User talk:MarkiPoli
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, MarkiPoli. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MarkiPoli. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Child of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for deletion
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Child of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MarkiPoli. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Merger discussion for 2021 efforts to remove Donald Trump
[edit] An article that you have been involved in editing—2021 efforts to remove Donald Trump—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for August 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fisk (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2023 AFL season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- I did cite the official AFL statement on the matter. I guess the only thing not supported is the fact it was on Fox Footy and Kayo? There is another source[1] that mentions they are on fox footy and kayo. Unless i've missed something else? MarkiPoli (talk) 11:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Election denial movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. rootsmusic (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I came across your comment from Sep 2023. I agree that it makes sense to separate out the conspiracy theory section of the Great Reset article: the section itself is anemic, but also adding to it would be a net negative for the full article. Feel free to fork, it's a very good idea. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll start doing a draft when I get around to it. MarkiPoli (talk) 12:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prostitution in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Courier Mail.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Student union.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
RSN Telegraph trans issues RFC
[edit]Did you finish the first comment you left in this edit? You've left a dangling "I think the" before your signature that might be an incomplete thought, something belonging elsewhere in the comment or the remnant something you decided against writing (or something else). Thryduulf (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was going to say the moratorium was unnecessary since the RfC was still going but I put that down below in the moratorium discussion section but forgot to delete the first part of my original statement MarkiPoli (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
- ^ "Practice match fixture: Check out who your club is playing". afl.com.au. 31 January 2023.