User talk:Whohe!

Images

Whohe, Thanks for your edits in Greg Matthews but copyrighted images are not allowed to be used in wikipedia. Tintin 22:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've now tagged your images with the "no license" template. All images have to have not only a source (which you supplied, thank you) but also a copyright tag explaining why we're allowed to use it. In most cases, we cannot use photos taken from other websites, unless we have the permission of the photographer or photo agency.

If an image doesn't have a source and a copyright tag, it is liable to be deleted any time after a seven-day waiting period.

I'm sorry about that, after you took the trouble to find the images. The articles look much better with images, but unfortunately it's illegal to use them, and as one of the top sites on the web we're likely to get sued if we do.

Thanks,

Stephen Turner (Talk) 12:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cricket

Welcome to Wikipedia! You may wish to join WikiProject Cricket, a project that organises all the information on cricket here. Help is always needed and appreciated! Da Gizza ^{Chat (c)} 04:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

South African FC cricket teams

Thanks for the articles on South African cricket teams - I was planning to do them myself but I really appreciate that you've done them. By the way, where did you find the information on what regions the teams represent? Sam Vimes 19:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked Picture

Thanks for the kind comments! Yes I was on the train when I took it, as noted on the original upload, here:-[[1]] Richard Harvey 09:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noted you wanted some uncopyrighted photo's - I've just added some images to Huddersfield_railway_station, Huddersfield, Lockwood_railway_station, Lockwood, Paddock and started an article for Beaumont Park plus more photo's for Brockholes railway station, Brockholes, Berry_Brow railway station and Honley. Richard Harvey 19:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I've just added some photo's and a section on the pub saga to the Castle Hill article. could you check my summing up of the Thandi brothers action and ensure it's correct please. Richard Harvey 23:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Placement

Whohe, Hi! Just to let you know that I have put the images you changed, (Huddersfield & District), back to the original placings I used when I uploaded the images and or created the articles. I would like them to be first, but it is against Wikipedia guidlines to do so as leading text should always come first. It's better to do that before more - strict - editors decide to change everything around. I had this problem a long time back and was taken to bits by administrators then. The guidelines do allow for images up to 550px to be used. So I have a policy of changing those back as well, some people only have 800x600px monitors but most these days are 1280 - 1400 on 15" and 17" screens so 500px is an average size. Also I note you still have Berry Brow Rail Station and Lockwood on your required picture list. I have uploaded those images also. Richard Harvey 14:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds

Hi. This is an odd question, so I came direct to your page seeing as you seem to have done most of the maintaining on "Leeds districts" and "Leeds environs". Is Middleton actually part of the city? If you look at the talk page for Middleton, Leeds, I asked if this is right. However, I don't think that article is exactly the most popular on Wikipedia.

License tagging for Image:Nikeairmax90.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Nikeairmax90.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Railway stations

Hey - just a note to say well done on the railway station articles. I remember creating many of those, and its great to see them worked on and improved =) Keep up the good work man doktorb _words^deeds 07:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen lots that you've worked on and they look in fine shape! Keep up the good work. Fraslet 19:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Usage

To save edits, can you use the 2004 - 2005 usage update and also use "exits0405". Simply south 13:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget the years as well by replacing "exits" with "exits0405". Simply south 16:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Whohe!

License tagging for Image:Wembleystat.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Wembleystat.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Wembleystatbridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wembleystatbridge.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Lowerhouses

Hi Whohe! I just noted your edit to the article, whilst patrolling with wiki VandalProof, and wondered why you removed the infobox template from the article. The general idea is to put those in every article that is about a place/location. So it may just end up getting put back by some editor in the future? Richard Harvey 19:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Harvey,

Ta for your comment.

The infobox yes is a noble idea but Lowerhouses is not relevant enough to warrant it. It's really a district og Hudds. Villages and towns, yes of course they should have infoboxes.

Whohe! 15:12 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Suburbs of Huddersfield

Hi, I see that you have removed some of the more obscure 'suburbs' of Huddersfield, however I think that a few of them, specifically Cowmes, Greenside & Rashcliffe do actually deserve to stay, as they are recognised areas of the town. I've added them back with a couple of others. --Thozza 21:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Challenge

Thanks for your feedback on the Challenge and Simon Davis articles. Actually, it was another user who deleted the 'mullet' and the 'world's saddest maths teacher lines; I simply reinstated the latter because it was so funny. I'm currently working on some women's cricket stuff but after that, I might have to attack the Nehru Cup and the World Championship of Cricket. And yes, I do remember the Perth Challenge of 1987 and I even still have the official program (minus a few player pictures which I cut out for a primary school assignment).

inxia 05:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy Special Editions Models Category

Hello BetacommentBot,

Why was this category removed ?

I found it useful to see who had been a modelled in the Playboy Special Editions.

I would be grateful if you will reply.

Thank you

--Whohe! 18:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

there was a WP:CFD that deleted the cat off hand i dont know the date. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy Woollen Category

You may have noticed that I added Ossett, Morley, Horbury, etc. to the Heavy Woollen District category. I notice that you said that the group was to be based around North Kirklees, and I was just wondering whether you mind the inclusion of non-Kirklees towns/villages? I do think that it would be inappropriate to have a Heavy Woollen category without Ossett though, as it was always seen as one of the main centres of the shoddy trade - certainly more than Mirfield or the Spen Valley was! Give us a message back; just didn't want to mess up your category Epa101 11:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epa101, i set up the category so that the towns and villages in the North Kirklees area could belong somewhere. The title Heavy Wollen District fit as historically the area was known for it and it is a more interesting title than North Kirklees.

I think it is fine that Ossett is included as it produced the goods.

Ta for your message.

--Whohe! 13:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Southken.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Southken.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 03:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Southkenton.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Southkenton.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 03:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cmon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cmon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:ColneV100.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColneV100.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Clack

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Michelle Clack, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ Bigr Tex 15:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huddersfield

Hi! Apologies! without having my brain in gear I reverted your last edit to the Huddersfield article, whilst I was browsing through in history mode. When I realised what I had done I took another closer look and decided to add a section to include nearby places, in addition to the local suburbs. This I hope will help save some confusion over what is or isn't part of Huddersfield. Could you take a look and see what you think? Richard Harvey 19:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:XLRec5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec5.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Handbra

Handbra has been proposed for deletion and needs your two-fisted support. Handbra thanks you. H Bruthzoo 08:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Woodhouseridge9999.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Woodhouseridge9999.JPG and also as Image:Woodhouseridge999.JPG. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Reebokclassic909.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reebokclassic909.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:EJA1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EJA1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 22:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Water Orton railway station

I've reverted your recent edits to Water Orton railway station; they were not, as you claimed, "minor"; and included the undeclared and unexplained removal of content. Andy Mabbett 13:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I should have explained the changes I made in detail. All I did was state which district the station is in (North Warwickshire) as that space on the page is currently blank.

Plus I stated as what service to expect at Water Orton incase I or someone else ever waited there. I deleted the mention of London after consulting current rail timetables produced by Central Trains as there is no longer a direct service.

In future if i make any changes, I will explain below to the world.

ta

--Whohe! 17:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed the latitude and longitude parameters. Andy Mabbett 17:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to believe the latitute/longitude parameters were removed by accident. However, Whohe! is probably advised to read WP:MINOR as soon as possible: adding extra content and removing incorrect content shouldn't ever count as "minor" (even if they don't seem important to you at the time). --RFBailey 21:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2005-2006

Well, i've updated them on WP:Rail's main page. Anyway, here is the link for you. Why not join? Simply south 17:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Orbitalthealt.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orbitalthealt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:18 Headingley.jpg

I have copied your image over to Wikimedia Commons, where it is now named Image:Headingley 2001.jpg. Commons is a repositry for freely-licensed media that, amongst other things, can be used across the many Wikipedia-related projects. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 12:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:CNV00023.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Stonebridgepark999.JPG. The copy called Image:Stonebridgepark999.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:36autobus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:36autobus.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Moor Grange

Thanks for the compliment. I did add a pic but it got deleted by a BOT. I'll try and add it again with the ubiquitous references. Do you know much about Moor Grange? Chilkoot 14:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moor Grange pt 3

I lived there from 1959 till I moved away in '82. Last thing I remember about the 56 was it went from Horsforth to Gipton (or was it Whinmoor).

Just after I moved the Buses were deregulated and all hell was let loose for a few weeks according to my brother. Am currently residing in Essex nr to Stansted in a small town called Great Dunmow. Have you ever visited Moor Grange? Chilkoot 19:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Salford Central 100.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Salfordcentral100.JPG. The copy called Image:Salfordcentral100.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 12:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mannyairport100.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mannyairport100.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Holbecknew2.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Holbecknew.JPG. The copy called Image:Holbecknew.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ponders End railway station

Hi Whohe!.I noticed you added the infobox for this station ,sorry it needs fixing.I had a try but failed.CheersNorthmetpit (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ta for the prompt. I'll gove it a go !--Whohe! (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLAmerican.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLAmerican.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRec2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRec3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRec4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRecord5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRecord5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLfirst1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLfirst1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orbitalinsides.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orbitalinsides.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orbitalmiddle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orbitalmiddle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit

A minor edit signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc. Please don't mark your edits as minor when they are not! (E.g. Settle railway station, Rufford railway station. Thanks. --Dr Greg (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helensburgh Upper railway station

Please stop removing signalling information from railway station articles. And if you are going to remove any significant pieces of information from an article, please say so clearly in the edit summary ("re-jigg" doesn't suggest removal of content) and do not mark it as a minor edit. Thank you. Signalhead (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you.

None of the following edits qualify as 'minor':

Signalhead (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images of rail stations

Pencefn,

Any chance that you could be able to photograph rail stations in the Glasgow/West of Scotland region ?

This would make Wiki entries for these stations more complete.

--Whohe! (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have some taken over the years. My recent photography expeditions have been concentrating on the Lanarkshire and Ayrshire Railway. However, when I get out with my camera, I will be opportunistic. Kelvinbridge railway station was one of my targets for photography. --Stewart^(talk) 15:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment on my Talk page! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 16:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Station distances

I notice that you have been adding distances to the introduction of many station articles, thisn is a useful extra detail. "Traditional" lines in Britain are measured in miles (a topic that has been discussed several times at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways) and so you might like to follow this pattern - it will save a lot of subsequent edits!

You can also get Wiki to do the miles/kilometres conversion for you by using the {{convert}} template. For instance, {{convert|10|mi|km|0}} will appear in an articles as:"10 miles (16 km)" (the last zero is to round the kms to the nearest whole number). Geof Sheppard (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Railway station infobox photos

Hi there, I've noticed that you are often increasing the size of infobox station photos to 300px, or creating them at that size to begin with. Please note that it was agreed on over at the talk page for the infobox that 265px be the recommended photo size. A new field 'image_name' has also been created as a substitute for 'image', which will hardcode the photo to 265px. This is by no means compulsory for you to do, but at 300px the infobox ends up being stretched, and 265px is about the maximum a photo can fit in without stretching. Eventually (hopefully!) all photos will be hardcoded to 265px.

Nevertheless, good work on the photos you have uploaded this evening! --- Dreamer ⁸⁴ 19:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1986 WSC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1986 WSC.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OrbitalVert.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalVert.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:OrbitalVert.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalVert.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tynemouth Metro station

The article infobox specifies the location (and wikilinks it too) to give the article context - along with the rest of the article content. Wikilinking the first mention of Tynemouth on its own should be sufficient, without having to state the fact in the text. That's why wikilinks are so useful, you keep the narrative flowing, and people who desire more information (where is Tynemouth?) can click it to find out. Ta. DrFrench (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jonny L 27.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonny L 27.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 13:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Bellislecircus111.jpg

Image:Bellislecircus111.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Bellislecircus111.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Bellislecircus111.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to World Series Cup

Hi. I was feeling a bored and I felt I could contribute something to the World Series Cup cricket page which you have done a fair bit of work on. Feel free to let me know what you think. I'm still thinking that the 'notable events' section needs to be re-written in a more encyclopaedic format. Maybe that's a job for another day.

inxia (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ta for letting me about your editing but remember the article belongs to all of us.

My tips : Keep it simple, keep it interesting and add some pictures.

Thanks for adding the extra info but if you get some free images of cricketers in various WSC uniforms this would be great.

--Whohe! (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hayley Finch

I have nominated Hayley Finch, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley Finch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 08:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Rochdalestationfrontage112.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Rochdalestationfrontage112.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rochdalestationfrontage112.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 05:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds Road, Huddersfield

Hi, I am moving this back to Leeds Road because that was the name of the stadium; it was never known as Leeds Road, Huddersfield. There are numerous precedents - Brisbane Road etc. Also, Leeds Road was the result of a WP:RM. If you are unhappy please raise a further RM. TerriersFan (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Halifaxstation201.jpg

File:Halifaxstation201.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Halifax-Station.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Halifax-Station.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Halifax station200.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Halifax station.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holbecknew2.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Holbecknew2.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wembleystat2.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Wembleystat2.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peta Todd

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Peta Todd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no sources, no genuine claim to notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rawtenstall bus station

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rawtenstall bus station, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unimportant buscruft

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ipatrol (talk) 23:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rawtenstall bus station

I have nominated Rawtenstall bus station, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawtenstall bus station. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ipatrol (talk) 00:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD closed as merge. It's no good reverting back against this decision. Fences and windows (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XLRaggatip.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XLRaggatip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raindance (rave)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raindance (rave), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Supertouch (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Raindance (rave), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Supertouch (talk) 04:24, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Washington Galleries bus station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Washington Galleries bus station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RDN1F (don't) (talk) (to) (me) (before) (my) (coffee) (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Washington Galleries bus station

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Washington Galleries bus station, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peta Todd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peta Todd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peta Todd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 19:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Wirral Line. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Raywil (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Useful additions to bus station articles

Few suggestions for when you're starting articles on bus stations and others. There's usually a category for "Transport in xxxshire" - not only is that a useful addition in itself, but it helps The_Anomebot2 correctly categorise the {{coord missing}}. Even better would be if you could add the {{ coord}} tag yourself. It would also be useful if you could tag the Talk page with WikiProject Buses and the appropriate county WP (or WP England if the county one doesn't exist, which not all of them do). See eg my edits to MetroCentre Interchange to give you an idea. Le Deluge (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quarry Hill 999.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Quarry Hill 999.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xl200.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xl200.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:World Series Cup Cricket, 1980-81 cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World Series Cup Cricket, 1980-81 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Peta Todd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Page 3

West Midlands bus route 11 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BBC Radio 5

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited National Express Coach route 561, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shipley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited Wind It Up (Rewound), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elektra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Impalas cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stephenson (cricketer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WCofC.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WCofC.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yearbook 1985.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yearbook 1985.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tribalg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tribalg.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Xminer099.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Xminer099.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hull Paragon Interchange, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scarborough and Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Yearbook 1985.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Yearbook 1985.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rae & Christian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jazzy Jeff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hannah Claydon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goals on Sunday (Yorkshire TV), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ITV and John Helm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greater Manchester bus route 184, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diggle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brampton, Cambridgeshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hinchingbrooke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stagecoach bus route 555

The article Stagecoach bus route 555 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG; no third-party secondary sources to indicate the notability of this specific subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 22:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stagecoach bus route 555

added links pointing to Carlisle, Keswick, Staveley, Lancaster and Langdale Pike

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guildford bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guildford bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guildford bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 01:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Football League Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Helm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox bus station

Template:Infobox bus station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orbital discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nothing Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crosland Moor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockwood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanleysmith99.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stanleysmith99.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Reebokclassic999.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Reebokclassic999.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reebokclassics303.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reebokclassics303.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mumpsoldham.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Mumpsoldham.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hattersleystation999.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Hattersleystation999.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hattersleystation888.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Hattersleystation888.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The36autobus.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The36autobus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Levenshulme100.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Levenshulme100.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 13:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Syonlaneflash999.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Syonlaneflash999.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weetonrailway909.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Weetonrailway909.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox English bus stations listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox English bus stations. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox English bus stations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 12:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julia Breck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stooge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Whohe!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Whohe!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edgware bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edgware bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgware bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 08:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Daniel Farke, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have added the reference. Thanks for the nudge. User:Whohe!

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carhartt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Whohe!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Briggate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Briggate. Since you had some involvement with the Briggate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby

Sorry for the revert, just noticed the duplication that you were fixing. I will redo the section entirely later as the whole sub-sectioning is unnecessary. Koncorde (talk) 17:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aldgate bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldgate bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldgate bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Turnpike Lane bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turnpike Lane bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turnpike Lane bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A643 road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Calder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leeds City bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leeds City bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeds City bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SK2242 (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pudsey bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pudsey bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pudsey bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SK2242 (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heavy Woollen District has been nominated for discussion

Category:Heavy Woollen District has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brent Cross bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Cross bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Cross bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Elmsall bus station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Elmsall bus station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Elmsall bus station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 11:25, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sindhu Vee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leona Maguire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huddersfield Cricket League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birkby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NatWest Series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NatWest Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NatWest Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joseph2302 (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Category:Huddersfield and District" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Category:Huddersfield and District has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Category:Huddersfield and District until a consensus is reached. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello Whohe!. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Stacey Poole, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Whohe!. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Whohe!|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Maliner (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Whohe!, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Whohe!|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Maliner (talk) 15:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article moved to draft space

Hi, I moved your recent article to draft space by giving a valid edit summary. Please check and improve if you're interested. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing! :-) Maliner (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stacey Poole

The article Stacey Poole has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Poole moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stacey Poole. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stacey Poole

Hello, Whohe!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stacey Poole, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stacey Poole

Hello, Whohe!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stacey Poole".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]