This user may have left Wikipedia. Jerry has not edited Wikipedia since September 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Saturday

2

November
2024

11:15 UTC

Jerry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

 EditNavigation bar


Home
Home

About
About

Talk
Talk

Logs
Logs

Index
Index

Tests
Tests

E-mail
E-mail

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jerry.

“

...delusional...kangaroo...

”

Please read my notice regarding deletion reviews.

Archives

User talk:Jerry/Archive 1:Through January 2007
User talk:Jerry/Archive 2:Through December 15, 2007
User talk:Jerry/Archive 3:Through March 30 2008
User talk:Jerry/Archive 4:Through August 15 2008ive
User talk:Jerry/Archive 5:Through 29 December 2008
User talk:Jerry/Archive 6:Through 20 February 2013
User talk:Jerry/Archive 7:Current Archive

Welcome to my talk page

You are also invited to email me at: jerry@lavoie.com. Occasionally I repost emails that I receive to this talk page, however I remove sensitive material and personally-identifying information, such as email address, first.

I frequently collapse sections once I think the conversation is done. The section will appear as a purple bar with a summary and a link that says "show". If you are leaving me a follow-on comment for such a collapsed section, please add the new comments below the collapsed section, NOT in it. If you add comments inside a collapsed section, I may never see them.

Jerry's 10 talk page rules

Please no foul language, threats or namecalling.
If there is any possibility (at all) that I meant well, assume that is the case, until proven or admitted otherwise. I will do the same.
Please append your wikisignature to all comments.
Please do not add any contentious material about me or any other living person.
Stop means stop. If we are in a heated argument, and I ask you to stop sending me messages on this page, then simply stop. If you think my conduct requires a review:
Do not leave messages containing any personally-identifying information about children, including yourself.
If you are here because a template showed up on your article or talk page, and you want to know why; 99% of the time, the information you seek is located right on the template itself. Please have the courtesy to read it first, then come here to complain or ask additional questions.
If I deleted an article/ image, etc, and you want to know why, please look at the log for the page... I usually leave a detailed explanation including a code like "CSD#G12, COPYVIO, Content was..." If you go to the deletion policy, you will likely find your answer faster than sending me a message.
If you do decide to ask me why your article, image, etc. got deleted, please tell me which one you are talking about. I delete many things a day, most days, and it can be very difficult for me to figure out which one you're talking about. This is particularly impossible if you are not logged-in, and your current IP Address is different than what it was when you created the article, uploaded the image, etc.
If you are here to complain about another editor, for whatever reason, please consider using one of the forums to alert all administrators of the problem. This will get you faster service, from among dozens of patrolling admins.

Notice regarding deletion reviews

This user is an active closing administrator at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you are considering initiating a formal review of a recent closing, it is requested that you attempt to have a discussion with me first, as suggested by the instructions at the top of WP:DRV. Please give me at least one day to respond, and keep in mind that we may be in different time zones. If you have a valid reason that my determination of consensus may be flawed, I do appreciate the opportunity to consider it and revert my own closing or explain to you my difference of opinion without the wikidrama that is often created at DRV. If you are here to drop me a template notice of a DRV that you have already initiated, but we have not discussed it yet, please consider closing that delrev and talking with me first. Just add the comment "please close this discussion until I have a chance to discuss this with the closing administrator per WP:DRV" to the discussion, and an administrator will surely close it shortly (as long as other editors have not significantly participated yet). Thank-you for your consideration.

New discussions

New Bridge in Kosovska Mitrovica - Date of construction

Hello Jerry, I saw your edit according to the date when this bridge was built. Video clips concerning riots of March, 2004 in Mitrovica show the same new bridge, e.g.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqZRLBqQjcs. Can you remember where the information "It was built in 2005 by the French KFOR." comes from? Can you give a reference for this? Thanks for the efforts, Greetings --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 03:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you are correct. I may have mistakenly used the date for another bridge construction project by KFOR, that of the one over the Bistrica River. According to a Google wire summary from Asia Africa Intelligence Wire, it seems that completion of the Bridge over the Ibar River was announced on March 18, 2004, and Mitrovica officials praised KFOR for opening the bridge to citizens on August 20, 2004. I do not have access to the full text, however, so no suitable citable source to put in the article, but this data should be enough to modify the article as it is not likely a contentious change. Perhaps somebody with access to LexusNexus could properly cite that change. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 13:08, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this hint, Jerry! LexisNexis is licensed at my library indeed, but I don't have got access at home and I won't visit the campus for the next weeks. For the moment it might be an important result that we have no sureness in the exact date yet. I have some doubts as related to the date of March 18, 2004 for there are some notes that seem to lead to a construction date before 2002, maybe 2000, and the rioting masses tried to cross the bridge even on March 17, 2004. The opening of August, 2004 might be a reopening after closing because of preceding ethnic tensions or so? But this is just wildcatting, I did not find any concrete specifications about that matter yet. Thanks again! Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found some concrete data now. Thanks for your kind support! Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 17:21, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Outstanding work! Thanks for your contributions. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 17:32, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, too! --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ISCL

Template:ISCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ISCL

Template:ISCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:19, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urdi pak motto.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Urdi pak motto.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Шαあるふぁмıq ☪ _{тαあるふぁʟκかっぱ}✍ @ 15:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IEEE technical societies

If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye, Buaidh 18:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member[reply]

Happy New Year Jerry!

Happy New Year!

Hello Jerry:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, BusterD (talk) 06:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BerwickBulldog.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Berwick colorkit.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riogate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riogate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riogate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vrac (talk) 23:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

thank you for the laugh. "I am a member of IEEE, and I have applied for patents. I have also eaten toast with melted cheese on it." BTW the article, from 2008, (is back at AfD.) HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Click remote.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Click remote.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Click remote.png

A tag has been placed on File:Click remote.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:36, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MinesOfSulphur.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MinesOfSulphur.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of places named after Guru Ram Das

The article List of places named after Guru Ram Das has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A list of non-notable places.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prevan (talk) 14:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CloseRat

Template:CloseRat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StankoBook.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StankoBook.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dimension (shampoo)

The article Dimension (shampoo) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find substantial in-depth sources that discussed this product, so I don't believe it passes WP:GNG. The link in the article is a single sentence mentioning that Dimension is being transferred from this branch of the company to that. I did a deep dive on Highbeam and Newspapers.com (because they would go back much farther than a simple GNews search) and while I found the product was mentioned somewhat frequently, it was never discussed substantially in any of the articles I located on those databases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nucor logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nucor logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romeroadbuild.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Romeroadbuild.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Johnson bar.png

The file File:Johnson bar.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Wvshs kit.png

The file File:Wvshs kit.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MorTaxRemains.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MorTaxRemains.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ReidBaer.png

The file File:ReidBaer.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Fish Belly" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fish Belly. Since you had some involvement with the Fish Belly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simatic S5

The article Simatic S5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, advertisement concerns

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polyamorph (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rotary jail patent cover.png

The file File:Rotary jail patent cover.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brent Taylor (actor)

The article Brent Taylor (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, only external link is IMDb. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Painted Game Term" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Painted Game Term. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#Painted Game Term until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Tot he" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tot he. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 7#Tot he until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 15:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Western Michigan Christian High School

The article Western Michigan Christian High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MAN-AS.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MAN-AS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NAD

Template:NAD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LPHS logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LPHS logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Cogs" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of Cogs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 23 § List of Cogs until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShowerBow.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ShowerBow.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]