User talk:Koikefan

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Koikefan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Hi! I hope I can make a request having an entry for Vance Larena. he belongs to the same management with Kelvin Miranda and Jane De Leon. Thanks! Beautyscars (talk) 09:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeremiah Lisbo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your recent editing history at Jeremiah Lisbo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 08:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Theroadislong. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Petersen Vargas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 07:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cong TV

Cong TV. References you need is in the career section. "Akala ko ako lang di marunong magbasa, ikaw rin pala. Ganti, ganti lang ba yan?" MaccWiki (talk) 06:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the sources. They don't mention catchphrases, so I am reverting it back. That section needs a reference. Koikefan (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Binasa mo ba talaga?" MaccWiki (talk) 06:45, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Yung infobox ginawang section. Hahaha" MaccWiki (talk) 07:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MAG BASA KA NGA. MaccWiki (talk) 07:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple dispute resolution filings

Only one form of dispute resolution may be requested at the same time. Your requests for a Third Opinion and a case request at Dispute Resolution Noticeboard have been declined. (The DRN filing was, correctly, removed due to the deletion nomination, but even if that had not been the case it would have been declined due to the RFC that you filed at the article talk page.) If the article survives deletion and the RFC produces no consensus after running for its normal length of 30 days, then you may reconsider other forms of dispute resolution. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Black Sheep Productions has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Black Sheep Productions. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Black Sheep Productions has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Black Sheep Productions. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Sheep Productions has been accepted

Black Sheep Productions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The IdeaFirst Company (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Their own website is a primary source, IMDb is not a reliable source for anything as it is user edited, and interviews are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The IdeaFirst Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The IdeaFirst Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dwein Baltazar has been accepted

Dwein Baltazar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The IdeaFirst Company has been accepted

The IdeaFirst Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivamax (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivamax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vivamax, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 19:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whether the Weather is Fine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Tribune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brillante Mendoza

Hi. Please note that everything you add to an article must be verified with reliable sources, and the burden is with you to provide them. Please do not add unsourced content into an article, such as the edits you made to Brillante Mendoza. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please supply the sources as you add the information, it's that simple. And stop edit-warring, as you can be blocked for that. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you restore that info once more without providing any sources, you will be reported for edit-warring. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Brillante Mendoza

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 23:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vivamax has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vivamax. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reinstated edits

Be aware with edits like [1] when you reinstate another account's edits (e.g. a blocked editor) you assume responsibility for those edits yourself. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Ctrlwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Andrea Brillantes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ctrlwiki (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino artists nominated for deletion

Good day. A number of Filipino artists, like Kier Legaspi and Ana Roces, have been nominated for deletion here. Since you participated in similar discussions before, like this one, your contribution to their respective deletion discussions would be a big help. I'll participate in those as well. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 13:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivamax (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk:Viva Entertainment. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

Please discuss the proposed split at Talk:Viva Entertainment.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivamax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vivamax, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Koikefan! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Filmography Listing Noontime and Variety Show Appearances, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vivamax

Hello, Koikefan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vivamax, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]