Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoinj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bitcoin. MBisanz ^talk 21:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bitcoinj[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedic. Notability not established, no RS, no hope for expansion. Article created by SPA. MSJapan (talk) 01:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The article needs life support, but two of the sources are reliable (1 and 3). The subject may not be significant, but may meet WP:WEBCRIT for possible inclusion. - Mr X 01:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Bitcoin. Perhaps if this gains traction, it will warrant it's own page at some point. In the meantime, the fact that Google has introduced an open source version of Bitcoin is certainly worth a note. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 02:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge for now. It doesn't have enough content (or established independent notability) for its own article right now. If it belongs on wikipedia, then it will fit perfectly in the parent article. It can always be split out later if needed. — Jess· Δでるた ♥ 19:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable or expandable. --Scochran4 (talk) 12:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Belongs in the main Bitcoin article until or unless this implementation of Bitcoin becomes notable in its own right. Circumspect (talk) 08:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.