(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:PARAKANYAA - Wikipedia Jump to content

User talk:PARAKANYAA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About the Draft:The_Zhao_Fuqiang_Case

[edit]

Hello, PARAKANYAA.Sorry to hear that you have rejected my off-draft apply of Draft:The_Zhao_Fuqiang_Case, I hope you can give specific suggestions for improvement. Besides, you mentioned that there are problems with this article in neutrality perspective. I am confused and hope you can explain it because it is translated from a Chinese version.Hzt0208042508415531 tw (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hzt0208042508415531 tw Hi! I will discuss this with you on the draft's talk page, so others can see it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi PARAKANYAA, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 00:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death for comments about the article, and Talk:The Order of the Solar Temple: The Temple of Death/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nya Doxa

[edit]

Hey, I've added some sources, if you want to take a new look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nya Doxa. In this case, I think it was very difficult to find anything from home without access to a Swedish newspaper archive (a paid service), but I found some long articles about the publishing house from the late 1990s and early 2000s. /Julle (talk) 08:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Julle Thank you very much for finding sources :) Yeah, I did try, but I had no luck. I withdrew. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

[edit]
Thank you for the comments on the List of generation IX Pokémon nomination! I know I sent it to the wrong place by accident, but I greatly appreciate the comments and insight all the same. :) Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999 You're welcome! Good luck with the FLC! PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PARAKANYAA,

You can't withdraw and close an AFD if there are any Delete votes cast which there were in this AFD. Please revert your closure and re-tag the article. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz My interpretation was that due to the fact that the only vote was based on my nomination's assertion of there being no sources it did not otherwise count, but I guess that is wrong, so okay, I have done so. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for doing so. While it might seem like I'm scolding you, I'm actually trying to save you from a trip to Deletion Review in case your closure was contested. Believe me, having your actions scrutinized at DRV can be a brutal experience, as bad as ANI. It might seem bureaucratic but it's best to abide by the rules even if it means that the AFD is open a few extra days. Liz Read! Talk! 19:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]