User talk:Jen67uv56

April 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to DevOps, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:28, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

There were no such links as I have no personal website on the subject, no affiliations with any site I reference, and am not promoting any product. There are a few websites in the DevOps space that I find value from and therefore will reference where I see fit within Wikipedia pages. This sites include devops.com, clouddeveloper.io, github.blog, resources.github.com, docs.gitlab.com, aws.amazon.com and azure.microsoft.com. T=You will find these sites and their pages referenced only. Devopsreviewer (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Devopsreviewer, Please have a read of WP:RS. Blogs and other self published sources shouldn't be used on Wikipedia. - MrOllie (talk) 21:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

I read it, thank you. Question for you then, if I see a link to https://devops.com/surprise-broad-agreement-on-the-definition-of-devops/ on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DevOps page (see #6) then is it correct that reference to any devops.com or clouddeveloper.io would then be ok since they are resources not associated with any business or a blog? Devopsreviewer (talk) 21:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Devopsreviewer, No, those need to be replaced with proper sources. There's no shortage of scholarly articles and books about devops, so there's really no reason to rely on blog posts. MrOllie (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

MrOllie thank you for your guidance. I will do my research and work on the page to get better links to more legitimate resources. I feel that page is being over used for marketing and link building purposes. Devopsreviewer (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 16:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

MrOllie I apologize, I was going off of your previous recommendations and editing where I felt was appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devopsreviewer (talk • contribs)

Adding self published bloggy stuff like developercloud.io is never appropriate. - MrOllie (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

MrOllie noted - this is a site I have found useful. It is not my own. Please do not try to out me.

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created DevOps, and I noticed that your username, "Devopsreviewer", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. SounderBruce 22:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)