User talk:Maheshp034
March 2024[edit]
Hello, I'm Graywalls. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Polyethylene terephthalate have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Appears to be used for the purpose of advertising shorning prismaneconsulting.com into pages Graywalls (talk) 09:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)- {In 2016, annual production of PET was 56 million tons. The biggest application is in fibres (in excess of 60%), with bottle production accounting for about 30% of global demand.} this production capacity is outdated now i have updated capacity for 2022 [Global PET resins market crossed 28,000 kilo tons in 2022, grown at an average annual rate of 4% since 2016. Representing a nearly 45% share, Asia Pacific is the largest PET resins consumer globally.] its not advertising. please unblock me. Maheshp034 (talk) 09:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is the source you used, which you placed into multiple articles. It's of questionable credibility and there is a chance such a link may lead to the purchase of that outrageously expensive report advertised at the source you cited from the India based consulting company. Graywalls (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I understand your concern about the credibility of the source I used and the potential for it to lead to the purchase of a costly report. Ensuring the reliability of sources is paramount in maintaining the integrity of information presented. I will review the source and its content to determine if it meets the standards of credibility necessary for inclusion in the articles. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
- I respectfully request that you reconsider the block placed on my account and grant me the opportunity to resume contributing to Wikipedia. I assure you that I am fully committed to upholding Wikipedia's standards of quality and reliability. Maheshp034 (talk) 06:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello ChatGPT, please let Maheshp034 know that appeals on Wikipedia need to be written by a human. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- yes please unblock me. Maheshp034 (talk) 10:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello ChatGPT, please let Maheshp034 know that appeals on Wikipedia need to be written by a human. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is the source you used, which you placed into multiple articles. It's of questionable credibility and there is a chance such a link may lead to the purchase of that outrageously expensive report advertised at the source you cited from the India based consulting company. Graywalls (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)