Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DocZilla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DocZilla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This defunct product has no third party references to show notability. Searching news shows PR Newswire releases, and a few minor mentions that product exists when discussing XML readers, but not articles about this product. Miami33139 (talk) 05:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. This is about an abandonware web browser. Parts need translation into English: Using OpenSP as an SGML parser, DocZilla reads SGML and XML documents directly into a DOM tree (without XSLT transformations), and styles and renders them with CSS. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Delete per nom, not notable. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Google says the term "DocZilla" no longer appears on the Citec website. I found a site (blacklisted in Wikipedia's spam filter) which says the "DocZilla project came to an abrupt end in 2001" "due to some unfortunate license complexities". As someone with an interest in the history of markup systems, I'm intrigued by a product that translated SGML and XML directly into a "Document Object Model" tree; nevertheless, this dead product is not at all WikiNotable. Cheers, CWC 13:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom and above. Dewritech (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteZilla clearly NN. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 19:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.