User talk:Format

This is Format's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Format, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rklawton 13:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soap Opera

If an editor keeps reverting an article back more than 3 times, he or she is in violation of the 3 revert rule. If the changes seem to be vandalism to you, warn him (go to WP:Vandalism to find out how). If he vandalizes after a final warning (level 4) then you can report him to Administrators Intervention against Vandalism. If its not vandalism you can request a third opinion or take your issue to a Request for comment. Hope this helps. —Ocatecir ^Talk 02:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Preview, Group, Summarize

Thank you for your edits. Please consider 1) Using the Show Preview button (beside the Save Page button), 2) Grouping edits together to avoid clogging the page's edit History which makes it hard for fellow editors to monitor the edits (as you did here, 23 Feb. 2008), 3) Describing each edit with the Edit Summary box (above the Save Page button). Hu (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Template: Future television episode

I think you have Template: Future television episode mistaken for Template: Future television series. Template: Future television episode is for a current show that is airing, due to the nature of Big Brother and the live feeds some information could be posted on Wikipedia prior to an episode so that is why the template is there. Template: Future television series is for a future season/series of a TV Show. This template is currently on Big Brother 10 (U.S.) but will be switched to Template: Future television episode once the season starts. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 00:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fact tags

I think you're on the right track adding fact tags. However, when something just smacks of original research, someone's opinion, or just seems like a dumb thing to include in an article, I advise you to just remove it. Be bold! Happy editing - House of Scandal (talk) 03:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prisoner vs Prisoner: Cell Block H

Hi. I noticed your recent edits to 1987 and 1991 in British television regarding the soap Prisoner: Cell Block H. Thanks for refining the links to a more specific target. I've tweaked them a little further, however, as the series was known as Prisoner: Cell Block H rather than Prisoner in the UK, and used to appear in TV listings under that name. I hope this is all right, and happy editing. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

North Epping murders

Hi, seeking support to keep regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Epping murders. Do you have an opinion on that? Thanks Ajayvius (talk) 10:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Kennedy

Hi, just wanted to get your opinion on the Karl Kennedy page before I do anything here. I've noticed, for some reason, someone is going around the Neighbours pages and adding family trees. I really don't understand this though because for most of the characters this will be displayed under the relationships section in the infobox. Is it worthwhile taking these out of the character pages or should we keep them in? --5 albert square (talk) 01:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Soap Opera Rapid Aging Syndrome

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Soap Opera Rapid Aging Syndrome. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soap Opera Rapid Aging Syndrome (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Smarter

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Just saw the improvements you made to Get Smart which greatly improved its encyclopedic tone. Thank you! – A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 04:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neighbours

Hi!

I've noticed that you've made some edits to Neighbours today. I don't know if you're aware of this, but Neighbours is currently a good article nominee and any contributions to get it to this would be most welcome. You can find full details of what work needs carried out on the article and what work has already been carried out by going to Talk: Neighbours and you'll find it under the GA review section.

Incidentally, I notice that you removed the storylines section. Can I ask where this was moved to? Or was it just deleted? It's just that this is mentioned in the GA review that this was a section to be improved --5 albert square (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Format. You have new messages at 5 albert square's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there, I'm another editor who is helping to get the Neighbours article to GA status, just thought I'd come and introduce myself. I noticed you have just added some edits to the new titles section and wanted to let you know there is a discussion on the talk page about said section (length, lack of refs, etc). - JuneGloom07 (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user helped promote Neighbours to good article status.

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For your work in helping us get Neighbours to good article status. Thank you! 5 albert square (talk) 02:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--5 albert square (talk) 02:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manson article

Hi - I have reverted some of your changes and re-edited some others in the Charles Manson article. The reverts were executed because there were some really important points left out in your edits and one edit removed an entire paragraph. There has been a lot of tension amongst editors of this article of late, and it would really be appreciated by several of us if you would come and discuss edits - or at least make comments about your edits (especially the huge ones) before doing any more such as the two I completely reverted. I'm not trying to discourage you from editing the article, I'm just asking you to better communicate what you have in mind. Thanks. --SkagitRiverQueen

I don't know if you saw the reply I placed on my talk page, but I recognized too late that I made an error in thinking you had removed a paragraph completely, rather than moving it. My apologies. --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 04:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, in fact, an entire paragraph was not removed. Two paragraphs were merged into one, simply by removing a full stop between them. Please feel free to edit and not be discouraged by having your edits jumped on by anyone as they have been. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't notice, I told Format specifically that I *wasn't* trying to discourage him/her. Further, I didn't "jump" on anyone. False accusations and aspersions aren't wise nor advised, WHL. --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do not address me. I made no false accusations or cast no aspersions here, although you do appear to be trying to cast it that way. Keep your warnings to yourself. I told him not to be discouraged by having his edits jumped on. That applies anywhere, not just to you. Format, feel free to email me and keep it up. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHL - If you don't make comments about me, you won't have to worry about whether or not I address you. I gave no warnings. You most certainly did attempt to cast aspersions on my character with the "[don't] be discouraged" and "jumped on" comment - others in WP apparently believe your lies, but I'm not one of them. --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please do not address me, in any form. There were no comments made about you, only about his edits being reverted. Take it how you like, but please stop dragging your issues to Format's talk page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wildhartlivie. Format (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Format, I saw the edits you made and I liked them. I hope you will return to the article and continue. We need more editors at this article. I've been having troubles also having my edits stick so I'd love to see others participate. The more the merrier is the way I feel about it. Please do return and help this article, it's really needed. Happy editing, --CrohnieGal^Talk 11:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Manson article

Hi, there are questions and suggestions going on here. If you have the time and the interest would you mind popping in and giving any suggestion? I'm trying to bring the interest of editors back to this article as it is in need of some major work on it now. Thanks for listening to me, I hope to see you there, --CrohnieGal^Talk 17:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No index

Do you have any objections to removing the talk page from the search engine crawlers? Off2riorob (talk) 08:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edits to plot of The Rocky Horror Picture Show

Unfortunately the changes removed the encyclopedic tone. "Boy Toy" is considerable POV, is not mentioned in the film and does not improve the section. Tightening done removed pertanent information. A great deal of time and effort went into improving this article to gain GA status. Several editors envolved have formed a consensus. While further edits to the article are of course welcome, and bold editing is acceptable and encouraged, please consider the wording used on this article as it has undergone extensive discussion. Thanks.--Amadscientist (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dingo

I'm interested in the last edit you made at Australian Dingo. You left some reasoning in the box, but I wonder if I could get you to expand on it. Chrisrus (talk) 03:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate Crackles

Thanks for cleaning up my cleanups. Cagneya (talk) 15:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good head

How about moving "Tania Head" to "Alicia Esteve Head" since the IP address keeps removing the name from the article? Id have to have admin perform it. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yobbo

The article Yobbo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a dictionary definition, and WP is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jaque Hammer (talk) 03:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MTM episodes

Richard Kline certainly became notable in TV shortly after this episode (starring role in Three's Company for several years), and listing people who later became famous in the field (TV or film) is SOP. Considering this is a TV show, it is people known well in that field that are usually listed as guest starring in episode synopses. That is the standard practice anyway. I don't think being a Broadway star, major or not, makes McMartin notable in this oeuvre. Besides, based on the WP bio I find no evidence that McMartin was a "major" broadway star. He only seems to have appeared in a couple of successful musicals on Broadway, the rest of the listed shows being forgettable, failed, regional, or touring work. However, his presence on TV since, though not making him a "major" star in that field either, is adquate to include in the episode listing, so I agree he is notable enough to be included. Njsustain (talk) 21:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 1989 Alice Springs hot air balloon crash, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Danish and Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Filmizing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filmizing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmizing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Box (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mallaby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Mallaby (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CID (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Are You Being Served? may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

p.8. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sZ1WAAAAIBAJ&sjid=j-YDAAAAIBAJ&pg=857%2C8631034]</ref>)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Hawkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chard Hayward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Secret Life of Us, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Tredinnick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Format. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Format. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are You Being Served edit 23 January 2015

This edit adding ratings data from 1978 --

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Are_You_Being_Served%3F&diff=prev&oldid=643855849

Good work, keep it up. Or else. MartinSFSA (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion notice

An article that you have been involved in editing, r.e.: Soap Opera Digest Awards / Soapy Awards, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going >>>here<<<, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Lard Yao" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lard Yao has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 23 § Lard Yao until a consensus is reached. Paul_012 (talk) 00:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]