User talk:Stefanomione

Archives

Archive 1 (2005 – 2010)
Archive 2 (2011)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk 00:08, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Members of the OAS[edit]

Category:Members of the OAS, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Books about disinformation[edit]

Category:Books about disinformation, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Books about information[edit]

Category:Books about information, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Works about writers by writer[edit]

Category:Works about writers by writer, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Works about people by occupation[edit]

Category:Works about people by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Works about politicians by politician[edit]

Category:Works about politicians by politician, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marxist journals[edit]

Hi, I see you created this category, but it mixes some very different publications: magazines and academic journals. We have different category trees for the two and your cat kind of messes that up. Would it be acceptable to rename it to "Marxist periodicals"? Alternatively, you could rename it to "Marxist magazines" and remove the academic journals. In any case, it is not clear to me how this new cat differs from "communist magazines". --Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about opera[edit]

Category:Films about opera, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Category:Terminology by author[edit]

Category:Terminology by author, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about writers[edit]

Category:Works about writers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 18:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Psychoanalytic terminology[edit]

Category:Psychoanalytic terminology, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terminology of Carl Jung[edit]

Category:Terminology of Carl Jung, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:42, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Giacomo Casanova and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Giacomo Casanova and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Mark Twain and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Mark Twain and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Leo Tolstoy and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Leo Tolstoy and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Hunter S. Thompson and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Hunter S. Thompson and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about William Shakespeare and his works[edit]

Category:Works about William Shakespeare and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Ayn Rand and her works[edit]

Category:Works about Ayn Rand and her works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Marcel Proust and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Marcel Proust and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Edgar Allan Poe and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Edgar Allan Poe and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about H. P. Lovecraft and his works[edit]

Category:Works about H. P. Lovecraft and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Franz Kafka and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Franz Kafka and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about James Joyce and his works[edit]

Category:Works about James Joyce and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about L. Ron Hubbard and his works[edit]

Category:Works about L. Ron Hubbard and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Robert E. Howard and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Robert E. Howard and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Ernest Hemingway and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Ernest Hemingway and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Sigmund Freud and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Sigmund Freud and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Ian Fleming and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Ian Fleming and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Charles Dickens and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Charles Dickens and his works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Divine Comedy (Dante)[edit]

Category:The Divine Comedy (Dante), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 17:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of categories[edit]

Hi,

I have seen alot of category creations by you, and would like to say good work, the category system does need articulating in many respects. Just a suggestion however that you discuss a class of categories before creating them to allow others to suggest different names etc. Im not sure where the appropiate place to do this is though, as many projects ignore category suggestions, but let me know if you find one!

Thanks

Brad7777 (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ban from automatically modifying categories[edit]

Hello Stefanomione, with this edit, in enacting a consensus of the community reached at the Administrator's Noticeboard, I hereby inform you that:

a.) You are banned from using any gadgets or other automated tools (hotcat in particular) to modify categories in any way. This includes, but is not limited only to, creating a category page, adding pages to a category, changing a page from one category to another, etc. This restriction may be lifted in the future IF you have shown to be consistently following the second restriction (b, below) over a decent period of time, absolutely no less than 3 months (with at least 6 months being preferrable).

b.) Also that if any (presumably manually done, per the restriction above) category creation or modification done by you is contested, you must stop and discuss, gaining a consensus before continuing, per WP:BRD.

Violation of these restrictions may result in being blocked.

The discussion leading to the ban may be viewed here. Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 13:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Psychoanalytic theory[edit]

You appear to be depopulating the pre-existing Category:Psychoanalytic theory in favour of your own newly created Category:Psychoanalytic terminology, with the edit summary "refine category." Why can't theoretical concepts exist in both categories? And should they not? On what basis have you decided that these articles should be diffused to your preferred category? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, those theoretical concepts shouldn't exist in eleven categories: Category:Psychoanalytic theory, Category:Psychoanalysis, Category:Freudian psychology, Category:Sigmund Freud, Category:Jacques Lacan, Category:Gilles Deleuze, Category:Félix Guattari Category:Relational psychoanalysis, Category:Psychodynamics and even in Category:Postmodern theory and Category:Structuralism. That is why I concentrate them in one category. An example: the page The Imaginary (psychoanalysis) placed in Category:Postmodern theory and in Category:Structuralism. Stefanomione (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Where do you get 11? I've not seen anywhere near that level of category clutter on affected articles. But I've no specific objection to what you're doing in this category area, at least for now. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terminology of Gilles Deleuze[edit]

Category:Terminology of Gilles Deleuze, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terminology of Sigmund Freud[edit]

Category:Terminology of Sigmund Freud, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terminology of Félix Guattari[edit]

Category:Terminology of Félix Guattari, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terminology of Jacques Lacan[edit]

Category:Terminology of Jacques Lacan, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about creative works[edit]

Category:Works about creative works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crime by medium[edit]

Category:Crime by medium, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 21:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by period[edit]

Category:Works by period, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pornographic works and media[edit]

Category:Pornographic works and media, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Erotic works and media[edit]

Category:Erotic works and media, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about creators[edit]

Category:Works about creators, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pornographic films by genre[edit]

Category:Pornographic films by genre, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rebellions by region[edit]

Category:Rebellions by region I don't understand the purpose of this category. It seems you've just stuck a bunch of random rebellions into it. What are you trying to do here? SnowFire (talk) 20:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listing rebellions that took place in specific regions (not countries), the way people/culture is listed in Category:ethnic groups by region or Category:Culture by region. The pages/rebellions in this category are all named after the regions where they started. Stefanomione (talk) 21:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific about what the category would look like if it was "perfect" and had every appropriate revolt and subcategories & such? Is it specifically for "revolts which happen to have a region mentioned in their name" or "revolts that crossed national boundaries and aren't easily classified?" Because as it stands, it's a hodgepodge of random rebellions across the entire world, so it really just means "Revolts." The categories you link to aren't really the same; they are high-parent categories of "Xs by continent" with a few other options (like in Culture, which covers Art / Music / Dance etc. by a more specific subcategory). This appears to be a low-level "actually includes specific revolts" category, except that every revolt happened in a "region," loosely defined. SnowFire (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It will contain "revolts that crossed national boundaries and aren't easily classified". What do you propose: rename, deletion or merging with Category:Rebellions ? Stefanomione (talk) 23:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don't really see the use. Many of the revolts don't really qualify - Catalan Revolt and Revolt of the Barretinas took place in Catalonia, and while somewhat involving France, should easily be part of Spanish Revolutions. Telangana Rebellion is part of Indian rebellions. Even when a revolt does cross countries, it can just be part of both countries's revolt subcategories. I'd say deletion / potential merging, except most of these are already in the proper categories already. SnowFire (talk) 23:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will delete. Thank You for the suggestions. Stefanomione (talk) 23:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by period[edit]

Category:Works by period, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Works[edit]

I reverted the proposed deletion of aesthetics literature. There are a bunch of other categories that could effect. I started a discussion about it at WikiProject Philosophy. Greg Bard (talk) 06:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should be "that could affect." Use "impact" if you're not sure.Lestrade (talk) 00:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

At some point in my youth I had mastered effect/affect. However at some point recently I read (on the internet!) that effect is almost always a verb and affect is almost always a noun. So I am ruined now. Thanks for the correction.Greg Bard (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Internet posting could be by an 18-year old Boeotian on pot. Don't trust it.Lestrade (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Category:Novels by time period of setting[edit]

Category:Novels by time period of setting, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films by time period of setting[edit]

Category:Films by time period of setting, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths by era[edit]

Category:Deaths by era, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Literature by era[edit]

Category:Literature by era, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Globalization terminology[edit]

Category:Globalization terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. KarlB (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Slavery in the United States[edit]

Hi. I just created a subcategory for documentary films about slavery in the United States. But you may wish to create some other categories for other types of works about... 14:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Archive inactive threads on your talk page?[edit]

I noticed you have 346 threads on your talk page. I was worried my browser was going to crash from the largeness of your talk page. How about moving some of those threads to archive pages? (Example: User talk:EarthFurst/Archive 1) You could either go simple (Archive_1, Archive_2 etc), or archive by topic (Admin, Technical, whatever). --EarthFurst (talk) 06:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I do this for you? See WP:Archive. This user page is so large that it is really unsuitable for conversation (under some browsers). If you don't reply then I propose to go ahead. – Fayenatic London 22:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -

Done – Fayenatic London 14:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Diasporas[edit]

Category:Diasporas, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Works and media categories[edit]

Hello, Stefanomione. You have new messages at Category talk:Works and media by interest.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Category:Philosophical works[edit]

Category:Philosophical works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Greg Bard (talk) 03:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Journals by ideology[edit]

Category:Journals by ideology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Community of interest[edit]

Category:Community of interest, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category deletions[edit]

Please do not nominate categories for speedy deletion in the way that you have been doing. There is no criterion for speedy deletion that covers these sorts of nominations. There are two courses of action that follow protocol. One is to nominate the category for deletion under CFD, where it would likely be uncontroversial. The other, and probably more what you're looking for, is to nominate for speedy deletion under criterion C1, for empty categories. There is a four-day waiting period attached to this criterion, so deletion will not be immediate. But that is the proper protocol to follow for category deletions. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a general comment, there are way too many categories in WP. Some articles have almost a page full of categories. Too many categories are simply an exercise in programing and are not needed. If there is anyone working to clean up many categories on that note he/she has my general support. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category tweek[edit]

Before I got involved above, I just wanted to drop in and say thanks for refining some of the categories on Bibliography of early American naval history page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Feminist journals[edit]

Category:Feminist journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 14:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marxist journals[edit]

Category:Marxist journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs by theme[edit]

Category:Photographs by theme, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs by war[edit]

Category:Photographs by war, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for List of books about philosophy [edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of books about philosophy , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Anthrophilos (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC) Anthrophilos (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Argentine popes[edit]

Category:Argentine popes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —teb728 t c 07:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buildings and structures of the Arab Spring[edit]

Category:Buildings and structures of the Arab Spring, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Revolution landmarks[edit]

Category:Revolution landmarks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Novels about the media[edit]

Stefanomione, I see that you've been changing things around in the last hour since I posted the CFD template for this category. Could you please tell me what else you plan to add to the category? I'm entirely serious -- 'please give me an answer right here as soon as possible. If I think it looks like it will be a viable category, I will withdraw the CFD without starting a discussion on the CFD page -- which would save both of us the bother of dealing with that. Thanks! Cgingold (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I worked without planning, just made some combinations ... Some of the articles/categories I added should have been in there (Category:Novels about the media) since 2007, the year I created it ... Stefanomione (talk) 09:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, I have 2 more questions for you. 1) Are you planning on adding anything else to the category?? 2) I see that you just created a brand new category, Category:Novels about journalism. But what purpose does that serve, when it is entirely redundant to Category:Novels about journalists?? Cgingold (talk) 09:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1) Some novels about advertising (Tom Wolfe, ...), public relations (Kurt Vonnegut, ...) ... But it seems not all novels have their articles yet ... 2) We have 'Novels about filmmaking' and 'Novels about actors/film producers/script writers' ... They are sub-categories, not redundant ones. Similarly, we could have 'Novels about journalism' (= about the mechanics of the "industry", written by such French authors as Zola and Balzac) AND 'Novels about journalists' (= about the people, not the mechanics). 'Hollywood novels' = about the industry, 'Novels about actors' = about the people working in it. Let me demonstrate it to you in the next days, adding more articles. Stefanomione (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then -- I will hold off for now. But PLEASE BE MORE CAREFUL about which articles you put into which categories. I just removed 2 of the 3 articles you added to the new Category:Novels about journalism: The Spoiler is about journalists -- and The New Journalism isn't even a novel, ferkrisake. And also, PLEASE exercise a little restraint on those parent cats. I just removed TWO redundant parent cats that you added to Category:Novels about war correspondents. I will take another look in a couple of days. Best, Cgingold (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category names[edit]

Category:Marxist journals and Category:Journals about Marxism: What on Earth is the difference supposed to be?

And concerning Category:Journals about philosophers, that category name is not really appropriate. Strictly speaking, these journals are not about the persons, but about their thinking. "Journals about philosophers" suggests that we are dealing with biographical publications, which is absolutely not the case. --Randykitty (talk) 19:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abstractly speaking, what should be the difference between Category:Nazi journals and Category:Journals about Nazism: the first one is edited 'for' an ideology, the second is 'about' an ideology. Concerning the philosophers: we can have biographical books, novels, short stories, films, documentary films and periodicals (magazines and journals) about writers and philosophers. Stefanomione. I just created a missing category. (talk) 19:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that distinction between "for" and "about" is way too subtle. Most journals will fall somewhere in between. As for the biographical works, yes, of course we can have cats about writers. That is exactly the point here: the cat you created is no about journals that discuss the life of some philosophers. It's about journals that investigate a certain school of thought. That is something completely different. These journals are empathically not biographical journals. --Randykitty (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a subtle but essential distinction: works written 'for' an ideology are categorized in Category:Works by ideology, works 'about' ideologies are (evidently) placed in Category:Works about ideologies. In my opinion, a work can never "fall somewhere in between" - Just consider the adopted point of view: polemic or scientific. Concerning the philosophers: I agree, Category:Journals about philosophers and there works and thought is more suitable. Hundreds of categories could be renamed that way (but for reasons of elegance, they aren't): Category:Works about writers, Category:Works about journalists, Category:Works about film directors and producers, ... 20:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Stefanomione (talk)

You're talking about journals, which consist of issues filled with multiple articles. I can very well imagine a journal publishing both articles about an ideology and for an ideology and, hence, falling in between. Having unclear cats like this will just lead to people more or less randomly assigning articles to one or the other cat. As for the philosophers, are you just being obtuse or are you really not getting the point? Those journals are not about the philosophers, they are about a school of thought. There's a whole world of difference. Philosophers are just a different kind of beast from film directors, just as academic journals are very different from magazines. --Randykitty (talk) 21:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A journal falling in between can be placed in both categories - we don't have to abolish structures that fit for 80-90 % of the articles. Undoubtedly, most journals have hagiography sections, so they are about the philosophers and the school of thought they created - the man and his time/school are intertwined (e.g. no Nietzsche without his abhorring of religion and personal subjugation, no Marx without 19-century German industrial life, ...). As for the comparison philosophers vs film directors ... most French directors adopt a (philosophical/ideological) worldview: Nouvelle Vague, French Impressionist Cinema, ... But we don't have to rename to Category:Works about film directors and producers and their thought. I understand your point: most categories are not accurately named for reasons of implicit meaning/understanding - so what do you propose for the ones above ? Stefanomione (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm what to do with them. Let's see: they're confusing, they're not useful. Mmmm, tough call. Perhaps we could just do away with them? --Randykitty (talk) 23:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your valuable work is still noted[edit]

2nd Barnstar awarded (after 6 years) to Stefanomione for prolonged services to Wikipedia categories by User: Giano

I am still watching you and your edits. Your valuable work is noted, if not always commented on and appreciated. Well done Stefanomione. Ciao Giano 20:09, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Novels set on the New York City Subway[edit]

Category:Novels set on the New York City Subway, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Michael Moore[edit]

Category:Works about Michael Moore, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Racist works[edit]

Category:Racist works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1905 Russian Revolution[edit]

Category:1905 Russian Revolution, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about the 1905 Russian Revolution[edit]

Category:Films about the 1905 Russian Revolution, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of the 1905 Russian Revolution[edit]

Category:People of the 1905 Russian Revolution, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Assassinated terrorists[edit]

Category:Assassinated terrorists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Foreign hostages in Iraq[edit]

Category:Foreign hostages in Iraq, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Foreign hostages in Afghanistan[edit]

Category:Foreign hostages in Afghanistan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former Al-Qaeda leaders[edit]

Category:Former Al-Qaeda leaders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former FBI Most Wanted Terrorists[edit]

Category:Former FBI Most Wanted Terrorists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2011 Japanese nuclear incidents and accidents[edit]

Category:2011 Japanese nuclear incidents and accidents, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Karl Marx and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Karl Marx and his works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and his works[edit]

Category:Works about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and his works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 18:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about The Godfather[edit]

Category:Works about The Godfather, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Topics in fiction[edit]

Category:Topics in fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Personality of Adolf Hitler[edit]

Category:Personality of Adolf Hitler, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works set in former countries[edit]

Category:Works set in former countries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works set on ships[edit]

Category:Works set on ships, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kurdish guerrillas[edit]

Category:Kurdish guerrillas, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 10:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentary films about music genres[edit]

Category:Documentary films about music genres, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Postmodern terminology[edit]

Category:Postmodern terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentary films about the Gallipoli Campaign[edit]

Category:Documentary films about the Gallipoli Campaign, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 16:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sniper fiction[edit]

Category:Sniper fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Areas controlled by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant[edit]

Category:Areas controlled by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 12:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Carlito's Way[edit]

Category:Carlito's Way, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Claude Perdriel[edit]

Hi, I'm Newrunner769. Stefanomione, thanks for creating Claude Perdriel!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Well you really need a lot of stuff, See tags for details on how to improve

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Newrunner769 (talk) 21:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claude Perdriel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Challenges. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentary films about election campaigning in the United States[edit]

Category:Documentary films about election campaigning in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historians of American media[edit]

Hmmm, you've challenged me to figure out who else belongs there, though you've put two of the top ones in there! Cheers.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 00:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Attacks on marketplaces in Iraq[edit]

Category:Attacks on marketplaces in Iraq, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terrorist incidents in Iraq by type[edit]

Category:Terrorist incidents in Iraq by type, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terrorist incidents by type[edit]

Category:Terrorist incidents by type, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Rizzoli year of birth and year of death[edit]

Okay so I was looking at your page for Andrea Rizzoli and the year of birth and year of death are both VERY different then the Italian wiki page. Wgolf (talk) 23:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right ... Those are the dates of his son, Angelo Rizzoli (1943-2013) ... Stefanomione (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to fix the dates and add some refs to your article! Wgolf (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Media analysis websites[edit]

Category:Media analysis websites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fgnievinski (talk) 01:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Great Depression musicals[edit]

Category:Great Depression musicals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Newspapers by city of publication[edit]

Category:Newspapers by city of publication, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fgnievinski (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Books by discipline[edit]

Category:Books by discipline, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fgnievinski (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jihadi John & Beatles (terrorist cell)[edit]

Hi Stephan. I reverted a couple of your recent cat edits (Jihadi John & The Beatles (terrorist cell)). The categories you've set up don't really flow in English and, that aside, I'm not convinced that they improve the categorisation. Has there been a discussion on this that I could read? Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concepts in film theory[edit]

Category:Concepts in film theory, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia events[edit]

Category:Wikipedia events, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 07:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia events[edit]

Category:Wikipedia events, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 07:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Newspaper publishers (people)[edit]

Category:20th-century newspaper publishers (people) by nationality, has been proposed for speedy upmerging to Category:20th-century newspaper publishers (people). NB: this category has only 3 subcategories and one parent category. The other 4 categories by century in Category:Newspaper publishers (people) by century do not have this subcategory. Hugo999 (talk) 00:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of German intervention against ISIL for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article German intervention against ISIL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German intervention against ISIL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.GreyShark (dibra) 17:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli involvement in the Guatemalan Civil War listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Israeli involvement in the Guatemalan Civil War. Since you had some involvement with the Israeli involvement in the Guatemalan Civil War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GreyShark (dibra) 06:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SCW&ISIL general sanctions notice[edit]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. GreyShark (dibra) 21:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Stefanomione, you posted on Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in response to the Greyshark09's notification. However that page isn't a talk page but a log of notifications, blocks and bans with some context at the top. It is not one of the Wikipedia pages that's intended to have comments/discussions on it. I therefore suggest you delete your comment from there and raise it somewhere else, perhaps User:Greyshark09's page. Banak (talk) 00:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm DexDor. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Category:World War I raids have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DexDor^(talk) 04:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Secession by region has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Secession by region, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crimes committed by asylum seekers has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Crimes committed by asylum seekers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dissolution of the European Union has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Dissolution of the European Union, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TDL (talk) 06:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Greek withdrawal from the eurozone has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Greek withdrawal from the eurozone, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 22:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Operations of the Inter-Services Intelligence has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Operations of the Inter-Services Intelligence, which you created, has been nominated for merging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Whizz40 (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Come un uomo sulla terra[edit]

There is not a single word in the article about this film addressing "illegal" immigration to Europe. Please don't restore the category without explaining on the talk page why it applies, with examples. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Warfare terminology has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Warfare terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 22:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2008-2015 European migrant crisis[edit]

Stef, I just noticed the long discussion on the Category migrant crisis. Do you think we need an article on European migration crisis 2008-2014?E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely yes ! We need even more. In analogy with Great European immigration wave to Argentina and the first and second wave in the Emigration from Africa, we need

European migration wave (1989-2008). Crisis or Wave. The Fall of the Berlin Wall triggered the East-West immigration wave in Europe. See Enlargement of the European Union and Migrations from Poland since EU accession.
European migration crisis (2008-2014). Crisis or wave. First wave South-North (via Libya and Tunesia - Sfax) that triggered the Arab Spring, just like the émigrés of France triggered the French Revolution.
European migration crisis (2015-present)

Stefanomione (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transport disasters related to the European migrant crisis has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Transport disasters related to the European migrant crisis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Mitty[edit]

How is the Secret Life of Walter Mitty a work about photojournalism (as in the category you just added to it)? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2016 Brussels bombings has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:2016 Brussels bombings, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 04:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Perpetrators of the 2016 Brussels bombings has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Perpetrators of the 2016 Brussels bombings, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Parsley Man (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Perpetrators of the November 2015 Paris attacks has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Perpetrators of the November 2015 Paris attacks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 10:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victims of x, attacks on y[edit]

Why are you removing people from the victims of Islamic terrorism categories and replacing them with attacks on y categories? I don't see any relationship between victim categories and attacks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.50.121 (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Work / categories in progress ... Later, I will create inside some of these categories "victims of x (terror) attack".Stefanomione (talk) 20:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about astronomy has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works about astronomy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Economic works has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Economic works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories by art has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Categories by art, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 20:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about the development of disciplines has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works about the development of disciplines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about the history of disciplines has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works about the history of disciplines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works in the philosophy of disciplines has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works in the philosophy of disciplines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of disciplines has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:History of disciplines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophy of disciplines has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Philosophy of disciplines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stefanomione. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mike V • Talk 16:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about your editing patterns[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Shawn in Montreal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political works has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Political works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:48, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths by American drone strikes during the Syrian Civil War has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Deaths by American drone strikes during the Syrian Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 00:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to a community sanction[edit]

The following sanction has been imposed on you:

~~You have been indefinitely topic banned from creating or changing categories.~~ You have been indefinitely topic banned from participation at WP:CFD and from creating or changing categories (revised 19:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Bishonen | talk.)

You have been sanctioned because your "unending torrent of category edits" and apparent indifference to opposition to your category creations and changes has exhausted the community's patience.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at this ANI discussion. The sanction has been recorded here. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 17:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about disciplines has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works about disciplines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about the medical world has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works about the medical world, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by discipline has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works by discipline, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories by discipline has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Categories by discipline, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Artefacts has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Artefacts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by type has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works by type, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical works by country has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Historical works by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about the Holy Grail legend has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works about the Holy Grail legend, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Linguistic units of information has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Linguistic units of information, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Units of information (cognitive processes) has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Units of information (cognitive processes), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Units of morphological analysis has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Units of morphological analysis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Imperialism terminology has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Imperialism terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mental structures has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Mental structures, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]