough, though I'd characterize it as a misreading of policy rather than making decisions too fast. I'll go back to NPP and prove I've learned, and be back come July or August for another go. I hope I will have proved myself by then and you will be able to support along with the other opposers. Thank you for your input and constructive criticism, I truly appreciate it, though of course failing RFA is a bit disappointing. N419BH 07:07, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
FAMTIES
Dear Cirt,
I hope all is well.
I jus recognized that the Famties page was deleted.
I had the opinion that this production team had more than enough success to be an important matter for wikipedia.
Can you pls let me know why you disagree? Is their any more information needed? Pls let me know.
Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radioenemy2012 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Cirt, you closed this AFD as delete yesterday, but apparently didn't actually delete the article, merely an apparent redirect. JFYI. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 08:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
I am surprised that you closed the decision based on two rather weak arguments to delete, while ignoring the other two comments there.--Huaiwei (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Done, now deleted, thanks! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hate to be a pain, but it appears Singapore Youth Festival Central Judging results for Chinese orchestra was tagged to the same AFD, so that has to go too. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 14:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Done. -- Cirt (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hate to be a pain, but it appears Singapore Youth Festival Central Judging results for Chinese orchestra was tagged to the same AFD, so that has to go too. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 14:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)